한국재료학회지 (Korean Journal of Materials Research)

  • 제31권11호
  • /
  • Pages.601-607
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1225-0562(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7258(eISSN)
한국재료학회 (Materials Research Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fabrication of Low Carbon Steel Coated with 18%Cr-2.5%Ni-Fe Powder by Laser Cladding and Its Application on Plastic Injection Mold for Aluminum Diecasting

  • 투고 : 2021.08.18
  • 심사 : 2021.10.31
  • 발행 : 2021.11.27
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Laser cladding a surface treatment process that grants superior characteristics such as toughness, hardness, and corrosion resistance to the surface, and rebuilds cracked molds; as such, it can be a strong tool to prolong service life of mold steel. Furthermore, compared with the other similar coating processes - thermal spray, etc., laser cladding provides superior bonding strength and precision coating on a local area. In this study, surface characteristics are studied after laser cladding of low carbon steel using 18%Cr-2.5%Ni-Fe powder (Rockit404), known for its high hardness and excellent corrosion resistance. A diode laser with wavelength of 900-1070 nm is adopted as laser source under argon atmosphere; electrical power for the laser cladding process is 5, 6, and 10 kW. Fundamental surface characteristics such as crossectional microstructure and hardness profile are observed and measured, and special evaluation, such as a soldering test with molten ALDC12 alloy, is conducted to investigate the corrosion resistance characteristics. As a result of the die-soldering test by immersion of low carbon alloy steel in ALDC12 molten metal, the clad layer's soldering thickness decreases.

키워드

과제정보

This study has been conducted with the support of the Korea Institute of Industrial Technology as "Development of Core Technologies for a Smart Mobility (kitech JA-21-0005)".

참고문헌

  1. M. U. Saleem, Sustainability, 10, 1761 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061761
  2. J. Tang, Energy Procedia, 5, 708 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.125
  3. N. Ali, Heliyon, 6, e05050 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05050
  4. Y. Li, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 9, 3856 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.02.012
  5. P. Kattire, J. Manuf. Process., 20, 492 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.06.018
  6. Z. Zhang, J. Alloys Compd., 790, 703 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.136
  7. X. Xu, J. Alloys Compd., 715, 362 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.252
  8. P. Farahmand, Lasers Manuf. Mater. Process., 1, 1 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40516-014-0001-0
  9. C. W. Kim, Arch. Metall. Mater., 66, 1033 (2021).
  10. K. Zhang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 317, 839 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.08.113
  11. G. Telasang, Surf. Coat. Technol., 258, 1108 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.07.023
  12. J. H. Lee, J. KWJS, 18, 27 (2000).
  13. Z. Liu, Surf. Coat. Technol., 384, 125325 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125325
  14. E. R. Mahmoud, Mater. Today: Proceedings, 39, 1029 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.763
  15. Y. T. Yoo, J. KSPE, 22, 17 (2005).
  16. H. Springer, Acta Mater., 59, 1586 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.023