International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering

The Society of Naval Architects of Korea (대한조선학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Application of surf-riding and broaching mode based on IMO second-generation intact stability criteria for previous ships

  • Shin, Dong Min (Institute for Security Convergence Research, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)) ;
  • Moon, Byung Young (Department of Shipbuilding and Ocean Engineering, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Chung, Jaeho (Institute for Security Convergence Research, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST))
  • Received : 2021.01.18
  • Accepted : 2021.07.01
  • Published : 2021.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

International Maritime Organization (IMO) have recently discussed the technical problems related to the second-generation intact stability criteria of ships. The second-generation intact stability criteria refer to five modes of vulnerability when the ship sailing in the ocean. In this study, we described a method to verify the criteria of the surf-riding/broaching. In case that Lv1 (Level 1) vulnerability criteria is not satisfied based on the relatively simple calculation using the Froude number (Fn), we presented the calculation procedure for the Lv2 (Level 2) criteria considering the hydrodynamics in waves. The results were reviewed based on the data for given previous ships. In absence of ship-specific data, a similar Lv2 result was confirmed by comparing the result obtained by calculating the added mass with the case where the added mass was 10% of the ship mass. This result will contribute to basic ship design process according to the IMO draft regulation.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was a part of the project titled Development of Verification Technology of the IMO 2nd Generation Stability Criteria for improving ship Safety, funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea (20180318).

References

  1. Ananiev, D.M., 1996. On Surf-Riding in Following Seas, vol. 13. Transaction of Krylov Society, pp. 169-176.
  2. Artyszuk, J., 2003. Wave fraction and thrust deduction during ship astern Manoeuvres. WIT Trans. Built Environ. 68.
  3. Belenky, V., Bassler, C.C., Spyrou, K.J., 2011. Development of Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria. Hydromechanics Department Report. Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division-50-TR-2011/065.
  4. Grim, O., 1951. Das Schiff in von achtern auflaufender See. Jahrbuch der Schiffbautechnischen Gesellschaft. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 264-287.
  5. IMO, 2015a. Draft Guidelines of Direct Stability Assessment Procedures for Use with the Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria. SDC 2/WP.4.
  6. IMO, 2015b. Draft Guidelines of Direct Stability Assessment Procedures for Use with the Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria. SDC 3/6/6.
  7. IMO, 2015c. Draft Guidelines of Direct Stability Assessment Procedures for Use with the Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria. SDC 3/INF.10.
  8. IMO, 2016a. Draft Guidelines of Direct Stability Assessment Procedures for Use with the Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria. SDC 3/WP.5.
  9. IMO, 2016b. Draft Guidelines of Direct Stability Assessment Procedures for Use with the Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria. SDC 4/5/4.
  10. IMO, 2017a. Draft Guidelines of Direct Stability Assessment Procedures for Use with the Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria. SDC 4/WP.4 Annex 1.
  11. IMO, 2017b. Draft Guidelines of Direct Stability Assessment Procedures for Use with the Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria. SDC 5/INF 4 Add.1.
  12. IMO, 2019a. Draft Guidelines of Direct Stability Assessment Procedures for Use with the Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria. SDC 6/WP.6.
  13. IMO, 2019b. Draft Guidelines of Direct Stability Assessment Procedures for Use with the Second Generation Intact Stability Criteria, SDC 7/INF.2.
  14. Kan, M., 1990. A guideline to avoid the dangerous surf-riding. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Stability of Ships and Ocean Vehicles. University Federico II of Naples, pp. 90-97.
  15. Kracht, A.M., Jacobsen, A., 1992. D-series systematic experiments with models of fast twin-screw displacement ship. SNAME Trans. 100, 199-222.
  16. Kuznetsov, Y.A., 2004. Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, third ed. Springer Science & Business Media.
  17. Lee, C., Kang, C., 2004. Hull form study for 21C 13K chemical tanker. In: KRISO Model Test Report. No. BSIO2610-04601E.
  18. Maki, A., Umeda, N., Renilson, M., Ueta, T., 2010. Analytical formulae for predicting the surf-riding threshold for a ship in following seas. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 15 (3), 218-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-010-0085-y
  19. Makov, Y., 1969. Some Results of Theoretical Analysis of Surf-Riding in Following Seas, vol. 126. Transaction of Krylov Society, pp. 124-128.
  20. Motora, S., 1960. On the measurement of added mass and added moment of inertia for ship motions Part 2. Added mass Abstract for the longitudinal motions. J. Zosen Kiokai 1960 (106), 59-62. https://doi.org/10.2534/jjasnaoe1952.1960.a59
  21. Spyrou, K.J., 2001. The Nonlinear Dynamics of Ships in Broaching, vol. 1. Marie Curie Fellowships Annals.
  22. Umeda, N., 1990. Probabilistic study on surf-riding of a ship in irregular following seas. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Stability of Ships and Ocean Vehicles. University Federico II of Naples, pp. 336-343.
  23. Zheng, Y.H., You, Y.G., Shen, Y.M., 2004. On the radiation and diffraction of water waves by a rectangular buoy. Ocean Eng. 31 (8-9), 1063-1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2003.10.012