The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business

Korea Distribution Science Association (한국유통과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Impact of Environmental Protection Tax on Plastic Bag Use: A Case Study of Vietnam

  • TONG, Hong Lam (Faculty of Economics and Public Management, Ho Chi Minh City Open University) ;
  • DUONG, Tien Ha My (Faculty of Economics and Public Management, Ho Chi Minh City Open University)
  • Received : 2020.11.05
  • Accepted : 2021.01.08
  • Published : 2021.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The study investigates the impact of the environmental protection tax, along with other factors such as attitude, subjective norm, environmental concern, and the availability of substitutes on the use of plastic bags in Vietnam. To achieve this objective, a questionnaire was prepared for data collection. The questionnaire employed a 5-point Likert scale with "completely disagree" at 1 and "completely agree" at 5. A total of 327 questionnaires were returned. However, only 291 valid responders were used in the analysis. The Cronbach's Alpha and the exploratory factor analysis were applied to test the scale reliability and discover the structure of the scales. Afterwards, we conducted the confirmatory factor analysis and the structural equation modeling to analyze collected data. The study shows that attitude is an important factor influencing the plastic bag use of consumers. Other factors that also lead to a decline in plastic bags are subjective norm and environmental concern. Meanwhile, the availability of substitutes does not affect consumers' green behavior. Moreover, the major findings of the research suggest the relationship between the environmental protection tax and the use of plastic bags is not statistically significant. In other words, tax policy may fail to change the habit of using plastic bags in Vietnam.

Keywords

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. ANTV Reporters (2019). "White pollution" - the numbers are alarming. Retrieved December 1, 2020 from http://www.antv.gov.vn/tin-tuc/xa-hoi/o-nhiem-trang-%E2%80%93-nhungcon-so-dang-bao-dong-300119.html
  3. Biel, A., & Thogersen, J., 2007. Activation of social norms in social dilemmas: a review of the evidence and reflections on the implications for environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2006.03.003
  4. Birgelen, M., Semeijn, J., & Keicher, M. (2009). Packaging and Pro-environmental Consumption Behavior: Investigating Purchase and Disposal Decisions for Beverages. Environment and Behavior, 41(1), 125-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507311140.
  5. De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(2), 363-385. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2005.00019.x
  6. Do, L. (2019). Public reluctance impedes fight against plastic. Retrieved December 1, 2020 from https://e.vnexpress.net/news/life/trend/public-reluctance-impedes-fight-againstplastic-4001319.html
  7. Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: conceptual and measurement issues. In: R. E. Dunlap & W. Michelson (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Sociology (pp. 482-524). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
  8. Earth Policy Institute. (2014). Plastic bag regulations worldwide. Retrieved November 25, 2020 from http:// www.earth-policy.org/data_center/C26.
  9. Eze, U. C., & Ndubisi, N. O. (2013). Green buyer behavior: evidence from Asia consumers. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 48(4), 413-426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909613493602
  10. Fishbein, M. (1967). A behavior theory approach to the relations between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward the object. In: M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (pp. 389-400). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  11. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention And Behavior. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  12. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980.
  13. Gleim, M. R., Smith, J. S., Andrews, D., & Cronin, J. J., Jr. (2013). Against the green: A multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. Journal of Retailing, 89(1), 44-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2012.10.001.
  14. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.
  15. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  16. Hansla, A., Gamble, A., Juliusson, A., & Garling, T. (2008). The Relationships between Awareness of Consequences, Environmental Concern, and Value Orientations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.004.
  17. Hoang, T. B. T (2016). Factors affecting the relationship between Vietnamese consumers' green consumption intentions and behaviors. Doctoral thesis. VNU University of Economics and Business.
  18. Hoang, T. H., Huynh, T. T. Q and Huynh, T. N. (2018). Factors affecting green consumption behavior of consumers in Hue city. Hue University Journal of Science, 127(5A), 1999-212.
  19. Hee, S. P. (2000). Relationships among attitudes and subjective norm: Testing the theory of reasoned action across cultures. Communication Studies, 51(2), 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970009388516
  20. Hines, J., Hungerford, H., & Tomera, A. (1987). Analysis and Syntheses of research on environmental behaviour: A metaanalysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1987.9943482
  21. Ho, L. T. T., & Phan, T. P. T. (2018). Applying the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to analyze pro-environmental behavioral intentions of domestic tourists in Can Tho city. Can Tho University Journal of Science, 54(9D), 124-132.
  22. Hu, H. H., Parsa, H. G., & Self, J. (2010). The Dynamics of Green Restaurant Patronage. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 51(3), 344-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965510370564
  23. Jambeck, J. R., Andrady, A., Geyer, R., Narayan, R., Perryman, M., Siegler, T., Wilcox, C., & Lavender, K. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean, Science, 347, 768-771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352
  24. Kim, Y., & Choi, S. R. (2005). Antecedents of green purchase behaviour: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern and PCE. Advances in Consumer Research, 32(1), 592-599.
  25. Kotchen, M., & Reiling, S. D. (2000). Environmental Attitudes, Motivations, and Contingent Valuation of Nonuse Values: A Case Study Involving Endangered Species. Ecological Economics, 32, 93-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00069-5
  26. Lam, L. W. (2012). Impact of competitiveness on salespeople's commitment and performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1328-1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.026
  27. Le, T. D. T. (2018). The relationship between the intentions and the use of biodegradable bags. Master's thesis. Ho Chi Minh City Open University
  28. Lee, C. J., & Lim, S. Y (2020). Impact of Environmental Concern on Image of Internal GSCM Practices and Consumer Purchasing Behavior. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(6), 241-254. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.241
  29. Luong, T. B. V. (2013). Assessment of the impact of the environmental protection tax policy on the use of plastic bags in Hanoi. Master Thesis. VNU University of Science.
  30. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (2019). Joint action against plastic waste for a green Vietnam. Retrieved November 24, 2020 from http://www.monre.gov.vn/Pages/chung-tay-hanh-dong-chong-rac-thai-nhua-vi-mot-viet-namxanh.aspx
  31. Mostafa, M. M. (2009). Shades of green: A psychographic segmentation of the green consumer in Kuwait using self-organizing maps. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8), 11030-11038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.02.088
  32. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). The Assessment of Reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248-292.
  33. Nguyen, D. (2018). Why Vietnamese prefer using plastic bags. Retrieved November 24, 2020 from https://tuoitrenews.vn/news/society/20180803/why-vietnamese-prefer-using-plasticbags/46871.html
  34. Nguyen, T. K. C., Nguyen, D. M., Trinh, V. T, Tran, T. P. D., & Cao, T. P. (2020). Factors Affecting Intention to Purchase Green Products in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(4), 205-211. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no4.205
  35. Paul, J., Modi, A., & Patel, J. (2016). Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 29(C), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.006
  36. Pham, H. C. (2020). Antecedents of Organic Food Products Intention and Behaviors: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(11), 429-437. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.429
  37. Smithers, R. (2020). England's Plastic Bag Usage Drops 85% since 5p Charge Introduced. Retrieved November 30, 2020 from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jul/30/use-ofplastic-bags-in-england-drops-by-59-in-a-year.
  38. Smith, S., & Paladino, A. (2010). Eating clean and green? Investigating consumer motivations towards the purchase of organic food. Australasian Marketing Journal, 18(2), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2010.01.001.
  39. Tuoi Tre Reporters. (2019). Plastic bag reductions: Tax does not work!. Retrieved December 1, 2020 from https://tuoitre.vn/han-che-tui-nilong-danh-thue-cung-nhukhong-2019092308472249.htm
  40. Vu, A. D., Nguyen, T. H., & Nguyen, N. A. (2012). Test the model of factors affecting green consumption behavior. Vietnam Economic Review, 7(195), 30-52.
  41. Welsch, H., & Kuhling, J. (2009). Determinants of proenvironmental consumption: The role of reference groups and routine behavior. Ecological Economics, 69(1), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.009
  42. Welsh Government (2016). Post-Implementation Review of the Single Use Carrier Bag Charge in Wales. Retrieved January 2, 2021 from https://gov.wales/sites/default/files/statistics-andresearch/2019-07/160314-post-implementation-review-singleuse-carrier-bag-charge-en.pdf.
  43. Young W., Hwang K., Donald S. M., and Otaes C. J. (2010). Sustainable Consumption: Green Consumer Behaviour when Purchasing Product. Sustainable Development, 18, 20-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.394
  44. Zhao, H., Gao, Q., Wu, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhu, X. (2014). What affects green consumer behavior in China? A case study from Qingdao. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.021