DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of Chemical Pesticides Use in a Social Accounting Matrix Framework: A Case Study of Thailand

  • Received : 2020.11.05
  • Accepted : 2021.01.08
  • Published : 2021.02.28

Abstract

Although there are several studies on the impact of pesticides use, there is no consistent conclusion about such evidence on capturing the socioeconomic independence. The propose of this paper is to investigate the economy-wide impact of pesticide use in Thailand. The research data and methodology in this paper are depended on a social accounting matrix framework incorporating the pesticide-related illness as an additional sector, following Resosudarmo and Thorbecke (1998), to explain the impact of the pesticides on the related agricultural sector, food sector, and the social welfare of different households. Thus, the main characteristics of the Thai economy can be comprehensively described by providing information contained in this framework. In this respect, the several data sets are constructed to include the economic and social structure interdependencies, which are necessary to analyze the policy implications, especially industrial policy. The results were analyzed according to the general equilibrium theory and the Leontief multiplier matrix. It reveals that the food industry and the economy are significantly affected by the pesticides. One of the most interesting findings of this paper suggest that the food sector needs to determine its output to avoid bottleneck situations and create equality across the food production system.

Keywords

References

  1. Aujirapongpan, S., Ru-Zhe, J., & Jutidharabongse, J. (2020). Strategic Intuition Capability toward Performance of Entrepreneurs: Evidence from Thailand. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(6), 465-473. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.465
  2. Baharuddin, M. R. B., Sahid, I. B., Noor, M. A. B. M., Sulaiman, N., & Othman, F. (2011). Pesticide risk assessment: a study on inhalation and dermal exposure to 2, 4-D and paraquat among Malaysian paddy farmers. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, 46(7), 600-607. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2011.589309
  3. Bailey, A. P., Rehman, T., Park, J., Keatinge, J. D. H., & Tranter, R. B. (1999). Towards a method for the economic evaluation of environmental indicators for UK integrated arable farming systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 72(2), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(98)00171-6
  4. Breisinger, C., Thomas, M., & Thurlow, J. (2009). Social accounting matrices and multiplier analysis: An introduction with exercises (Vol. 5). International Food Policy Research Institute.
  5. Callahan, C. L., Hamad, L. A., Olson, J. R., Ismail, A. A., AbdelRasoul, G., Hendy, O., & Bonner, M. R. (2017). Longitudinal assessment of occupational determinants of chlorpyrifos exposure in adolescent pesticide workers in Egypt. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 220(8), 1356-1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.09.006
  6. Evans, R. (1995). Soil erosion and land use: towards a sustainable policy. Proceedings of the seventh Professional Environmental Seminar. Cambridge, UK: White Horse Press.
  7. Gawarammana, I. B., & Buckley, N. A. (2011). Medical management of paraquat ingestion. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 72(5), 745-757. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04026.x
  8. Grovermann, C., Schreinemachers, P., Riwthong, S., & Berger, T. (2017). 'Smart'policies to reduce pesticide use and avoid income trade-offs: An agent-based model applied to Thai agriculture. Ecological Economics, 132, 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.031
  9. Hareebin, Y. (2020). Factors Affecting Human Capital and Innovative Entrepreneurial Capabilities of Tour Operators: Evidence from Andaman Coast, Thailand. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.359
  10. Hayden, C., & Round, J. I. (1982). Developments in social accounting methods as applied to the analysis of income distribution and employment issues. World Development, 10(6), 451-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(82)90002-X
  11. Lee, W. J., Blair, A., Hoppin, J. A., Lubin, J. H., Rusiecki, J. A., Sandler, D. P., & Alavanja, M. C. (2004). Cancer incidence among pesticide applicators exposed to chlorpyrifos in the Agricultural Health Study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 96(23), 1781-1789. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh324
  12. Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Mullen, J. (1995). Estimating environmental and human health benefits of reducing pesticide use through integrated pest management programs. Blacksburg, VA: Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech.
  14. Myers, J. P., Antoniou, M. N., Blumberg, B., Carroll, L., Colborn, T., Everett, L. G., ... & Vandenberg, L. N. (2016). Concerns over use of glyphosate-based herbicides and risks associated with exposures: a consensus statement. Environmental Health, 15(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0117-0
  15. Parvez, S., Gerona, R. R., Proctor, C., Friesen, M., Ashby, J. L., Reiter, J. L., ... & Winchester, P. D. (2018). Glyphosate exposure in pregnancy and shortened gestational length: a prospective Indiana birth cohort study. Environmental Health, 17(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0367-0
  16. Pienkhuntod, A., Amornbunchornvei, C., & Nantharath, P. (2020). Quantitative Analysis of Poverty Indicators: The Case of Khon Kaen Province, Thailand. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(2), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no2.131
  17. Pimentel, D., Acquay, H., Biltonen, M., Rice, P., Silva, M., Nelson, J., ... & D'amore, M. (1992). Environmental and economic costs of pesticide use. BioScience, 42(10), 750-760. https://doi.org/10.2307/1311994
  18. Pimentel, D., Harvey, C., Resosudarmo, P., Sinclair, K., Kurz, D., McNair, M., ... & Blair, R. (1995). Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science, 267(5201), 1117-1123. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.267.5201.1117
  19. Praneetvatakul, S., Schreinemachers, P., Pananurak, P., & Tipraqsa, P. (2013). Pesticides, external costs and policy options for Thai agriculture. Environmental Science & Policy, 27, 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.019
  20. Pretty, J. N., Brett, C., Gee, D., Hine, R. E., Mason, C. F., Morison, J. I. L., ... & Dobbs, T. L. (2000). Policy reforms and the external costs of agriculture. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44(2), 263-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560123782
  21. Pyatt, G., & Round, J. I. (1979). Accounting and fixed price multipliers in a social accounting matrix framework. The Economic Journal, 89(356), 850-873. https://doi.org/10.2307/2231503
  22. Resosudarmo, B. P., & Thorbecke, E. (1998). Reducing the number of pesticide-related illnesses: The impact on household incomes in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 34(2), 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074919812331337370
  23. Silver, M. K., Shao, J., Zhu, B., Chen, M., Xia, Y., Kaciroti, N., & Meeker, J. D. (2017). Prenatal naled and chlorpyrifos exposure is associated with deficits in infant motor function in a cohort of Chinese infants. Environment International, 106, 248-256. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.envint.2017.05.015
  24. Tarp, F., Roland-Holst, D., & Rand, J. (2002). Trade and income growth in Vietnam: estimates from a new social accounting matrix. Economic Systems Research, 14(2), 157-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310220140951
  25. World Bank. (2020). The World Bank in Thailand: an overview. Retrieved December 3, 2020 from https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/thailand/overview.
  26. Yang, J. (2019). Reducing poverty and improving equity in Thailand: Why it still matters, Retrieved December 3, 2020 from https://blogs.worldbank.org/eastasiapacific/reducingpoverty-and-improving-equity-thailand-why-it-still-matters.