Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An empirical study on the influencing factors of learning through knowledge sharing live streaming - Based on live streaming platform in China

지식 공유 라방 학습 영향요인에 대한 실증 연구 - 중국 라이브 방송 플랫폼을 기반으로 하여

  • Liu, Yi (Dept. of Experience Design, TED, Kookmin University) ;
  • Pan, Young-Hwan (Dept. of Experience Design, TED, Kookmin University)
  • 류이 (국민대학교 테크노디자인전문대학원 경험디자인학과) ;
  • 반영환 (국민대학교 테크노디자인전문대학원 경험디자인학과)
  • Received : 2021.10.04
  • Accepted : 2021.12.20
  • Published : 2021.12.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The emergence of knowledge-sharing live streamers provides more diversified content to the live streaming platform. Analysis of the factors affecting the intention to use knowledge sharing live streaming users can allow the live streaming platform to understand better the adoption characteristics of users who follow this type of content. Help platform operators provide better services and help live streaming platforms innovate. Based on the TAM model, this research uses questionnaire surveys and structural equation models to construct a conceptual model of the influencing factors of users' intentions in the knowledge sharing live streaming and conduct an empirical analysis on the influencing factor models. The results of data analysis show that a significant influence of users' attitudes of knowledge sharing live streaming is perceived usefulness, followed by flow experience; perceived value has a positive impact on users' attitudes and intention to use, and the positive influence of users attitude significantly affect the user's intention.

지식 공유 라이브 방송의 출현은 라이브 방송 플랫폼에 더 많은 다원화적인 내용을 제공하였다. 지식 공유 라이브 방송 사용자의 사용 의향에 대한 영향 요인을 분석하면 인터넷 라이브 방송 플랫폼으로 하여금 이러한 내용에 관심을 가지는 사용자의 사용 특징을 더 잘 이해하게 할 수 있다. 또한 플랫폼 운영업체에 더 좋은 서비스를 제공하여 라이브 방송 플랫폼의 혁신에 도움을 줄 수 있다. 본 연구는 TAM모델을 기반으로 설문조사와 구조방정식 모형을 이용해 지식 공유 라이브 방송 중 사용자 의향에 대한 영향 요인에 관한 개념 모형을 구축하고 지식 사용자의 영향 요인 모형에 대해 실증 분석을 진행한다. 데이터 분석 결과에 따르면, 사용자가 지식 공유 라이브 방송 태도에 미치는 유의한 영향은 지각된 유용성이고 다음은 몰입 체험이며, 지각된 가치는 사용자 태도와 사용 의향에 긍정적 영향을 미치고 사용자 태도의 긍정적 영향은 사용자의 사용 의향에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. C. C. Chen & Y. C. Liu. (2018) What drives live-stream usage intention? The perspectives of flow, entertainment, social interaction, and endorsement. Telematics and Informatics, 293-303. DOI : 10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.003
  2. Twitch Usage and Growth Statistics: How Many People Use Twitch in 2021. Available online:https://backlinko.com/twitch-users
  3. Z. Lu. (2021) Understanding and Supporting Live Streaming in Non-Gaming Contexts .Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.Canada.. DOI : 10.1145/3025453.3025642
  4. China Internet Network Information Center.The 47th China Statistical Report on Internet Development. http://www.cnnic.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/202102/P020210203334633480104.pdf
  5. Z. Lu, H. Xia, S. Heo & S. Wigdor. (2018). You Watch, You Give, and You Engage: A Study of Live Streaming Practices in China. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18), 2018, pages Paper, 466, 13. DOI : 10.1145/3173574.3174040
  6. X. Su. (2019). An Empirical Study on the Influencing Factors of E-Commerce Live Streaming, In 2019 International Conference on Economic Management and Model Engineering (ICEMME). IEEE, 492-496. DOI : 10.1109/ICEMME49371.2019.00103
  7. Z. Lu. (2019) Improving Viewer Engagement and Communication Efficiency within Non-Entertainment Live Streaming. In The Adjunct Publication of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 162-165. DOI : 10.1145/3332167.3356879
  8. C. Chiu, E. T. G.Wang, F. Shih & Y. Fan. (2011). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities. Online Information Review, 35(1), 134-153. DOI : 10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001
  9. K. Scheibe, K. J. Fietkiewicz & W. G. Stock. (2016). Information behavior on social live streaming services. Journal of information science theory and practice 4(2), 6-20. DOI : 10.1633/JISTaP.2016.4.2.1
  10. K. Payne, M. J. Keit, R. M. Schuetaler. (2017). Examining the learning effects of livestreaming video game instruction over Twitch. 2019. DOI: 110.1016/j.chb.08.029
  11. F. D. Davis, R. P. BAGOZZI & P. R. WARSHAW. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, (8), 982-1003. DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  12. J. W. Moom & Y. G. Kim. (2010) . Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & management,38(4), 217-230. DOI : 10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
  13. W. Song & X. Zhu. (2015). A study of mobile library users' behavioral intentions based on TAM model. Librarianship Research, (11), 71-77. DOI:10.15941/j.cnki.issn1001-0424.2015.11.014
  14. J. Ming, C. Guo & J. Zhang. (2017). A review of research on mobile library user perception behavior based on technology acceptance model in my country . Library Forum, 37(7), 125-131.
  15. M. L. Richins. (1997). Measuring Emotions in the Consumption Experience. Journal of Consumer Research 24(2), 127-146. DOI : 10.1086/209499
  16. M. Csikszentmihalyi. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  17. J. A. Ghani & S. P. Deshpande. (1994) Task Characteristics and the Experience of Optimal Flow in Human-Computer Interaction. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 128(4), 381-394. DOI : 10.1080/00223980.1994.9712742
  18. W. Xiong, S. Wang & Q. Pan. (2015). Research on the influence of WeChat mobile social user's flow experience on user stickiness. News, (7), 13-18. DOI:10.15897/j.cnki.cn51-1046/g2.2015.07.003
  19. C. C. L. Judy. (2007) Online stickiness: its antecedents and effect on purchasing intention. Behavior & Information Technology, 26(6), 507-516. DOI:10.1080/01449290600740843
  20. M. C. Lee. (2010). Explaining and predicting users'continuance intention toward e-learning: an extension of the expectation-confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54(2), 506-516. DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002
  21. W. Wang, R. Shi & X. Li. (2017). Research on the Influencing Factors of Online Learning Continuous Willingness Based on Flow Experience. China Distance Education, (05), 17-23. DOI:10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.20170517.004
  22. Y. Li, Y. Peng. (2021) What drives gift-giving intention in live streaming? The perspectives of emotional attachment and flow experience. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 1-13. DOI:10.1080/10447318.2021.1885224
  23. T. Kim & F. Biocca. (1997). Telepresence via television: two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,3(2). DOI:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00073.x
  24. F. H. Nah. B. Eschenbrenner & D. Dewester. (2011). Enhancing brand equity through flow and telepresence: a comparison of 2d and 3d virtual worlds. Mis Quarterly, 35(3), 731-747. DOI:10.2307/23042806
  25. D. L. Hoffman & T. P. Novak. (2009).Flow online: Lessons learned and future prospects. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(1), 23-34. DOI:10.1016/j.intmar.2008.10.003
  26. M. M. Wong & M. Csikszentmihalyi. (2014). Affiliation motivation and daily experience: Some issues on gender differences. In Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education. Springer, Dordrecht, 305-326. DOI:10.1007/978-94-017-9094-9_16
  27. Z. Guo, L. Xiao. C. V. Toorn. Y. Lai & C. Seo. (2015). Promoting online learners'continuance intention: an integrated flow framework. Information & Management, 53(2), 279-295. DOI:10.1016/j.im.2015.10.010
  28. L. LaPointe & M. Reisetter. (2008). Belonging online: Students' perceptions of the value and efficacy of an online learning community. International Journal on E-learning, 7(4), 641-665.
  29. R. L. Oliver & W. S. De Sarbo. (1988) Response determinants in satisfaction judgments. Journal of Consumer Research,14(4), 495-508. DOI:10.1086/209131
  30. V. A. Zeithaml. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price,quality and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. DOI:10.1177/002224298805200302
  31. M. B. Holbrook & E. C. Hirschman. (1982) The experiential aspects of consumption: consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132-140. DOI:10.1086/208906
  32. J. N. Sheth. B. I. Newmen & B. L. Gross. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: a theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research,22(2), 159-170. DOI:10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8
  33. R. L. Oliver. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research,17(4), 460-469. DOI:10.1177/002224378001700405
  34. J. C. Sweeney & G. N. Soutar. (2001). Consumer perceived value: the development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203-220. DOI:10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0
  35. P. Sweetser & P. Wyteh. (2005). Game Flow: A Model for Evaluating Player Enjoyment in Games. Computer in Entertainment, 3(3), 3. DOI:10.1145/1077246.1077253
  36. J. C. Nunnally. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw Hill.
  37. C. L. Hsu. K. C. Chang & M. C. Chen. (2012) Flow experience and internet shopping behavior: Investigating the moderating effect of consumer characteristics. Systems Research & Behavioral Science,29(3), 317-332. DOI:10.1002/sres.1101
  38. W. Yan. (2021). Whether "Ganhuo" are enough: feature extraction and problem mining of knowledge sharing live streaming. Knowledge of library information. 38(4), 4-14. DOI:10.13366/j.dik.2021.04.004