DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring Critical Risk Factors of Office Building Projects

  • NGUYEN, Phong Thanh (Department of Project Management, Ho Chi Minh City Open University) ;
  • PHAM, Cuong Phu (Faculty of Transport and Economics, Campus in Ho Chi Minh City, University of Transport and Communications) ;
  • PHAN, Phuong Thanh (Department of Project Management, Ho Chi Minh City Open University) ;
  • VU, Ngoc Bich (School of Advanced Study, Ho Chi Minh City Open University) ;
  • DUONG, My Tien Ha (Faculty of Economics and Public Management, Ho Chi Minh City Open University) ;
  • NGUYEN, Quyen Le Hoang Thuy To (Office of Cooperation and Research Management, Ho Chi Minh City Open University)
  • Received : 2020.08.04
  • Accepted : 2021.01.08
  • Published : 2021.02.28

Abstract

Risks and uncertainty are unavoidable problems in management of projects. Therefore, project managers should not only prevent risks, but also have to respond and manage them. Risk management has become a critical interest subject in the construction industry for both practitioners and researchers. This paper presents critical risk factors of office building projects in the construction phase in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Data was collected through a questionnaire survey based on the likelihood and consequence level of risk factors. These factors fell into five groups: (i) financial risk factors; (ii) management risk factors; (iii) schedule risk factors; (iv) construction risk factors; and (v) environment risk factors. The research results showed that critical factors affecting office building projects are natural (i.e., prolonged rain, storms, climate effects) and human-made issues (i.e., soil instability, safety behaviors, owner's design change) and the schedule-related risk factors contributed to the most significant risks for office buildings projects in the construction phase in Ho Chi Minh City. They give construction management and project management practitioners a new perspective on risks and risk management of office buildings projects in Ho Chi Minh City and are proactive in the awareness, response, and management of risk factors comprehensively.

Keywords

References

  1. Akintoye, A. S., & MacLeod, M. J. (1997). Risk analysis and management in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 15(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00035-X
  2. Bing, L., Akintoye, A., Edwards, P. J., & Hardcastle, C. (2005). The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK. International Journal of Project Management, 23(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.04.006
  3. Bing, L., & Tiong, R. L. (1999). Risk management model for international construction joint ventures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(5), 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:5(377)
  4. Dang, C. N., Le-Hoai, L., Kim, S.-Y., Van Nguyen, C., Lee, Y.-D., & Lee, S.-H. (2017). Identification of risk patterns in Vietnamese road and bridge construction. Built Environment Project and Asset Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-11-2015-0065
  5. Do, S. T., Likhitruangsilp, V., Tran, K. T., & Nguyen P. T. (2017). Risk assessment for international construction joint ventures in Vietnam. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 4(6), 104-114. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.06.015
  6. Kapila, P., & Hendrickson, C. (2001). Exchange rate risk management in international construction ventures. Journal of Management in Engineering, 17(4), 186-191. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2001)17:4(186)
  7. Ke, Y., Wang, S., & Chan, A. P. (2012). Risk management practice in China's Public-Private Partnership projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 18(5), 675-684. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.723380
  8. Lee, J. W., & Xuan, Y. (2019). Effects of technology and innovation management and total factor productivity on the economic growth of China. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 6(2), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no2.63
  9. Likhitruangsilp, V., Do, S. T., & Onishi, M. (2017). A comparative study on the risk perceptions of the public and private sectors in public-private partnership (PPP) transportation projects in Vietnam. Engineering Journal, 21(7), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2017.21.7.213
  10. Likhitruangsilp, V., & Ioannou, P. G. (2009). Risk allocation in standard forms of general conditions for tunneling contracts. Paper presented at the Construction Research Congress 2009: Building a Sustainable Future. https://doi.org/10.1061/41020(339)127
  11. Likhitruangsilp, V., & Ioannou, P. G. (2012). Analysis of riskresponse measures for tunneling projects. Paper presented at the Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412329.027
  12. Luong, D. L., Tran, D. H., & Nguyen, P. T. (2019). Hybrid multiple objective evolutionary algorithms for optimising multi-mode time, cost and risk trade-off problem. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 60(3), 203-214. doi:10.1504/IJCAT.2019.100299
  13. Luong, D. L., Tran, D. H., & Nguyen, P. T. (2018). Optimizing multi-mode time-cost-quality trade-off of construction project using opposition multiple objective difference evolution. International Journal of Construction Management, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1526630
  14. Mathew, S., Tran, D., & Nguyen, L. D. (2018). Examining impact of risk on cost growth in design-build projects using structural equation modeling. Paper presented at the Construction Research Congress 2018. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481271.064
  15. Mulholland, B., & Christian, J. (1999). Risk assessment in construction schedules. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 125(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:1(8)
  16. Nguyen, H. M., & Bui, N. H. (2020a). Energy consumption - Economic growth nexus in Vietnam: An ARDL approach with a structural break. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(1), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no1.101
  17. Nguyen, H. M., & Bui, N. H. (2020b). Revisiting the relationship between energy consumption and economic growth nexus in Vietnam: new evidence by asymmetric ARDL cointegration. Applied Economics Letters, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1789543
  18. Nguyen, H. M., & Ngo, T. T. (2020). Psychological capital, organizational commitment and job performance: A case in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(5), 269-278. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO5.269
  19. Nguyen, P.T, & Nguyen, C. P. (2020). Risk Management in Engineering and Construction: A Case Study in Design-Build Projects in Vietnam. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 10(1), 5237-5241. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.3286
  20. Nguyen, P. T. (2020). Attitude of construction workers toward labour safety. International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, 10(2-3), 181-193. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBCRM.2020.108507
  21. Nguyen, P. T., & Nguyen, Q. L. H. T. T. (2020). Critical Factors Affecting Construction Price Index: An Integrated Fuzzy Logic and Analytical Hierarchy Process. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(8), 197-204. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.197
  22. Nguyen, P. T., & Likhitruangsilp, V. (2017). Identification risk factors affecting concession period length for public-private partnership infrastructure projects. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(6), 342-348.
  23. Nguyen, P. T., Likhitruangsilp, V., & Onishi, M. (2020). Success factors for public-private partnership infrastructure projects in Vietnam. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 10(2), 858-865. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.10.2.5839
  24. Nguyen, T. A., & Nguyen, P. T. (2015). Explaining model for supervisor's behavior on safety action based on their perceptions. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 10(20), 9562-9572.
  25. Owolabi, H. A., Oyedele, L. O., Alaka, H. A., Ajayi, S. O., Akinade, O. O., & Bilal, M. (2020). Critical success factors for ensuring bankable completion risk in PFI/PPP megaprojects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(1), 04019032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000717
  26. Pham, C. P., Nguyen, P. T, Phan, P. T., Nguyen, Q. L. H. T. T., N., Le, L. P., & Duong, M. T. H. Risk Factors Affecting Equipment Management in Construction Firms. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(11), 347-356. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.347
  27. Phong, N. T., Likhitruangsilp, V., & Onishi, M. (2017). Developing a stochastic traffic volume prediction model for public-private partnership projects. Paper presented at the AIP Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5011564
  28. Ren, H. (1994). Risk lifecycle and risk relationships on construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 12(2), 68-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(94)90012-4
  29. Shen, L. Y. (1997). Project risk management in Hong Kong. International Journal of Project Management, 15(2), 101-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00045-2
  30. Shen, L. Y., Wu, G. W., & Ng, C. S. (2001). Risk assessment for construction joint ventures in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(1), 76-81. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:1(76)
  31. Vo, K. D., Nguyen, P. T., Nguyen Q. L. H. T. T. (2020). Disputes in Managing Projects: A Case Study of Construction Industry in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(8), 635-644. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.635
  32. Yap, J. B. H., Chow, I. N., & Shavarebi, K. (2019). Criticality of construction industry problems in developing countries: Analyzing Malaysian projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(5), 04019020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000709

Cited by

  1. Sustainability of Business through Project Risk Identification with Use of Expert Estimates vol.13, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116311