DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Developing and Validating Core Competencies for Gifted Education Based on Delphi Technique

델파이 조사를 통한 영재교육 핵심역량 개발 및 타당화 연구

  • Park, Hye-Jin (Center for Teaching and Learning, Konkuk University) ;
  • Cha, Seung-Bong (Department of Early Childhood Education, Hoseo University) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Young (Department of Business Administration, Konkuk University)
  • 박혜진 (건국대학교 교수학습지원센터) ;
  • 차승봉 (호서대학교 유아교육과) ;
  • 김용영 (건국대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2021.08.19
  • Accepted : 2021.11.20
  • Published : 2021.11.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop core competencies for gifted education by utilizing Delphi survey methods and to present behavioral element selection and scale questions based on the definition of competencies. First, the core competence for gifted education was selected through literature analysis, and the first Delphi survey was conducted to verify that the definition of each competency is suitable for the competency name. Subsequently, through a second Delphi survey, detailed questions were developed and verified by expressing the capabilities required to develop core competencies as behavior elements. Through two rounds of Delphi surveys, eight key competencies were finally selected: attitude and practice willingness, communication and collaboration, information processing and tool utilization, creative problem solving, convergence and application, higher-order inference, community spirit, and learning achievement orientation. This study is meaningful in that it selects core competencies and behavior elements for gifted education that are necessary to pursue goals that meet social needs and it presents tools to measure the degree of competency improvement for gifted education.

본 연구는 델파이 조사 방법을 활용하여 영재교육 핵심역량을 개발하고, 역량별 정의를 토대로 행동 요소 선정 및 척도 문항을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 먼저 문헌 분석을 통해 영재교육 핵심역량을 선정한 후 각 역량의 정의가 역량명에 적합한지를 확인하기 위한 1차 델파이 조사를 진행하였다. 이후 2차 델파이 조사를 통해 핵심역량 함양을 위해 요구되는 능력을 행동 요소로 표현하여 세부 문항을 개발하고 타당화 작업을 수행하였다. 2차에 걸친 델파이 조사를 통해 태도와 실천의지, 의사소통과 협업, 정보처리와 도구 활용, 창의적 문제해결, 융합과 응용, 고등 추론, 공동체 의식, 학습성취지향의 8개 핵심역량을 최종적으로 선정하였다. 본 연구는 영재교육이 사회적 요구에 부합하는 목표를 추구하기 위해 필요한 영재교육 핵심역량과 행동 요소를 선정하고, 역량 함양의 정도를 측정할 수 있는 도구를 제시하였다는 데 의의가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Education. (2018). The 4th Comprehensive Plan for Promotion of Gifted Education.
  2. K. M. Kim. (2009). The Attractiveness and Limit of 'Competency-based' Education. The Journal of moral Education, 20(2), 171-197. https://doi.org/10.17715/jme.2009.02.20.2.171
  3. H. N. Kim, & Y. J. Lee. (2012). A Study on Core Competencies of Science-Gifted Students Based on Teachers' and Students' Perspectives. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(7), 1241-1250. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2012.32.7.1241
  4. K. H. So. (2009). Curricular-historical Base and its Liberal Nature of Competence-based Education. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027950270101
  5. Y. J. Lee, & Y. M. Kim. (2017). A Study on Perceptions and Educational Needs of Science Gifted High School Stakeholders based on Core Competencies. The Korean Society For The Gifted, 27(3), 349-366.
  6. D. C. McClelland. (1973). Testing for Competency Rather than for Intelligence. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034092
  7. M. Binkley, O. Erstad, J. Herman, S. Raizen, M. Ripley, M. Miller-Ricci & M. Rumble. (2012). Defining Twenty-First Century Skills In Griffin, P., McGaw, B. & Care, E. (eds.). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Springer.
  8. J. H. Lee, S. U. Jin, & H. K. Shin. (2016). G/T Experts' Recognition on Educating ICT Core-competencies for Gifted Students in Science. Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 17(6), 143-152. https://doi.org/10.7472/JKSII.2016.17.6.143
  9. S. D. Lee & K. S. Lee. (2015). A Comparative Study on Gifted Programs Abroad for Economically Disadvantaged or Minority Students. The Korean Society For The Gifted, 25(3), 439-463.
  10. C. H. Yoon & M. R. Chun. (2020). Analysis on Key Competencies of Gifted Students and Their Giftedness. Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction, 20(3), 1259-1283. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.3.1259
  11. J. H. Lee, K. B. Park, S. U. Jin, J. Y. Ryu, S. H. Ahn, & B. W. Jin. (2013). Modeling the Conception of Giftedness in Invention Based on Inventor's Three Main Aptitudes. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 23(3), 435-452. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2013.23.3.435
  12. J. J. Park, J. H. Yoon, & S. J. Kang. (2014). The Development on Core Competency Model of Scientist and Its Verification for Competency-Based Science Gifted Education. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 24(4), 509-541. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2014.24.4.509
  13. H. S. Yang, & S. J. Kang. (2016). Validation of Core Competencies Model for the Convergent Gifted Education. The Journal of the Korean Society for Gifted and Talented, 16(2), 107-134.
  14. M. J. Beak, K. K. Kang, & K. A. Kwon. (2019). A Basic Study on Operation of the Program for Enhancement of Science-Gifted Student's Development Competency. The Journal of the Korean Society for Gifted and Talented, 18(2), 47-70.
  15. S. W. Kim, Y. L. Chung, A. J. Woo, & H. J. Lee. (2012). Development of a Theoretical Model for STEAM Education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(2), 388-401. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2012.32.2.388
  16. J. S. Lee. (2001). The Delphi Method. Seoul: Kyoyookbook.
  17. J. E. Jang & S. W. Kim. (2014). Developing the Rubric for Measurement in Levels by Areas for the Characteristics of Task Commitment Shown in the Science Gifted. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(7), 657-666. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2014.34.7.0657
  18. H. J. Lee, Y. H. Choi & Y. J. Ko. (2015). Effects of Collective Intelligence-Based SSI Instruction on Promoting Middle School Students' Key Competencies as Citizens. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), 431-442. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2015.35.3.0431
  19. H. Y. Lee, & T. W. Nam. (2008). The Study on Undergraduates' Information Literacy Scale Development. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science, 42(4), 503-532. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.4.503
  20. B. G. Bak & H. S. Kang. (2006). Development and Validation of a Self-Report form of Integrative Creativity Scale. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 20(1), 155-177.
  21. J. K. Kwon & M. K. Chung. (2014). Development of Test for Core Competency of Engineering College Students. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 26(4), 687-716. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2014.26.4.687
  22. M. S. Kim. (2007). Factor Construct and Other Psychometric Characteristics of KICE Critical Thinking Test as a Complex Higher-Order Thinking Test. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 21(3), 513-537.
  23. H. K. Kang. (2014). The effects of discussion activities through fairy tales on young children's ability to carry out caring thinking. Korean Journal of Early Childhood Education Research, 16(1), 149-173. https://doi.org/10.15409/riece.2014.16.1.149
  24. Y. J. Joo, Y. N. Hong & S. Y. Lee. (2011). The Structural Relationship among Self-Regulated Learning, Perceived Usefulness of Learning, Perceived Ease of Use, Satisfaction, Academic Achievement, and Persistence in Cyber University. The Journal of Korea Education, 38(2), 55-79.
  25. L. M. Anderson. (2005). Classroom instruction. In knowledge base for the beginning teacher, ed. M. C. Reynolds, 101-115.
  26. K. I. van Der Zee & J. P. van Oudenhoven (2000). The Multicultural Personality Questionnaire: A multidimensional instrument of multicultural effectiveness. European Journal of Personality, 14(4), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0984(200007/08)14:4<291::AID-PER377>3.0.CO;2-6