Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Effects and Ranks of Pressure Ulcer Preventive Programs in Intensive Care Units: A Network Meta-analysis

중환자실 욕창예방 프로그램 효과의 비교순위: 네트워크 메타분석

  • Ko, Ji Woon (Department of Nursing Science, Sunmoon University)
  • Received : 2021.11.06
  • Accepted : 2021.12.20
  • Published : 2021.12.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study conducted a network meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and ranking of pressure ulcer preventive programs in intensive care units. A frequency network meta-analysis was performed to identify evidence from relevant randomized control trials. A total of 10 randomized control trials involving 5 intervention subgroups were included in this study. Based on the ranking probabilities(P-Score), preventive materials was ranked as the most effective among all programs (P-Score 85.3.%: OR=0.12, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.49). Next was silicone foam dressing(P-Score 84.5%: OR=0.14, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.38), care bundle(P-Score 60.0%: OR=0.29, 95% CI: 0.07, 1.25), reposition (P-Score 32.3%: OR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.21, 2.09) and synthetic fabrics (P-Score 23.8%: OR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.20, 3.65). It is necessary to develop practical and efficient interventions that can prevent pressure ulcers in intensive care unit patients, improve patient safety, and reduce nurses' workload.

본 연구의 목적은 네트워크 메타분석 방법을 활용하여 중환자실 환자들의 욕창예방 중재의 비교효과와 순위를 평가하기 위하여 수행하였다. 네트워크 메타 분석은 R software의 "netmeta": 패키지를 이용한 빈도주의 방법을 이용하였다. 최종적으로 10편의 논문이 선정되었으며. 네트워크 메타 분석에 결과에 따른 욕창예방의 프로그램의 중재 간 비교우위는 욕창 표준중재와 비교하여 순위는 피부보호 용품 사용이(P-Score 85.3.%: OR=0.12, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.49) 가장 효과적일 확률이 높았으며 두 번째는 실리콘 폼 드레싱(P-Score 84.5%: OR=0.14, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.38)으로 나타났다. 그 다음으로는 통합중재 (P-Score 60.0%: OR=0.29, 95% CI: 0.07, 1.25), 체위변경 (P-Score 32.3%: OR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.21, 2.09) 그리고 마찰을 감소시킬 수 있는 직물의 사용(P-Score 23.8%: OR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.20, 3.65) 순이었다. 본 연구의 결과는 중환자실 욕창예방 프로그램의 효과적인 적용을 위한 정보를 제공 할 수 있을 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. M. Montague-McCown, J. Bena & C. N. Burchill. (2021). Effect of hospital lines on unit-acquired pressure injuries for adults in medical ICUs: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Critical Care Explorations, 3(1), 1-9. DOI : 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000336
  2. Z. Karimi, A. Mousavizadeh, H. Rafiei, N. Abdi, M. Behnammoghadam, M. Khastavaneh & S. Shahin. (2020). The effect of using olive oil and fish oil prophylactic dressing on heel pressure injury development in critically ill patients. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, 13, 59-65. DOI : 10.2147/CCID.S237728
  3. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. (2014). Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Clinical Practice Guideline. In E. Haesler (Ed.). Osborne Park, Western Australia: Cambridge Media.
  4. H. Babamohamadi, Z. Ansari, Z. M. Nobahar & M. Mirmohammadkhani. (2019) The effects of peppermint gel on prevention of pressure injury in hospitalized patients with head trauma in neurosurgical ICU: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 47(209), e102223. DOI : 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.102223.
  5. Y. H. Choi & S. R. Kim. (2021). The effect of uncoated paper application on skin moisture, risk of pressure injury and incidence of pressure injury in neurologic intensive care unit patients: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 27(4), e12919. DOI : 10.1111/ijn.12919.
  6. E. Hahnel et al. (2020). The effectiveness of two silicone dressings for sacral and heel pressure ulcer prevention compared with no dressings in high-risk intensive care unit patients: A randomized controlled parallel-group trial. British Journal of Dermatology, 183(2), 256-264. DOI : 10.1111/bjd.18621.
  7. P. Kalowes, V. Messina & M. Li. (2016). Five-layered soft silicone foam dressing to prevent pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit. American Journal of Critical Care, 25(6), e108-119. DOI : 10.4037/ajcc2016875
  8. Y. J. Lee, J. Y. Kim & W. Y. Shin. (2019). Use of prophylactic silicone adhesive dressings for maintaining skin integrity in intensive care unit patients: A randomised controlled trial. International Wound Journal, 16(Suppl.1), 36-42. DOI : 10.1111/iwj.13028
  9. F. Manzano et al. (2014). Comparison of two repositioning schedules for the prevention of pressure ulcers in patients on mechanical ventilation with alternating pressure air mattresses. Intensive Care Medicine, 40(11), 1679-1687. DOI : 10.1007/s00134-014-3424-3
  10. D. Pickham, N. Berte, M. Pihulic, A. Valdez, B. Mayer & M. Desai. (2018). Effect of a wearable patient sensor on care delivery for preventing pressure injuries in acutely ill adults: A pragmatic randomized clinical trial (LS-HAPI study). International Journal of Nursing Studies, 80(208), 12-19. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.12.012.
  11. N. Santamaria et al. (2015). A randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of soft silicone multi-layered foam dressings in the prevention of sacral and heel pressure ulcers in trauma and critically ill patients: The border trial. International Wound Journal, 12(3), 302-308. DOI : 10.1111/iwj.12101
  12. N. Tayyib, F. Coyer & P. A. Lewis. (2015). A two-arm cluster randomized control trial to determine the effectiveness of a pressure ulcer prevention bundle for critically ill patients. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47(3), 237-247. DOI : 10.1111/jnu.12136
  13. S. R. Shim, S. J. Kim, J. Lee & G. Rucker. (2019). Network meta-analysis: application and practice using R software. Epidemiology and Health, 41, e2019013. DOI : 10.4178/epih.e2019013
  14. Healthcare Improvement Scotland(2014), Scottish Government Clinical Advise: Methodology checklist2 randomised controlled trials, https://www.sign.ac.uk/what-we-do/methodology/checklists/
  15. G. Schwarzer & G. Rucker. (2021). Network Meta-Analysis using Frequentist Methods. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/netmeta/netmeta.pdf
  16. S. R. Shim. (2019). R meta-analysis for medicine and public health researchers. Seoul: Hannarae.
  17. M. Egger, G. D. Smith, M. Schneider & C. Mi nder. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629-634. DOI : 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
  18. E. Robb, B. Jarman, G. Suntharalingam, C. Higgens, R. Tennant & K. Elcock (2010). Using care bundles to reduce in-hospital mortality: quantitative survey. BMJ, 31(340), c1234. DOI : 10.1136/bmj.c1234. PMID: 20360220.
  19. D. L. Horner & M. C. Bellamy. (2012). Care bundles in intensive care. Continuing education in anaesthesia. Critical Care & Pain, 12(4), 199-202.
  20. H. W. Kang & J. W. Ko. (2018). Effectiveness of the intervention programs for pressure ulcer prevention in intensive care units : A meta-analysis. Journal of Korean Critical Care Nursing, 11(1), 67-78.