DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determination of mixed or gender-separated feeding on the growth performance of Korean native chickens when compared with white semi-broilers and commercial broilers at 35 days after hatching

  • Myunghwan, Yu (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jun Seon, Hong (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Yu Bin, Kim (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Shan Randima, Nawarathne (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Oketch Elijah, Ogola (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jung Min, Heo (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Young-Joo, Yi (Department of Agricultural Education, College of Education, Sunchon National University)
  • Received : 2021.08.30
  • Accepted : 2021.09.23
  • Published : 2021.12.01

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of mixed and separate gender feeding on the growth performance and carcass traits of Korean native chickens (KNC) compared to white semi-broilers (WSB) and a commercial broiler (CB) from hatching to 35 days. Here, 240 chicks were used with eight birds per cage in a randomized design with six replicates per breed. For the KNC lines, three groups of males (KNC-M), mixed-gender birds (KNC-FM) and females (KNC-F) were used. The two-phase feeding program used here consisted of a starter phase (days 1 - 21: crude protein [CP] 20% and metabolizable energy [ME], 3,050 kcal·kg-1) and a grower phase (days 22 - 35: CP 18%, 3,100 kcal·kg-1) for a commercial broiler. The WSB and CB were fed the only starter commercial diet. Fresh water and feed were provided ad-libitum. The results revealed that the KNC group had a lower (p < 0.05) body weight (BW) from day 7 and day 35 compared to that of the CB. Furthermore, the KNC group showed a lower (p > 0.05) average daily gain (ADG) relative to that of the CB during the entire experimental period. No difference (p > 0.05) was observed in the shank length among the treatments. There were also no significant differences in the growth performance or carcass traits between the KNC-M and WSB groups or in the genders of the KNC group.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 IPET 농림수산식품기술기획평가원 Golden Seed Project (213010055SB240)의 연구비 지원에 의해 수행되었으며, 이에 감사드립니다.

References

  1. Ahn BK, Kim JY, Kim JS, Lee BK, Lee SY, Lee WS, Oh ST, Kim JD, Kim EJ, Hyun Y, et al. 2009. Comparisons of the carcass characteristics of male white mini broilers, Ross broilers and Hy-Line brown chicks under the identical rearing condition. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 36:149-155. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2009.36.2.149
  2. Cho HM, Son HC, Wickramasuriya SS, Macelline SP, Hong JS, Kim YB, Cho SH, Heo JM, Yi YJ. 2019. Growth performance of crossed breed Korean domestic chickens for twelve weeks after hatching. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 46:591-599. [in Korean]
  3. Hong JS, Cho HM, Wickramasuriya SS, Shin TK, Kim EJ, Heo JM, Yi YJ. 2018. Growth performance of Korean crossbred domestic chickens for 12 weeks after post hatching. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 45:733-739. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20180065
  4. Hong YW, Lee SH. 2017. A study on consumer preference survey for developing samgyetang and its development strategies - Focused on retorted pouch products. Journal of Digital Design 17:21-30.
  5. Jeong HS, Utama DT, Kim J, Barido FH, Lee SK. 2020. Quality comparison of retorted Samgyetang made from white semi-broilers, commercial broilers, Korean native chickens, and old laying hens. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 33:139.
  6. Kang BS, Cheong IC, Lee SJ, Kim SH, Ohh BK, Choi KS. 1997. Estimation of heterosis for some economic traits in crossbreds between Korean native chicken and rhode island red-II. Laying performance of Korean native chicken and rhode island red crossbreds. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 24:127-137. [in Korean]
  7. Kim S, Jeon SG. 2021. Evaluating the social benefit of providing marketing information of livestock products. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 48:219-230. [in Korean]
  8. KNCA (Korean Native Chicken Association). 2020. The number of slaughtered chicken. Accessed in http://www.kncca.kr on 11 August 2020. [in Korean]
  9. Lee JH, Lee JH, Lee KT. 2014. Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of Samgyetang retorted at different F 0 values during storage at room temperature. Korean Journal of Food Preservation 21:491-499. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.11002/KJFP.2014.21.4.491
  10. Lee S, Park J, Nam K. 2019. Comparison of micronutrients and flavor compounds in breast meat of native chicken strains and Baeksemi for Samgyetang. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 46:255-262. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2019.46.4.255
  11. Lee SJ, Lee KH, Ohh BK, Ohh SJ. 1985. Studies on the carcass rates, natrient contents and optimum prices of broilers and old layers as related to body weight. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 12:113-118.
  12. Lee SY, Park JY, Hyun JM, Jung S, Jo C, Nam KC. 2018. Comparative analysis of meat quality traits of new strains of native chickens for Samgyetang. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 45:175-182. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2018.45.3.175
  13. Nawarathne SR, Lee SK, Cho HM, Wickramasuriya SS, Hong JS, Kim YB, Heo JM, Yi YJ. 2020. Determination and comparison of growth performance parameters between two crossbred strains of Korean native chickens with a white semi broiler chicken for 84 days post-hatch. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 47:255-262. https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20200016
  14. NIAS (National Institute of Animal Science). 2018. Korean feeding standard for poultry. NIAS, Wanju, Korea. [in Korean]
  15. Ogola OE, Cho HM, Hong JS, Kim YB, Nawarathne SR, Yu M, Heo JM, Yi YJ. 2021. Mixed and separate gender feeding influenced the growth performance for two lines of Korean native chickens when compared to a white semibroiler and a commercial broiler from day 1 to 35 post-hatch. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 48:171-178. https://doi.org/10.7744/KJOAS.20210011
  16. Oh HJ, Kim KJ, Bae IK, Yun W, Lee JH, Lee CH, Kwak WG, Liu S, An JS, Yang SH, et al. 2019. Comparison of the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal microflora, blood profiles, and meat quality of broilers, Korean native chickens and white semi broilers under an identical breeding environment. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 46:351-359. [in Korean]
  17. Park MN, Hong EC, Kang BS, HwangBo J, Kim HK. 2011. Performance and meat quality of three-crossbreed Korean native chickens (KNC). Korean Journal of Poultry Science 38:293-304. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2011.38.4.293
  18. Park S, Kim N, Choi S, Moon J. 2020. The consumption patterns of Korean native chicken. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 47:247-254. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2020.47.4.247
  19. Shin TK, Wickramasuriya SS, Kim E, Cho HM, Heo JM, Yi YJ. 2017a. Comparative study of growth performances of six different Korean native chicken crossbreeds from hatch to twelve weeks of age. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 44:244-253. [in Korean]
  20. Shin TK, Wickramasuriya SS, Kim EJ, Cho HM, Hong JS, Lee HG, Heo JM, Yi YJ. 2017b. Study of six different commercial Koran-native chicken crossbreeds from hatch to twelve weeks of age. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 44:531-540. [in Korean]
  21. Yu M, Cho HM, Hong JS, Kim YB, Nawarathne SR, Heo JM, Yi YJ. 2021. Comparison of growth performance of Korean native chickens, broiler chickens and white semi broilers during 40 days after hatching. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 48:133-140. [in Korean]