Geomechanics and Engineering

  • 제27권5호
  • /
  • Pages.447-463
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2005-307X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-6219(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic behavior of caisson-type gravity quay wall renovated by rubble mound grouting and deepening

  • Kim, Young-Sang (Department of Civil Engineering, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Nguyen, Anh-Dan (Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Graduate school, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kang, Gyeong-O (Department of Civil Engineering, Gwangju University)
  • 투고 : 2021.06.12
  • 심사 : 2021.10.08
  • 발행 : 2021.12.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Caisson-type structures are widely used as quay walls in coastal areas. In Korea, for a long time, many caisson-type quay walls have been constructed with a low front water depth. These facilities can no longer meet the requirements of current development. This study developed a new technology for deepening existing caisson-type quay walls using grouting and rubble mound excavation to economically reuse them. With this technology, quay walls could be renovated by injecting grout into the rubble mound beneath the front toe of the caisson to secure its structure. Subsequently, a portion of the rubble mound was excavated to increase the front water depth. This paper reports the results of an investigation of the seismic behavior of a renovated quay wall in comparison to that of an existing quay wall using centrifuge tests and numerical simulations. Two centrifuge model tests at a scale of 1/120 were conducted on the quay walls before and after renovation. During the experiments, the displacements, accelerations, and earth pressures were measured under five consecutive earthquake input motions with increasing magnitudes. In addition, systematic numerical analyses of the centrifuge model tests were also conducted with the PLAXIS 2D finite element (FE) program using a nonlinear elastoplastic constitutive model. The displacements of the caisson, response accelerations, deformed shape of the quay wall, and earth pressures were investigated in detail based on a comparison of the numerical and experimental results. The results demonstrated that the motion of the caisson changed after renovation, and its displacement decreased significantly. The comparison between the FE models and centrifuge test results showed good agreement. This indicated that renovation was technically feasible, and it could be considered to study further by testbed before applying in practice.

키워드

과제정보

This research was a part of the project titled 'Development of Design Technology for Safe Harbor from Disasters' (No. 20180323), funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea.

참고문헌

  1. Al-Homoud, A.S. and Whitman, R.V. (1995), "Comparison between fe prediction and results from dynamic centrifuge tests on tilting gravity walls", Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng., 14(4), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-7261(94)00051-H.
  2. Alyami, M., Rouainia, M. and Wilkinson, S.M. (2009), "Numerical analysis of deformation behaviour of quay walls under earthquake loading", Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng., 29, 525-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.06.004.
  3. Arablouei, A., Gharabaghi, A.R.M., Ghalandarzadeh, A., Abedi, K. and Ishibashi, I. (2011), "Effects of seawater-structure-soil interaction on seismic performance of caisson-type quay wall", Computers and Structures, 89, 2439-2459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.06.005.
  4. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, A., Vlachakis, V.S. and Athanasopoulos, G.A. (2013), "Phasing issues in the seismic response of yielding, gravity-type earth retaining walls - Overview and results from a FEM study", Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng., 55, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.08.004.
  5. Bauduin, C., Mengeot, P. and Ganne, P. (2017). "Design and construction issues for deepening and strengthening of existing quay walls", Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Seoul, Korea.
  6. Benz, T. (2007), "Small-strain stiffness of soils and its numerical consequences", Ph.D. Dissertation, Universitat Sttutgart, Gemany.
  7. Brinkgreve, R.B.J., Engin, E. and Engin, H.K. (2010). "Validation of Empirical Formulas to Derive Model Parameters for Sands." Proceedings of the 7th European Conference Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering (NUMGE), Trondheim, Norway.
  8. Cho, H.I., Kim, H.S., Sun, C.G. and Kim, D.S. (2020), "Settlement prediction for footings based on stress history from Vs measurements", Geomech. Eng., 20(5) 371-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.20.5.371.
  9. Cho, H.I., Sun, C.G., Kim, J.H. and Kim, D.S. (2018), "OCR evaluation of cohesionless soil in centrifuge model using shear wave velocity", Geomech. Eng., 15(4), 987-995. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/gae.2018.15.4.987.
  10. Chopra, A.K. (2001), Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 2nd Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Englewood, New Jersey, USA.
  11. Cihan, H.K., Ergin, A., Cihan, K. and Guler, I. (2015), "Dynamic responses of two blocks under dynamic loading using experimental and numerical studies", Appl. Ocean Res., 49, 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2014.11.003.
  12. Dakoulas, P. and Gazetas, G. (2008), "Insight into seismic earth and water pressures against caisson quay walls" Geotechnique, 58(2) 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2008.58.2.95.
  13. Dakoulas, P., Vazouras, P., Kallioglou, P. and Gazetas, G. (2018), "Effective-stress seismic analysis of a gravity multi-block quay wall", Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng., 115, 378-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.08.032.
  14. Galal, E.M. (2017), "A numerical study for upgrading the container terminal of port-said west port", Port-Said Eng. Res. J., 21(2), 88-97. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/pserj.2017.33296.
  15. Galavi, V., Petalas, A. and Brinkgreve, R.B.J. (2013), "finite element modelling of seismic liquefaction in soils", Geotech. Eng., 44(3), 55-64.
  16. Gerolymos, N., Tasiopoulou, P. and Gazetas, G. (2015), "Seismic performance of block-type gravity quay-wall: numerical modeling versus centrifuge experiment" Proceedings of the SECED 2015 conference on Earthquake Risk and Engineering towards a Resilient World, Cambridge, UK.
  17. Ha, I.S. and Han, J.T. (2016), "Evaluation of the allowable axial bearing capacity of a single pile subjected to machine vibration by numerical analysis", J. Geo-Eng., 22(7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-016-0036-5.
  18. Ha, J.G., Lee, S.H., Kim, D.S. and Choo, Y.W. (2014), "Simulation of soil-foundation-structure interaction of Hualien large-scale seismic test using dynamic centrifuge test", Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng., 61-62, 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.01.008.
  19. Iai, S., Tobita, T. and Nakahara, T. (2005), "Generalised scaling relations for dynamic centrifuge tests", Geotechnique, 55(5), 355-362. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2005.55.5.355.
  20. Inagaki, H., Iai, S., Sugano, T., Yamazaki, H. and Inatomi, T. (1996), "Performance of caisson type quay walls at Kobe Port", Soils Foundations, 119-136. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.special_119.
  21. Khan, M.R.A., Hayano, K. and Kitazume, M. (2009), "Behavior of sheet pile quay wall stabilized by sea-side ground improvement in dynamic centrifuge tests", Soils Foundations, 49(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.49.193.
  22. Kim, D.S., Kim, N.R., Choo, Y.W. and Cho, G.C. (2013), "A newly developed state-of-the-art geotechnical centrifuge in Korea", KSCE J. Civil Eng., 17(1), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-1350-5.
  23. Kuhlemeyer, R.L. and Lysmer, J. (1973), "Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems", Soil Dynam. Division, 99(SM5), 421-427. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001885.
  24. Lee, C.J. (2005), "Centrifuge modeling of the behavior of caisson-type quay walls during earthquakes", Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng., 25(2), 117-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.10.011.
  25. Ministry of Ocean and Fisheries (2018), Harbor and Fishing Port Design Standard, Ministry of Ocean and Fisheries; Sejong, Republic of Korea.
  26. Mizutani, T. and Kikuchi, Y. (2013), "Shaking table tests on caisson-type quay wall with stabilized mound", Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering: Challenges and Innovations in Geotechnics, ICSMGE 2013, Paris, August.
  27. Nakamura, S. (2006), "Reexamination of Mononobe-Okabe theory of gravity retaining walls using centrifuge model tests", Soils Foundations, 46(2), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.46.135.
  28. Ngo, V.L., Kim, J.M. and Lee, C. (2019), "Influence of structure-soil-structure interaction on foundation behavior for two adjacent structures: Geo-centrifuge experiment", Geomech. Eng., 19(5), 407-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eri.2019.19.5.407.
  29. Nguyen, A.D., Kim, Y.S., Kang, G.O. and Kim, H.J. (2021), "Numerical analysis of static behavior of caisson-type quay wall deepened by grouting rubble-mound", J. Geo-Eng., 12(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-020-00130-3.
  30. Obrzud, R.F. and Truty, A. (2018), The Hardening Soil Model - A Practical Guidebook, Zace Services Ltd., Preverenges, Switzerland.
  31. Oung, O. and Brassinga, H. (2015), "Uncertainties in Redesigning an Existing Quay Wall." Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Geotechnical Safety and Risk, Rotterdam, October.
  32. Pitilakis, K., Kirtas, E., Sextos, A., Bolton, M., Madabhushi, G. and Brennan, A. (2004), "Validation by Centrifuge Testing of Numerical Simulations for Soil-Foundation-Structure Systems." Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, August.
  33. PLAXIS (2018), Material Models Manual, Bentley Systems, PA, USA.
  34. Rahaman, O. and Raychowdhury, P. (2017), "Seismic active earth pressure on bilinear retaining walls using a modified pseudo-dynamic method", J. Geo-Eng., 8(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-017-0040-4.
  35. Ruggeri, P., Fruzzetti, V.M.E. and Scarpelli, G. (2019), "Renovation of Quay Walls to Meet More Demanding Requirements: Italian Experiences", Coastal Eng., 147, 25-33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2019.01.003.
  36. Schanz, T., Vermeer, P. and Bonier, P. (1999). "Formulation and verification of the hardening soil model", Beyond 2000 in Computational Geotechnics, Routledge, London, United Kingdom.
  37. Zeng, X. and Schofield, A.N. (1996), "Design and performance of an equivalent-shear-beam container for earthquake centrifuge modelling", Geotechnique, 46(1), 83-102. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1996.46.1.83.