DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Expressions of Rhizomatic Escape by Deleuze and Guattari - Song Hayoung With a focus on paintings and objet works -

들뢰즈와 가타리의 리좀적 탈주 표현 연구 -송하영 회화·오브제작품을 중심으로-

  • Received : 2021.09.30
  • Accepted : 2021.10.18
  • Published : 2021.11.30

Abstract

This study set out to investigate the forms, attributes, and escape methods of post-subjects projected on the investigator's works in connection with rhizomatic thinking proposed as a way of social transformation by Deleuze and Guattari and examine their social connotations. Post-subjects projected on the investigator's works are not completed wholes of some sort, but like materials whose constant premise is change and creation. In the investigator's works, post-subjects have conscious and unconscious desire. It is the desire of creation with positive attributes including Deleuze's and Guattari's pursuit of changes in a contradicting society. When desire is deployed in post-subjects, they will carry out an escape. This way of escape is rhizomatic proposed by Deleuze and Guattari. It deconstructs contradicting things and repeats connection, contact, and severance with the outside world, building a new order. Rhizomatic post-subjects appearing in the investigator's works depict the escape process and method in abstract ways through the variable installation of objets combined with a color field of repeating brushes. In this work, the goal of post-subjects is to make a safe landing in a space where beings are recognized for their values and free and creative lives. These post-subjects are nomads creating a new landscape continuously, wandering around vast plains, and also artists and literary figures resisting a contradicting society. That is, they are connected to the concept of a war machine proposed by Deleuze and Guattari as a concept of social transformation and to the concept of Nietzsche's Agon to devise and create new values and politics based on street passion. They seek after a space where they can co-exist with otherness recognized rather than the complete deconstruction of the old order.

연구자의 작품에 투영되어 있는 탈주체의 형상과 속성, 그리고 탈주 방식 등을 들뢰즈와 가타리가 사회 변혁의 방식으로 제시한 리좀적 사유에 연결시켜 살펴보고, 그것이 사회적으로 어떠한 의미를 내포하고 있는지 밝혀보았다. 연구자의 작품에 투영된 탈주체는 어떤 완성체가 아니며 언제나 변화와 생성을 전제하고 있는 질료와 같은 것이다. 이 탈주체는 유·무의식적 욕망이 존재한다. 이 욕망은 들뢰즈와 가타리가 모순된 사회 변화를 추구하는 등의 긍정적 속성을 지닌 생성의 욕망이다. 탈주체에 이 욕망을 배치하게 되면 탈주을 감행한다. 이 탈주 방식은 들뢰즈와 가타리가 제시한 리좀적이다. 이것은 모순된 것을 해체하고, 외부와의 연결·접속과 단절을 반복하면서 새로운 질서를 생성한다. 작품에 등장하는 리좀적 탈주체는 반복적 붓질을 한 색면과 결합된 오브제를 가변 설치하여 탈주하는 과정과 방식을 추상적으로 표현한 것이다. 이 작품에서 탈주하는 탈주체들의 목표는 존재자들의 가치와 자유롭고 창조적인 삶을 인정하는 공간으로 안전하게 착륙하는 것이다. 이 탈주체들은 드넓은 초원을 유동하면서 끊임없이 새로운 풍경을 생성하는 노마드이며, 모순된 사회에 저항하는 예술가, 문학가, 즉 들뢰즈와 가타리가 사회 변혁의 개념으로 제시한 전쟁기계와 거리의 열정을 만들며 새로운 가치와 정치를 창안·창조하는 니체의 아곤 개념과 연결된다. 이들이 추구하는 것은 기존 질서를 완전 해체하는 것이 아니며, 타자성을 인정하는 가운데 공존할 수 있는 공간을 희망한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, "A Thousand Plateaus," translated by Kim Jaein, saemulgyul Publishing House, pp. 47~48, p. 54, 2003.
  2. Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, "A Thousand Plateaus," translated by Kim Jaein, saemulgyul Publishing House, p. 19, 2003.
  3. Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, "A Thousand Plateaus," translated by Kim Jaein, saemulgyul Publishing House, p. 20, 2003.
  4. Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, "A Thousand Plateaus," translated by Kim Jaein, saemulgyul Publishing House, p. 21, 2003.
  5. Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, "A Thousand Plateaus," translated by Kim Jaein, saemulgyul Publishing House, p. 24, 2003.
  6. Park Youngwook "Derrida & Deleuze On the border between meaning and meaninglessness," gimm-young Publishers, p. 115, 2009.
  7. Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, "A Thousand Plateaus," translated by Kim Jaein, saemulgyul Publishing House, p. 30, 2003.
  8. YI Jinkyung, "Nomadism 1," Humanist, p. 106, 2002.
  9. Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, "A Thousand Plateaus," translated by Kim Jaein, saemulgyul Publishing House, p. 30, 2003.
  10. Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, "A Thousand Plateaus," translated by Kim Jaein, saemulgyul Publishing House, p. 21, 2003.
  11. Kim Yejin.Lee Gyoobaek, "A Study on the Ambiguity of Boundaries based on a Visual Percepti on," Korean Society of Basic Design & Art, Vol.13 No.5, pp. 62~63, 2012.
  12. Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, "A Thousand Plateaus," translated by Kim Jaein, saemulgyul Publishing House, p. 92, 2003.
  13. Chun Kyungkap, "The Control of Desire and Escape - From Spinoza to Deleuze," p. 234. pp. 240~243, 2004. Please refer to.
  14. Choi JinA, "Philosophical meaning and value of Deleuze'sontology of desire :Becoming, creation, and practice and revolution as practical impe ratives," pp. 270~271, 2016.
  15. Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, "Anti-Oedipus," translated by Kim Jaein, Minumsa, pp. 61-62, 2019. Deleuze and Guattari said that desire is produced in reality.
  16. Park Chungja, "The age of simulacra," Book publishing, guiparang, p. 211, 2019.
  17. YI Jinkyung, "Nomadism 2," Humanist, p. 298, 2002.