Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning (농촌계획)

Korean Society of Rural Planning (한국농촌계획학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Economic Evaluation of ODA Project - A Case of Poultry Farm in Uganda -

우간다 양계부문 ODA 사업의 농가단위 경제성 평가

  • Yang, Heon-Yong (Department of Rural Construction Engineering, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Seo, Il-Hwan (Department of Rural Construction Engineering, Jeonbuk National University)
  • 양헌용 (전북대학교 지역건설공학과) ;
  • 서일환 (전북대학교 지역건설공학과)
  • Received : 2020.09.15
  • Accepted : 2020.11.26
  • Published : 2020.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As globalization, international cooperation has grown in importance. In accordance with this trend, Korea has been receiving high demands from international organizations about expanding the scale of Official Development Assistance(ODA) in line with its improved national status. In addition, in the economic aspect of Korea, the ODA project is expected to provide new growth opportunities in the mid- to long-term by promoting cooperation with developing countries. Uganda is an area with high strategic value due to good agricultural conditions and favorable geographical conditions. The poultry industry is a business that is generally carried out to the Ugandan, but due to economic problems such as initial investment cost, most of them have raised poultry on a small scale which is not enough for main income. This paper proposes the construction and operation plan of adapting to small poultry farms in the village-intensive type to sustainable income for residents in Uganda through ODA project in Korea's agricultural technology. The economic feasibility was analyzed from the long-term perspective when the initial construction cost was supported or not and the poultry species ratio was adjusted in terms of initial and operating costs. Economic analysis was performed using Net Present Value(NPV) method. As of after 10 years, when operating in the form of shifting kuroiler to layers, it was estimated to earn about 700,000 ugx more than when only kuroiler is raised, and it is able to reduce about 14 million ugx from the initial cost than when only raising layers. As of 20 years, the most profitables scenario was the breeding of 100 kuroilers and 400 layers methods. however, this case was anlayzed to be unsuitable for Uganda farmers, with initial costs more than three times higher than the shifting method of the kuroiler to layers. If the initial construction cost is supported by ODA project, the initial investment cost can be recovered in the first year with the shifting method, whereas raising only layers take two years to recoup the cost. In the meantime, when studying livestock industry in Uganda, it was examined by relying on statistical data, but this paper is meaningful in that it predicted how much it is economically effective based on field experience.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson J., Learch E., Gardner T., 2016, National Survey and Segmentation of Smallholder Households in Uganda understanding their demand for financial, agricultural and digital solutions, Consultative Group to Assist the Poor, World Bank/CGAP, Washington D.C., 38-40
  2. Byerlee D., Janvry A., Sadoulet E., 2009, Agriculture for Development : Toward a New Paradigm, Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1, 15-31 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.resource.050708.144239
  3. Choi J. E., 2015, Estimation of Social discount rate for economic analysis of public investment projects, Journal of Social Science, 41(3), 145-167 https://doi.org/10.15820/khjss.2015.41.3.007
  4. Chu U. S., 2019, ODA Modernization; The Background and Its Implications for South Korea, KIHASA, 10, 5-22
  5. Duguies M. V., Artero V., Barcinas J., 2016, Poultry Production Guide for a 500 Layer Operation, College of Natural & Applied Sciences, 3-22
  6. Export-Import Bank of Korea, 2007, F/S guidelines, Export-Import Bank of Korea, Seoul
  7. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2003, Egg marketing - a guide for the production and sale of eggs, FAO Agricultral services bulletin 150, Rome
  8. Food and Agriculutre Organization of the United Nations, 2018, Africa Sustainable Livestock 2050 Livestock and livelihoods spotlight Uganda cattle and poultry sectors, The Republic of Uganda, Rome, 1
  9. Galukande E., Alinaitwe J., Mudondo H., 2016, Improving livelihoods of the urban poor in kampala city Through Kuroiler chicken production, Proceedings of the Conference on International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development, Tropentag 2016, Vienna, Austria, 2-4
  10. Harrison M., 2010, Valuing the future : the social discount rate in cost-benefit analysis, Australian Government productivity commission, Melbourne, Australia, 1-175
  11. Henry S., 2009, Poultry genetic resources and small poultry production systems in Uganda, FAO, Rome, 1-22
  12. Kang M. S., 2015, Market Participation Decision Making of Small Scale Farmers in least developed countries; Case study of Uganda and Tanzania, Master's Thesis, Seoul National University.
  13. Kim T. H., 2016, ODA Effects in Middle Asian Countries and Strategic Revitalization of Economic Cooperation, The Korean Association of Trade and Industry Studies, 21(3), 81-103
  14. Kugonza D., Kyarisiima C. C., Iisa A., 2008, Indigenous chicken flocks of eastern Uganda : I. productivity, management and strategies for better performance, Livestock Research for Rural Development, 20(9)
  15. Kwak S. I., Jeon H. L., Kim M, H., 2012, Benefit-cost analysis of ODA projects, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, Seoul
  16. Kwon I., 2019, Poultry project of the Korea-Africa Food and Agriculture Cooperation Initiative, Korean Journal of Poultry Science, 51(2), 160-163
  17. Lee S. W., 2017, The budget research and policy preview of the KOICA National Cooeration Projects in the Middle period(2017-2020) Based on the second National Cooperation Strategy(CPS), Jouranl of International Development Cooperation, 12(4), 159-196
  18. Mungyereza B., 2018, Uganda National Household Survey 2016/2017 Report, Uganda Bureau of Statistics, 36-109
  19. OECD QWIDS., Paris, France, accessed Jun 4, 2020., https://stats.oecd.org/qwids/#?x=1&y=6&f=3:118,4:1,5:4,2:1,7:1&q=3:118,119,138,145,G8+4:1+5:4+2:1+7:1+1:61+6:2014,2015,2016,2017,2018,2019
  20. Official Development Assisatance Korea, 2020, Implementation plan for international development cooperation for 2020, ODA KOREA, Sejong-si, 1-208
  21. Official Development Assistance Korea, 2017, 2017 Korea's official development assistance in the hundredth volume, 11-1092000-000004-12, ODA KOREA, Sejongsi, 1-159
  22. Okot M. W., 1990, A cooperative approach to smallholer rural poultry production in Uganda in smallholder rural poultry production, CTA seminar proceedings, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2, 249-253
  23. Sharma J., Jagdev S., Jie Xie, Boggess M., Galukande E., Semambo D., Sharma S., 2015, Higher weight gain by Kuroiler chickens than indigenous chickens raised under scavenging conditions by rural households in Uganda, Livestock Research for Rural Development, 27(9), 1-3
  24. The Republic of Uganda, 2018, State of Uganda population report 2018, The Republic of Uganda, Kampala
  25. Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS), 2019, Statistics of Production about Agriculture & Fishing, Kampala, Uganda, accessed Jun 4, 2020., https://www.ubos.org/explore-statistics/2/
  26. United States Agency International Development, 2017, Scaling up of improved poultry breeds in Uganda, USAID, Washington D.C., 1-46
  27. Warusawitharana M., The social discount rate in developing countries, Board of Governors of the federal reserve system, accessed Nov 11, 2020., https://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/notes/feds-notes/2014/the-social-discount-rate-in-developing-countries-20141009.html
  28. Zhuang J., Zhihong L., Tun L., Franklin D., 2007, Theory and practice in the choic of social discount rate for cost-benefit analysis : A survey, Asian Development Bank, Economics and Research Department Working Paper series No. 94, 1-29