ETRI Journal

Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (한국전자통신연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploiting cognitive wireless nodes for priority-based data communication in terrestrial sensor networks

  • Received : 2019.06.10
  • Accepted : 2019.09.26
  • Published : 2020.02.07
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A priority-based data communication approach, developed by employing cognitive radio capacity for sensor nodes in a wireless terrestrial sensor network (TSN), has been proposed. Data sensed by a sensor node-an unlicensed user-were prioritized, taking sensed data importance into account. For data of equal priority, a first come first serve algorithm was used. Non-preemptive priority scheduling was adopted, in order not to interrupt any ongoing transmissions. Licensed users used a nonpersistent, slotted, carrier sense multiple access (CSMA) technique, while unlicensed sensor nodes used a nonpersistent CSMA technique for lossless data transmission, in an energy-restricted, TSN environment. Depending on the analytical model, the proposed wireless TSN environment was simulated using Riverbed software, and to analyze sensor network performance, delay, energy, and throughput parameters were examined. Evaluating the proposed approach showed that the average delay for sensed, high priority data was significantly reduced, indicating that maximum throughput had been achieved using wireless sensor nodes with cognitive radio capacity.

Keywords

References

  1. M. Dahiya, Need and advantages of 5G wireless communication systems, Int. J. Adv. Res. Comp. Sci. Man. Studies 5 (2017), 48-51.
  2. T. X. Brown and D. C. Sicker. Can cognitive radio support broadband wireless access? in Proc. 2007 2nd IEEE Int. Symp. New Front. Dynamic Spectrum Access Net., Dublin, NI, 2007, pp. 123-132.
  3. M. Bekhti et al. Path planning of unmanned aerial vehicles with terrestrial wireless network tracking, in Proc. Wireless Days (WD), Toulouse, France, 2016, pp. 1-6.
  4. M. Shaat and A. I. Perez-Neira. Joint flow control and link scheduling in hybrid terrestrial-satellite wireless backhauling network, in Proc. Commun. Workshops (ICC Workshops), Paris, France, 2017, pp. 870-875.
  5. J. Baranda et al. Evaluation of hybrid terrestrial-satellite suburban wireless mesh backhauls for LTE networks, in Proc. Eur. Conf. Netw. and Commun. (EuCNC), Oulu, Finland, 2017, pp. 1-6.
  6. Z. Lin et al., Beamforming for secure wireless information and power transfer in terrestrial networks coexisting with satellite networks, IEEE Signal Proc. Lett. 25 (2018), no. 8, 1166-1170. https://doi.org/10.1109/LSP.2018.2842645
  7. A. Ahmad et al., An Advanced Energy Consumption Model for terrestrial Wireless Sensor Networks, in Proc. Int. Wireless Commun. Mobile Comput. Conf. (IWCMC), Paphos, Cyprus, 2016, pp. 790-793.
  8. M. Ghaleb et al., A performance simulation tool for the analysis of data gathering in both terrestrial and underwater sensor networks, IEEE Access 5 (2017), 4190-4208. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2684539
  9. D. Garcia-Lesta et al., Wireless sensor network with perpetual motes for terrestrial snail activity monitoring, IEEE Sens. J 15 (2017), no. 15, 5008-5015. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2017.2718107
  10. G. A. Shah and O. B. Akan, CSMA-based bandwidth estimation for cognitive radio sensor networks, in Proc. Int. Conf. New Technologies, Mobility Security (NTMS), Istanbul, Turkey, 2012, pp. 1-5.
  11. A. Mesodiakaki et al., Energy-efficient contention-aware channel selection in Cognitive Radio Ad-Hoc Networks, in Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop Comp. Aided Modeling Des. Comm. Links Net. (CAMAD), Barcelona, Spain, 2012, pp. 46-50.
  12. S. Hu, Y. Yao, and Z. Yang, MAC protocol identification approach for implement smart cognitive radio, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC), Ottawa, Canada, 2012, pp. 5608-5612.
  13. Y. Zhao et al., Analytical interference model in CSMA-based cognitive radio networks, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Electro-Information Tech. (EIT) 2013, Rapid City, SD, 2013, pp. 1-6.
  14. A. Mesodiakaki et al., Energy efficiency analysis of secondary networks in cognitive radio systems, in Proc. IEEE Inter. Conf. Commun. (ICC), Budapest, Hungary, 2013, pp. 4115-4119.
  15. A. Mesodiakaki et al., Fairness evaluation of a secondary network coexistence scheme, in Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop Comp. Aided Model. Des. Comm. Links and Nets (CAMAD), Berlin, Germany, 2013, pp. 180-184.
  16. S. Bhattacharjee, S. Mandal, and B. Sardar, Performance analysis of CSMA/CA protocol during white space identification in cognitive radio networks, in Proc. Appl. Inn. Mob. Computing (AIMoC), Kolkata, India, 2014, pp. 91-96.
  17. A. Saad, B. Staehle, and Y. Chen, On the effectiveness of medium access with predictive collision avoidance, in Proc. IEEE Emerg. Tech. Factory Automat. (ETFA), Barcelona, Spain, 2014, pp. 1-4.
  18. S. Zhuo et al., Adaptive congestion control in cognitive industrial wireless sensor networks, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Indust. Inform. (INDIN), Cambridge, UK, 2015, pp. 900-907.
  19. R. Morcel et al., Proactive channel allocation for multimedia applications over CSMA/CA-based CRNs, in Proc. Int. Conf. Adv. Computational Tools Eng. Appl. (ACTEA), Beirut, Lebanon, 2016, 178-183.
  20. N. Rastegardoost and B. Jabbari, Blind channel selection strategies for distributed cognitive MAC, in Proc. IEEE Ann. Int. Symp. Personal, Indoor, Mobile Radio Commun. (PIMRC), Valencia, Spain, 2016, pp. 1-6.
  21. A. Saad, B. Staehle, and R. Knorr, Predictive medium access control for industrial cognitive radio, in Proc. IEEE Ann. Cons. Commun. Netw. Conf. (CCNC), Las Vegas, NV, 2018, pp. 1-8.
  22. Q. Chen et al., MAC protocol design and performance analysis for random access cognitive radio networks, Proc. IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun. 31 (2013), no. 11, 2289-2300. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2013.131121
  23. Y. Liu, N. Kundargi, and A. Tewfik, Channel idle time statistics based spectrum accessing strategies with CSMA based primary networks, Proc. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc. 62 (2014), no. 3, 572-582. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2013.2291216
  24. A. Mesodiakaki et al., Performance analysis of a cognitive radio contention-aware channel selection algorithm, IEEE Trans. Vehicular Tech. 64 (2015), no. 5, 1958-1972. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2014.2341115
  25. A. Cammarano et al., Throughput-optimal cross-layer design for cognitive radio ad hoc networks, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 26 (2015), no. 9, 2599-2609. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2014.2350495
  26. Y. Kawamoto et al., Effectively collecting data for the location-based authentication in internet of things, IEEE Syst. J. 11 (2011), no. 3, 1403-1411. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2015.2456878
  27. F. Chiti, R. Fantacci, and A. Tani, Performance evaluation of an adaptive channel allocation technique for cognitive wireless sensor networks, IEEE Trans. Vehicular Tech. 66 (2017), no. 6, 5351-5363. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2016.2621140
  28. C. Majumdar et al., Packet-size optimization for multiple-input multiple-output cognitive radio sensor networks-aided internet of things, IEEE Access 5 (2017), 14419-14440. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2687083
  29. M. Raza et al., A critical analysis of research potential, challenges, and future directives in industrial wireless sensor networks, IEEE Commun. Surveys Tut. 20 (2018), no. 1, 39-95. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2759725
  30. D. Bein and B. B. Madan, Reducing the data communication delay in wireless sensor networks, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Intell. Comput. Comm. Process. (ICCP), Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2016, pp. 361-368.
  31. R. Shrestha, V. Swargam, and M. S. Murty, Cognitive-rad io wireless-sensor based on energy detection with improved accuracy: Performance and hardware perspectives, in Proc. Int. Symp. VLSI Design and Test (VDAT), Guwahati, India, 2016, pp. 1-6.
  32. A. A. Owayed, Z. A. Mohammed, and A. A. Mosa, Probabilities of detection and false alarm in multitaper based spectrum sensing for cognitive radio systems in AWGN, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. Syst., Singapore, 2010, pp. 579-584.
  33. Riverbed Software, https://www.river bed.com/gb/, 2019, [last accessed May 2019].
  34. Matlab Software, https://www.mathw orks.com/, 2019, [last accessed May 2019].
  35. F. Luo et al., Node energy consumption analysis in wireless sensor networks, in Proc. IEEE Vehicular Tech. Conf. (VTC2014-Fall), Vancouver, Canada, 2014, pp. 1-5.

Cited by

  1. Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimisation based Energy Efficient Dynamic Correlation Behavior of Secondary Nodes in Cognitive Radio Sensor Networks vol.14, pp.10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2019.0750
  2. SDN‐enabled Cognitive Radio Network Architecture vol.14, pp.18, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2019.1346
  3. Channel aware wireless body area network with cognitive radio technology in disaster cases vol.33, pp.16, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.4565
  4. BSCF: Learning background suppressed correlation filter tracker for wireless multimedia sensor networks vol.111, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2020.102340
  5. Cognitive radio based efficient video multicast in TV white space vol.15, pp.15, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1049/cmu2.12200
  6. Modeling and analysis of priority and RANGE‐BASED‐ deterministic and synchronous multichannel extension ‐ guaranteed time slot allocation in I vol.32, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.4323