DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Reliability and Validity of Korean Version of the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale(K-IEPS)

한국어판 전문직 간 교육에 대한 인식 측정도구의 신뢰도와 타당도 검증

  • 박현정 (중앙대학교 일반대학원 간호학과) ;
  • 강희선 (중앙대학교 간호학과) ;
  • 강민정 (안산대학교 간호학과)
  • Received : 2021.10.26
  • Accepted : 2021.12.20
  • Published : 2021.12.28

Abstract

This research aims to adapt and evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (K-IEPS). The original IEPS was translated into Korean according to the World Health Organization's guidelines. A total of 302 questionnaires were collected from healthcare professional students at 4 universities in South Korea. The validity and reliability of the scale were measured using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). As a result of the factor analysis, a ten-item scale with two factors (Competency & Autonomy and Perception of Actual Cooperation) was achieved. Additionally, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient was found to be .87, and test-retest reliability was .83. Our study results show that the Korean version of the IEPS is a valid and reliable instrument. Therefore, the K-IEPS can be used in measuring interdisciplinary perceptions of healthcare professional students between different occupational groups.

본 연구는 한국어판 전문직 간 교육에 대한 인식 측정도구(K-IEPS)의 타당도와 신뢰도를 검증하기 위하여 시행되었다. 연구 방법은 전문직 간 교육에 대한 인식 측정 원도구를 세계보건기구의 가이드라인에 따라 한국어로 번안하였고, 번안된 도구를 활용하여 2020년 12월부터 2021년 1월까지 4개의 대학 보건의료전공 대학생 302명을 대상으로 자료를 수집하였다. 자료 분석은 탐색적 요인분석(EFA), 확인적 요인분석(CFA), 수렴타당도, Cronbach's alpha, 급내 상관계수(ICC)를 사용하여 분석을 실시하였다. 분석 결과, K-IEPS는 2개의 하위요인(역량과 자발성에 대한 인식, 실제적인 협력에 대한 인식)과 10개 문항이 적합하였다. 또한 K-IEPS의 전체문항 신뢰도 Cronbach's alpha는 .87이었고, 검사-재검사 신뢰도는 .83이었다. 본 연구에서 검증된 K-IEPS는 전문직 간 교육에 대한 인식을 측정하는데 타당도와 신뢰도가 있는 도구임이 확인되었다. 따라서 향후에 K-IEPS는 전문직 간 교육에 대한 인식 및 프로그램의 효과를 측정하기 위한 도구로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. T. Jadotte & K. Noel. (2021). Definitions and core competencies for interprofessional education in telehealth practice. Clinics in Integrated Care, 6, 100054. DOI : 10.1016/j.intcar.2021.100054
  2. S. Y. Guraya & H. Barr. (2018). The effectiveness of interprofessional education in healthcare: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 34(3), 160-165. DOI : 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.12.009
  3. R. Riskiyana, M. Claramita & G. R. Rahayu. (2018). Objectively measured interprofessional education outcome and factors that enhance program effectiveness: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 66(2018), 73-78. DOI : 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.04.014
  4. H. Han. (2017). Interprofessional education in medical education: can we break the silos?. Korean Medical Education Review, 19(1), 1-9. DOI : 10.17496/kmer.2017.19.1.1
  5. Y. H. Lee, D. Ahn, J. Moon & K. Han. (2014). Perception of interprofessional conflicts and interprofessional education by doctors and nurses. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 26(4), 257-264. DOI : 10.3946/kjme.2014.26.4.257
  6. K. H. Kim, E. Hwang & S. Shin. (2017). Current status and future direction of interprofessional education in nursing education. Korean Medical Education Review, 19(1), 18-24. DOI : 10.17496/kmer.2017.19.1.18
  7. S. Kim. (2017). Perceptions and attitudes towards interprofessional education in medical schools. Korean Medical Education Review, 19(1), 10-17. DOI : 10.17496/kmer.2017.19.1.10
  8. H. Jung, K. H. Park, K, Y. H. Min & E. Ji. (2020). The effectiveness of interprofessional education programs for medical, nursing, and pharmacy students. Korean journal of medical education, 32(2), 131. DOI : 10.3946/kjme.2020.161
  9. H. Park, J. Cho & S. H. Chu. (2018). Interprofessional education programs for nursing students: A systematic review. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 24(3), 235-249. DOI : 10.5977/jkasne.2018.24.3.235
  10. S. J. Yune, K. H. Park, Y. H. Min & E. Ji. (2020). Perception of interprofessional education and educational needs of students in South Korea: A comparative study. PLOS ONE, 15(12), e0243378. DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0243378
  11. H. Lee et al. (2019). Differences between perceived readiness for interprofessional learning in nursing and other health-related students. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 25(3), 312-320. DOI : 10.5977/jkasne.2019.25.3.312
  12. O. Y. Kwon, K. H. Park, K. H. Park K & Y. Kang. (2019). Validity of the self-efficacy for interprofessional experimental learning scale in Korea. Korean Medical Education Review, 21(3), 155-161. DOI : 10.17496/kmer.2019.21.3.155
  13. K. H. .Park, K. H. Park, O. Y. Kwon & Y. Kang. (2020). A validity study of the Korean version of the interprofessional attitudes scale. Korean Medical Education Review, 22(2), 122-130. DOI : 10.17496/kmer.2020.22.2.122
  14. S. Huebner, Q. Tang, L. Moisey, Y. Shevchuk & H. Mansell. (2021). Establishing a baseline of interprofessional education perceptions in first year health science students. Journal of interprofessional care, 35(3), 400-408. DOI : 10.1080/13561820.2020.1729706
  15. L. E. Walker, M. Cross & T. Barnett. (2019). Students' experiences and perceptions of interprofessional education during rural placement: a mixed methods study. Nurse education today, 75, 28-34. DOI : 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.12.012
  16. R. M. Luecht, M. K. Madsen, M. P. Taugher & B. J. Petterson. (1990). Assessing professional perceptions: Design and validation of an interdisciplinary education perception scale. J Allied Health, 19(2), 181-191.
  17. A. K. McFadyen, W. M.Maclaren & V. S. Webster. (2007). The Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS): an alternative remodelled sub-scale structure and its reliability. Journal of interprofessional care, 21(4), 433-443. DOI : 10.1080/13561820701352531
  18. A. R. Fernandes, A. Palombella, J. Salfi & B. Wainman. (2015). Dissecting through barriers: A mixed-methods study on the effect of interprofessional education in a dissection course with healthcare professional students. Anatomical sciences education, 8(4), 305-316. DOI : 10.1002/ase.1517
  19. Maharajan, M. K., Rajiah, K., Khoo, S. P., Chellappan, D. K., De Alwis, R., Chui, H. C., & Lau, S. Y. (2017). Attitudes and readiness of students of healthcare professions towards interprofessional learning. PloS one, 12(1), e0168863. DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0168863
  20. M. A. Bar, M. K. Leurer, S. Warshawsk & M. Itzhaki. (2018). The role of personal resilience and personality traits of healthcare students on their attitudes towards interprofessional collaboration. Nurse education today, 61, 36-42. DOI : 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.005
  21. D. A. Lie, C. C. Fung, J. Trial & K. Lohenry. (2013). A comparison of two scales for assessing health professional students' attitude toward interprofessional learning. Medical education online, 18(1), 21885. DOI : 10.3402/meo.v18i0.21885
  22. I. K. Tosunoz, S. K. Yikar, Z. Cercer, P. Kara, S. Arslan & E. Nazik. (2021). Perceptions of interdisciplinary education and readiness for inter-professional education of nursing students: A sample of three different cities in Turkey. Nurse Education Today, 97, 104673. DOI : 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104673
  23. B. Williams, M. Lynch, A. Olaussen, H. Lachmann, S. Kalen & S. Ponzer. (2018). Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the interdisciplinary education perception scale. Journal of interprofessional care, 32(1), 63-68. DOI : 10.1080/13561820.2017.1381077
  24. Y. Ino, T. Matsutama, T. Tachi, Y. Noguchi & H. Teramachi. (2018). Effect of Multidisciplinary Medical Care Team Education on Pharmacy Students - Short-term Effect Focused on RIPLS (Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale) and IEPS (Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale) -. Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, 44(4), 191-202. DOI : 10.5649/jjphcs.44.191
  25. F. Terzioglu, D. Aktas, N. Ertug & H. Boztepe. (2019). Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale: Validity and Reliability Studies/Disiplinlerarasi Egitim Algisi Olceginin (DEAO) Gecerlik ve Guvenirlik Calismasi. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing, 16(1), 15-21. DOI : 10.5222/HEAD.2019.015
  26. Z. Keshtkaran, F. Sharif & M. Rambod. (2014). Students' readiness for and perception of inter-professional learning: a cross-sectional study. Nurse education today, 34(6), 991-998. DOI : 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.12.008
  27. J. C. Anderson & D. W. Gerbing. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.103.3.411
  28. A. B. Costello & J. Osborne. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 10(1), 7. DOI : 10.7275/jyj1-4868
  29. G. Parsell & J. Bligh. (1999). The development of a questionnaire to assess the readiness of health care students for interprofessional learning (RIPLS). Medical education, 33(2), 95-100. DOI : 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00298.x
  30. A. K. McFadyen, V. Webster, K. Strachan, E. Figgins, H. Brown, & J. McKechnie. (2005). The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale: a possible more stable sub-scale model for the original version of RIPLS. Journal of interprofessional care, 19(6), 595-603. DOI : 10.1080/13561820500430157
  31. World Health Organization. (2009). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en
  32. National Center for interprofessional Practice and Education. (2013, November 1). IEPS: Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (Online). https://nexusipe.org/informing/resource-center/ieps-interdisciplinary-education-perception-scale
  33. S. S. Han & S. C. Lee. (2018). Using the SPSS/Amos nursing and health statistics analysis. Seoul: Hannarae publishing.
  34. F. A. Ganotice Jr & L. K. Chan. (2019). Which of the four models? Examining the measurement properties of the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS) in healthcare and socialcare prelicensure curriculum in Hong Kong. Journal of interprofessional care, 33(1), 1-7. DOI : 10.1080/13561820.2018.1512958