Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy

Asian Society for Innovation and Policy (아시아기술혁신학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

From Knowledge Arbitrager to Policy Entrepreneur? Exploring the Role of Think Tank in the Open Innovation System

  • Seo, Il Won (Department of Economics, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Asmara, Anugerah Yuka (Directorate of Policy Formulation of Research, Technology, and Innnovation, National Innovation and Research Agency) ;
  • Kwon, Ki-Seok (Department of Public Policy, Hanbat National University)
  • Received : 2021.11.24
  • Accepted : 2021.12.30
  • Published : 2021.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study explores the role of the think tank as an intermediary organization in the open innovation system. Think tank has contributed to the policy process as a mediator between government and public and as a symbolic entity of intellectual innovation to produce knowledge to the public. As the innovation system matures, one of the major challenges in research and practice is the openness and collaboration in the science, technology, and innovation system. While previous literature highlighted the think tank as the knowledge arbitrager transforming ideas into policy issues, few studies address the research questions: Is the conventional role of the think tank still persistent in the open innovation system? What are the demanding roles? This paper tackles these questions by reviewing the current role of the South Korean think tank in the science & technology sector. Based on the open innovation framework, we suggest that think tanks need to play a bigger role as policy entrepreneurs, crossing policy borders and interacting with other partners.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the 2021 K-Innovation Program with Indonesia, funded by the Science, Technology Policy Institute of Korea.

References

  1. Abelson, D. E. (2002). Think tanks and US foreign policy: An historical perspective. US Foreign Policy Agenda, 7(3), 9-12.
  2. Arocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2000). Looking at national systems of innovation from the South. Industry and Innovation, 7(1), 55-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/713670247
  3. Baldwin, C., & Von Hippel, E. (2011). Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organization Science, 22(6), 1399-1417. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0618
  4. Beck, S., Bergenholtz, C., Bogers, M., Brasseur, T.-M., Conradsen, M. L., Marco, D. D., Distel, A. P., Dobusch, L., Dorler, D., Effert, A., Fecher, B., Filiou, D., Frederiksen, L., Gillier, T., Grimpe, C., Gruber, M., Haeussler, C., Heigl, F., Hoisl, K., Hyslop, K., Kokshagina, O., LaFlamme, M., Lawson, C., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Lukas, W., Nordberg, M., Norn, M. T., Poetz, M., Ponti, M., Pruschak, G., Priego, L. P., Radziwon, A., Rafner, J., Romanova, G., Ruser, A., Sauermann, H., Shah, S. K., Sherson, J. F., Suess-Reyes, J., Tucci, C. L., Tuertscher, P., Vedel, J. B., Velden, T., Verganti, R., Wareham, J., Wiggins, A., & Xu, S. M. (2020). The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach. Industry and Innovation, 1-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1792274
  5. Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2001). Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey [10.1093/icc/10.4.975]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 975-1005. https://doi.org/papers3://publication/doi/10.1093/icc/10.4.975
  6. Capello, R., & Lenzi, C. (2015). Knowledge, Innovation and Productivity Gains across European Regions [10.1080/00343404.2014.917167]. Regional Studies, 49(11), 1788-1804. https://doi.org/papers3://publication/doi/10.1080/00343404.2014.917167
  7. Caplan, N. (1979). The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization. American behavioral scientist, 22(3), 459-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427902200308
  8. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation. In: Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  9. Chesbrough, H. (2020). To recover faster from Covid-19, open up: Managerial implications from an open innovation perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 410-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.04.010
  10. Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. New Frontiers in Open Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Forthcoming, 3-28.
  11. Foray, D., & Lundvall, B. (1998). The knowledge-based economy: from the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. The economic impact of knowledge, 115-121.
  12. George, G., & Prabhu, G. N. (2003). Developmental financial institutions as technology policy instruments: implications for innovation and entrepreneurship in emerging economies. Research Policy, 32(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00002-1
  13. Guinan, E., Boudreau, K. J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2013). Experiments in Open Innovation at Harvard Medical School: What happens when an elite academic institution starts to rethink how research gets done? MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(3), 45.
  14. Hernando, M. G., Pautz, H., & Stone, D. (2018). Think tanks in 'hard times'-the Global Financial Crisis and economic advice. Policy and Society, 37(2), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1487181
  15. Hertog, P. D. (2000). Knowledge-intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 4(04), 491-528. https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391960000024X
  16. Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715-728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005
  17. James, S. (1998). Diane Stone, Capturing the Political Imagination: Think Tanks and the Political Process. In: Wiley Online Library.
  18. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Wernick, A. (2011). Paradoxical tensions in open innovation networks. European Journal of Innovation Management.
  19. Kipping, M., & Engwall, L. (2002). Management consulting: Emergence and dynamics of a knowledge industry. OUP Oxford.
  20. Kim, S., Ko, Y., Kwon, K.-S., Lee, C., Kim, J., Asmara, A. Pradana, A., Munawaroh, F. Sosa, S., Kusnandar, Sari, K., Hardiyati, R., Sani, S., Indraprahasta, G. Ramdhan, D., Akbar, M., Dinaseviani, A., & Supadmi, S. (2021), Survey Research on S&T Think-Tank, R&D Program Evaluation, and S&T Laws and Regulations in Indonesia, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
  21. Klerkx, L., A lvarez, R., & Campusano, R. (2014). The emergence and functioning of innovation intermediaries in maturing innovation systems: the case of Chile. Innovation and Development, 5(1), 73-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930x.2014.921268
  22. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2005). My precious. The role of appropriability strategies in shaping innovative performance. Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics, Working Paper(05-02).
  23. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic management journal, 27(2), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
  24. Lee, I. H., & Marvel, M. R. (2009). The moderating effects of home region orientation on R&D investment and international SME performance: Lessons from Korea. European management journal, 27(5), 316-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2009.04.011
  25. Lundvall, B.-A . (2016). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope, 85.
  26. Lundvall, B. A ., Joseph, K. J., Chaminade, C., & Vang, J. (2011). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries: building domestic capabilities in a global setting. https://doi.org/papers3://publication/uuid/EF3392A7-1DAF-4323-9DF7-758174112EBE
  27. McGann, J. G., & Weaver, R. K. (2000). Think tanks & civil societies: Catalysts for ideas and action. Routledge.
  28. McGann, J. G., & Weaver, R. K. (2002). Think tanks and civil societies in a time of change. Think tanks and civil societies: catalysts for ideas and action, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, 1-36.
  29. McGann, J. G. (2020) 2019 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks (Accessed: 2 May 2020).
  30. Nachiappan, K. (2013). Think tanks and the knowledge-policy nexus in China. Policy and Society, 32(3), 255-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.07.006
  31. Nooteboom, B. (2000). Institutions and forms of coordination in innovation systems. Organization Studies, 21(5), 915-939. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840600215004
  32. Rich, A. (2004). Think tanks, public policy, and the politics of expertise. Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
  33. Salles-Filho, S., Beatriz, M., & Bonacelli, M. (2010). Trends in the organization of public research organizations: lessons from the Brazilian case. Science and Public Policy, 37(3), 193-204. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X497708
  34. Selee, A. (2013) What Should Think Tanks Do? Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  35. Sherman, H. J., & Schultz, R. (1998). Open boundaries: Creating business innovation through complexity. Perseus books Reading, MA.
  36. Weiss, C. H. (1977). Research for policy's sake: The enlightenment function of social research. Policy analysis, 531-545.
  37. Wieczorek, A. J., & Hekkert, M. P. (2012). Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: A framework for policymakers and innovation scholars. Science and Public Policy, 39(1), 74-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scr008