DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Modified thrust empirical formula of a flapping foil by including the effects of azimuth angles

  • Kumar, Rupesh (School of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, University of Ulsan) ;
  • Shin, Hyunkyoung (School of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, University of Ulsan)
  • Received : 2020.10.05
  • Accepted : 2021.02.03
  • Published : 2021.11.30

Abstract

Wave energy is one of the most available sources of renewable energy in the world. It has been previously proven that the flapping foil can generate thrust forces using energy from the surface waves and an empirical formula was proposed to predict the thrust forces generated by a flapping foil consist of NACA0015 section (Kumar and Shin, 2019a). However, the proposed empirical formula was restricted to the head waves i.e. 0° azimuth angle which was not useful for the flapping foils encountering with oblique and following waves. Therefore, in this study, the thrust empirical formula was modified to include the effects of azimuth angles based on the experimentally obtained data. And the modified empirical equations were validated by the combination of foils experimentally.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (No. 20203040020070), and the Korea Electric Power Corporation (No. R18XA03)

References

  1. Ashraf, M.A., Young, J., Lai, J.C.S., 2011. Reynolds number, thickness and camber effects on flapping airfoil propulsion. J. Fluids Struct. 27 (2), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2010.11.010.
  2. Bandyopadhyay, P.R., 2005. Trends in biorobotic autonomous undersea vehicles. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng 30 (1), 109-139. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2005.843748,8450046.
  3. Bockmann, E., Steen, S., 2014. Experiments with actively pitch-controlled and spring-loaded oscillating foils. Appl. Ocean Res. 48, 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2014.09.004
  4. Evangelos, S.F., 2015. Augmenting ship propulsion in waves using flapping foils initially designed for roll stabilization. In: YSC 2015 4th International Young Scientists Conference on Computational Science. Elsevier B. V., Athens, pp. 103-111.
  5. Filippas, E.S., Belibassakis, K.A., 2014. Hydrodynamic analysis of flapping-foil thrusters operating beneath the free surface and in waves. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 40, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2014.01.008
  6. Fish, F.E., 2013. Advantages of natural propulsive systems. Mar. Technol. Soc. J. 47, 37-44. https://doi.org/10.4031/MTSJ.47.5.2
  7. FREYMUTH, P., 1988. Propulsive vortical signature of plunging and pitching airfoils. AIAA J. 26 (7), 881-883. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.9982
  8. Hover, F.S., Haugsdal, Triantafyllou, M.S., 2004. Effect of angle of attack profiles in flapping foil propulsion. J. Fluid Struct. 19 (1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2003.10.003.
  9. Isshiki, H., 1982. A theory of wave devouring propulsion (2nd report). J. Soc. Nav. Archit. Jpn. 1982 (152), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.2534/jjasnaoe1968.1982.152_89.
  10. Isshiki, H., 1984. A theory of wave devouring propulsion (4th report). J. Soc. Nav. Archit. Jpn. 151, 54-64.
  11. Isshiki, H., Murakami, M., 1983. A theory of wave devouring propulsion (3rd report) - an experimental verification of thrust generation by a passive-type hydrofoil propulsor. J. Soc. Nav. Archit. Jpn. 1983 (154), 118-128. https://doi.org/10.2534/jjasnaoe1968.1983.154_118.
  12. Kumar, R., Shin, H., 2019. Thrust estimation of a flapping foil attached to an elastic plate using multiple regression analysis [Internet] Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2092678218302413.
  13. Kumar, R., Shin, H., 2019. Thrust prediction of an active flapping foil in waves using CFD. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. [Internet] 7 (11). Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/7/11/396.
  14. Lee, J., Choi, H., Kim, H.Y., 2015. A scaling law for the lift of hovering insects. J. Fluid Mech. 782, 479-490. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.568.
  15. Lewin, G.C., Haj-Hariri, H., 2003. Modelling thrust generation of a two-dimensional heaving airfoil in a viscous flow. J. Fluid Mech. 492, 339-362. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112003005743.
  16. Liu, Peng, Liu, Yebao, Huang, Shuling, Jianfeng Zhao, Y.S., 2018. Effects of regular waves on propulsion performance of flexible flapping foil. Appl. Sci. 8, 934. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8060934
  17. MacKowski, A.W., Williamson, C.H.K., 2017. Effect of pivot location and passive heave on propulsion from a pitching airfoil. Phys. Rev. Fluids 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.013101.
  18. Platzer, M.F., Jones, K.D., Young, J., Lai, J.C.S., 2008. Flapping-wing aerodynamics: progress and challenges. AIAA J. 46 (9) https://doi.org/10.2514/1.29263.
  19. Politis, G.K., Tsarsitalidis, V.T., 2014. Flapping wing propulsor design: an approach based on systematic 3D-BEM simulations. Ocean Eng. 84 (1), 98-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.04.002.
  20. Prempraneerach, P., Hover, F.S., Triantafyllou, M.S., 2003. The effect of chordwise flexibility on the thrust and efficiency of a flapping foil. Int. Symp. Unmanned Untethered Submers. Technol.
  21. Ramamurti, R., Geder, J., Palmisano, J., Ratna, B., Sandberg, W.C., 2010. Computations of flapping flow propulsion for unmanned underwater vehicle design. AIAA J. 48 (1) https://doi.org/10.2514/1.43389.
  22. Schouveiler, L., Hover, F.S., Triantafyllou, M.S., 2005. Performance of flapping foil propulsion. J. Fluids Struct. 20 (7), 949-959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2005.05.009.
  23. Shyy, W., Aono, H., Chimakurthi, S.K., Trizila, P., Kang, C.K., Cesnik, C.E.S., et al., 2010. Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. Prog. Aero. Sci. 46 (7), 284-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.01.001.
  24. Sim, Woolim, Kumar, Rupesh, Yu, Youngjae, Kim, Junbae, Seo Beongcheon, S.H., 2018. Experimental study of the stationkeeping system of a floater using flapping foils in waves. In: 8th PAAMES and AMEC. Busan, Korea, pp. 359-362.
  25. Terao, Y., Isshiki, H., 1991. Wave devouring propulsion sea trial. In: Eighteenth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, pp. 287-296.
  26. Ulysses, S., 1958. Harkson; San Mateo; WATER CRAFT HAVING HYDROPLANES, 2,821,948 United States Patent Office, Claim. (CI. 114-66.5). 2,821,948 United States Patent Office.
  27. von Ellenrieder, K.D., Parker, K., Soria, J., 2003. Flow structures behind a heaving and pitching finite-span wing. J. Fluid Mech. 490, 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112003005408.
  28. Wu, T., 1972. Extraction of flow energy by a wing oscillating in waves. J. Ship Res. 14 (1), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.5957/jsr.1972.16.1.66
  29. Young, J., Lai, J.C.S., 2007. On the aerodynamic forces of a plunging airfoil. J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 1388 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03177425.
  30. Yu, J., Tan, M., Wang, S., Chen, E., 2004. Development of a biomimetic robotic fish and its control algorithm. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 34, 1789-1810.