대한건축학회논문집 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea)

  • 제37권11호
  • /
  • Pages.317-326
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2733-6239(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-6247(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

IPA를 활용한 한국과 중국의 BIM 활용성과 비교분석

Comparative Analysis of BIM Performance between Korea and China using IPA

  • 이슬기 (광운대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 송경욱 (광운대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 유정호 (광운대학교 건축공학과)
  • 투고 : 2021.08.19
  • 심사 : 2021.11.11
  • 발행 : 2021.11.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Both Korea and China have designated BIM application compulsory targets to revitalize BIM in the construction industry and established a BIM revitalization promotion plan. In order to obtain the expected effect of using BIM, it is necessary not only to purchase tools for BIM use and to prepare related systems and organizations, but also to identify and reflect user requirements through periodic performance evaluation from the user's point of view. Therefore, this study examines the strategies established for BIM activation in Korea and China, evaluates each country's BIM utilization performance, checks the investment direction for each country's BIM activation, and derives key improvement factors and improvement plans. The importance and performance of the expected effects of BIM are measured on a 7-point scale for construction industry practitioners in Korea and China who have experience in using BIM. We verify whether there is a significant difference in the importance and performance using t-test and derive priority improvement priorities for each country using IPA. According to the results of the analysis, in Korea, the effects of high importance were also high in performance. This is judged to be the result of relatively long-term investment based on a specific implementation plan for revitalizing BIM. On the other hand, unlike Korea, China does not show a specific trend, and 'Maintain relations with the client' has the highest performance in both the design and construction stages. It is judged that China is greatly influenced by external factors in the use of BIM. Through this, it is meaningful not only to identify improvement plans for each country, but also to suggest the necessity of establishing a specific implementation plan while presenting the characteristics of BIM utilization by adoption time.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 국토교통부 도시건축 연구개발사업의 연구비 지원(21AUDP-B127891-05)에 의해 수행되었음.

참고문헌

  1. Arayici, Y., Coates, P., Koskela, L., Kagioglou, M., Usher, C., & O'reilly, K. (2011). Technology Adoption in the BIM implementation for lean architectural practice, Automation in Construction, 20(2), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.016
  2. Chen, Y., Yin, Y., Browne, J., & Li, D. (2019). Adoption of building information modeling in Chinese construction industry: The technology-organization-environment framework, Management Studies, 26(9), 1878-1898
  3. Chen, K., Lu, W. Peng, Y., Rowlinson, S., & Huang, G. Q.(2015). Bridging BIM and Building L Form a literature review to an integrated conceptual Framework, International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1405-1416 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.03.006
  4. Giel, B.K., & Issa, R.R. (2011). Return on investment anlyaia of using building information modeling in construction, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 27(5), 511-521. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000164
  5. Hwang, J.O., Hong, Y.K., Kim, Y.I., & Park, S.H. (2010). Research and Future of Sensor Network based BIM, Communications of the Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers, 28(7), 36-43
  6. Kim, W.J., Song, T.S., & Lee, G. (2017). Diffusion Strategies of Major Countries through an Comparative Analysis of Their BIM Roadmaps, Proceedings of Architecture Institute of Korea, 37(2), 873-876.
  7. Kim, T.W., Lee, J.H., Lee, Y.S., Kim, J.J., & Lee, T.S. (2017). A study on Analysis of Convergence Trends in Global BIM Market Using Patent Information, Korea, Journal of Construction Engineering Management, 18(3), 95-104.
  8. Lee, S.K. (2014), BIM Acceptance Readiness Evaluation Model considering Organizational Culture, Ph.D. Dissertation, Kwangwoon University
  9. Liu, H., Al-Hussein, M., & Liu, M.(2015). BIM-based integrated approach for detailed construction scheduling under resource constraints, Automation in Construction, 53, 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.008
  10. Matilla, J.A., & James, J.C. (1977). Importance-Performance analysis, Journal of Marketing, 41(3), 77-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112
  11. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2020). 2030 BIM Activation Roadmap
  12. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., & Berry, L.L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multi-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality, Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 13-30.
  13. Public Procurement Service (2010). Roadmap for expanding 3D building technique (BIM) application
  14. SmartMarket Report (2007). Interoperability in the Construction Industry
  15. SmartMarket Report (2017). The Business Value of BIM for Infrastructure 2017
  16. Song, S., Yang, J., & Kim, N. (2012). Developement of a BIM-based Structural framework optimization and simulation system for building construction, Computers in Industry, 63(9), 895-912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2012.08.013
  17. Weisheng, L., Chi, C. L., & Tung, T. (2019). BIM and Big Data for Construction Cost Management, Routledge, 43.
  18. Zhang, H.Y. (2021). Exploration of digital transformation path of construction enterprises, Construction enterprise management, 06, 54-57.
  19. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (2011). 2011~2015 Construction Industry Information Development Outline
  20. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (2016). 2016~2020 Construction Industry Information Development Outline