Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX (지적과 국토정보)

LX Spatial Information Research Institute (한국국토정보공사 공간정보연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Improving the Data Quality Validation of Underground Facilities(Structure-type)

지하시설물(구조물형) 데이터 품질검증방법 개선방안 연구

  • 배상근 (한국국토정보공사 공간정보연구원) ;
  • 김상민 (한국국토정보공사 공간정보연구원) ;
  • 유은진 (한국국토정보공사 공간정보연구원) ;
  • 임거배 (한국국토정보공사 공간정보연구원)
  • Received : 2021.10.01
  • Accepted : 2021.11.25
  • Published : 2021.12.10
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

With the available national spatial information that started from the sinkholes that occurred nationwide in 2014 and integrated 15 areas of underground information, the Underground Spatial Integrated Map has been continuously maintained since 2015. However, until recently, as disasters and accidents in underground spaces such as hot water pipes rupture, cable tunnel fires, and ground subsidence continue to occur, there is an increasing demand for quality improvement of underground information. Thus, this paper attempted to prepare a plan to improve the quality of the Underground Spatial Integrated Map data. In particular, among the 15 types of underground information managed through the Underground Spatial Integrated Map, quality validation improvement measures were proposed for underground facility (structure-type) data, which has the highest proportion of new constructions. To improve the current inspection methods that primarily rely on visual inspection, we elaborate on and subdivide the current quality inspection standards. Specifically, we present an approach for software-based automated inspection of databases, including graphics and attribute information, by adding three quality inspection items, namely, quality inspection methods, rules, and flow diagram, solvable error types, to the current four quality inspection items consisting of quality elements, sub-elements, detailed sub-elements, and quality inspection standards.

지하공간통합지도는 2014년도에 전국적으로 발생했던 싱크홀을 계기로 15종의 지하정보를 통합한 국가공간정보로서, 2015년부터 지속적으로 구축되고 있다. 그러나 최근까지도 온수관 파열, 통신구 화재, 지반 침하 등과 같은 지하공간에서의 재난·재해가 지속적으로 발생함에 따라 지하정보의 품질 향상에 대한 요구가 증대되고 있는 실정이다. 이에 본 논문에서는 지하공간통합지도 데이터의 품질 향상을 위한 방안을 마련하고자 하였다. 특히 지하공간통합지도를 통해 관리되는 15종의 지하정보 중 신규 구축 비중이 가장 높은 지하시설물(구조물형) 데이터의 품질검증 개선 방안을 제시하였다. 대부분 육안검수로 진행되고 있는 현재의 검수 방식을 개선하기 위해 품질검사 기준을 좀 더 구체화·세분화하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 현재 품질요소, 세부요소, 세세부요소, 품질검사 기준으로 구성된 검사항목에 품질검사 방법, 품질검사 규칙, Flow Diagram, 해결 가능 오류 유형 항목을 추가하여 속성정보 뿐 아니라 도형정보까지 소프트웨어로 자동검수하기 위한 알고리즘을 개발하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 국토교통부/국토교통과학기술진흥원의 지원으로 수행되었음(과제번호 20DCRU-B158151-01).

References

  1. Kim BS, Lee HS, Hong SK. 2020. Design and Implementation of the Prototype Wywtem to Validate 3-Dimensional Geospatial Data. Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information Science. 28(3): 39-49.
  2. Bae SK, Kim SM, Lee YJ. 2020a. Construction of Underground Space Registration Information Using Public Data. Journal of the Korean Society of Cadastre. 36(2):23-37. https://doi.org/10.22988/KSC.2020.36.2.002
  3. Bae SK, Kim SM, Yoo. EJ. 2020b. Analysis on Spatial Data Quality Standards. Korean Society of Civil Engineers 2020 Convention Conference & Civil Expo.
  4. Bae SK, Kim SM, Yoo EJ. 2020c. Research on Improving Quality Management for Underground Space Integration Map. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 50(2): 221-235. https://doi.org/10.22640/LXSIRI.2020.50.2.221
  5. Lee IS, Ko JS. 2008. 3D Cadastral Mapping for Complex Underground Construction -Based on Underground Store, Underground Sidewalk Surveying-. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 38(2):233-250.
  6. Choi JY, Kim EH. 2020. A Quality Management Model for Consumer-oriented Spatial Information. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 50(1):47-62. https://doi.org/10.22640/LXSIRI.2020.50.1.47
  7. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. 2018. Regulations on Underground Space Integrated Map Production. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Notice No.2018-661.
  8. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. 2020. Special Act on Underground Safety Management. Act No.14545.
  9. Cai L, Zhu Y. 2015. The Challenges of Data Quality and Data Quality Assessment in the Big Data Era. Data Science Journal, Software and Standards. 14:(2):1-10.
  10. ISO/TC 211. 2013. ISO 19157:2013 Geographic information - Data quality. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/32575.html.
  11. ISO/TC 211. 2019. ISO 19107:2019 Geographic information - Spatial schema. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/26012.html.
  12. Larry P. English. 1999. Improving data warehouse and business information quality : methods for reducing costs and increasing profits. John Wiley & Sons, p.544.
  13. Ledoux H. 2018. val3dity: validation of 3D GIS primitives according to the international standards. Open Geospatial Data, Software and Standards. 3(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40965-018-0043-x
  14. OGC. 2016. CityGML Quality Interoperability Experiment. OGC. Public Engineering Report.