DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Structural Capacity Evaluation of System Scaffolding using X-Type Advanced Guardrail

교차가새형 선행 안전난간을 적용한 시스템비계의 구조 성능 평가

  • Park, J.D. (Department of Safety and Health, University of Ulsan) ;
  • Lee, H.S. (Office of General OSH Programs, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency) ;
  • Shin, W.S. (Construction System Board, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency) ;
  • Kwon, Y.J. (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency) ;
  • Park, S.E. (Civil Engineering Division, Korea Railroad Corporation) ;
  • Yang, S.S. (Department of Civil, Safety and Environmental Engineering, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Jung, K. (School of Industrial Engineering, University of Ulsan)
  • 박주동 (울산대학교 안전보건전문학과) ;
  • 이현섭 (안전보건공단 기술총괄본부 정책사업부) ;
  • 신우승 (안전보건공단 건설시스템단) ;
  • 권용준 (안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 박순응 (한국철도공사 기술본부 토목시설처) ;
  • 양승수 (한경대학교 토목안전환경공학과) ;
  • 정기효 (울산대학교 산업경영공학부)
  • Received : 2020.09.03
  • Accepted : 2020.10.21
  • Published : 2020.10.31

Abstract

In domestic construction sites, when installing steel pipe scaffolding and system scaffolding, the guardrails are installed after the installation of the work platforms. This conventional guardrail system (CGS) is always exposed to the risk of falls because the safety railing is installed later. In order to prevent fall disasters during erecting and dismantling scaffolds, it is necessary to introduce the advanced guardrail system (AGS) which installs railings in advance of climbing onto a work platform. For the introduction of the AGS, the structural performance of the system scaffolding applying the CGS and the AGS was compared and evaluated. The structural analysis of the system scaffold (height: 31 m and width: 27.4 m) with AGS confirmed that structural safety was ensured because the maximum stress of each element of the system scaffolding satisfies the allowable stress of each element. As a result of performance comparison of CGS and AGS for each element, the combined stress ratio of vertical posts in AGS was 6.4% lower than that of CGS. In addition, in the case of ledger and transom, the combined stress ratios of AGS and CGS were almost the same. The compression test of the assembled system scaffolding (three-storied, 1 bay) showed that the AGS had better performance than the CGS by 9.7% (8.91 kN). The cross bracing exceeds the limit on slenderness ratio of codes for structural steel design. But the safety factor for the compressive load of the cross bracing was evaluated as meeting the design criteria by securing 3 or more. In actual experiments, it was confirmed that brace buckling did not occur even though the overall scaffold was buckled. Therefore, in the case of temporary structures, it was proposed to revise the standards for limiting on slenderness ratio of secondary or auxiliary elements to recommendations. This study can be used as basic data for the introduction of AGS for installing guardrails in advance at domestic construction sites.

Keywords

References

  1. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA), Industrial Accident Statistics, 2016-2018.
  2. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA), KOSHA GUIDE(C-30-2018), "Technical Safety Guide for Installation and use of Steel Pipe Scaffolding", 2016.
  3. Ministry of Employment and Labor (MOEL), Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA), Busan Metropolitan Corporation(BMC), " Practice Guidelines on the Safe use of Scaffolding in Construction Site", pp. 7, 56-57, 2019.
  4. J. D. Park, M. S. Oh, H. S. Lee, J. S. Choon, Y. J. Kwon and K. Jung, "Feasibility Analysis for Introduction of Scaffolding with Advanced Guardrail System to Prevent Falls", J. Korean Soc. Saf., Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 23-31, 2020. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2020.35.4.23
  5. Japanese Standards Association, "Japanese Industrial Standard, JIS A 8961", 2014.
  6. T. Chandrangsu and K. J. R. Rasmussen, "Investigation of Geometric Imperfections and Joint Stiffness of Support Scaffold Systems", Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 576-584, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.12.004
  7. G. P. Cimellaro and M. Domaneschi, "Stability Analysis of Different Types of Steel Scaffolds", Engineering Structures, Vol. 152, pp. 535-548, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.091
  8. J. L. Peng, T. Yen, C. C. Kuo and S. L. Chan, "Analytical and Experimental Bearing Capacities of System Scaffolds", Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 82-92, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A0820010
  9. S. W. Lee, S. C. Jeong, S. J. Kim and J. H. Won, "Experimental Study on Ultimate Load of System Scaffolding According to Catwalk Width and Bracing Installation", Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 127-137, 2020. https://doi.org/10.7781/kjoss.2020.32.2.127
  10. S. W. Lee, N. K. Jang, J. H. Won and S. C. Jeong, "Effects of Number of bays and Bracing Member on the Ultimate Behavior of System Scaffolds", J. Korean Soc. Saf., Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 6-15, 2020. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2020.35.3.6
  11. S. C. Jeong, J. H. Kwon, J. H. Won and Y. J. Kwon, "Feasibility Analysis for the Introduction of Safety Certification System for Assembled Temporary Equipment and Materials", J. Korea Soc. Saf., Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 32-42, 2020. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2020.35.3.32
  12. Korea Construction Standard Center, "Design Standard of Scaffolding and Safety Facilities(KDS 21 60 00 : 2020)", pp. 1-9, 2020.
  13. G. Y. Kim, J. H. Won and S. H. Kim, "Structural Behavior Analysis of System Supports according to Boundary Condition of Joints between Vertical and Horizontal Members", J. Korean Soc. Saf., Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 60-65, 2017. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2017.32.3.60
  14. J. H. Won, H. D. Lee, M. K. Choi and M. C. Park, "Flexural Strength and Rotational Stiffness Estimation of Joint between Vertical and Horizontal Members in System Support", J. Korean Soc. Saf., Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 46-53, 2018. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2018.33.4.46
  15. Korean Society of Steel Construction, "Steel Structure Design", p. 324, 2011.
  16. American National Standards Institute(ANSI), "Standards for Testing and Rating Scaffold Assemblies and Components", 2002.
  17. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA), Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute (OSHRI), "A Study on the Safety Certification Criteria of Fabricated Temporary Equipment and Materials", pp. 356-357, 2019.
  18. Ministry of Employment and Labor(MOEL), "MOEL Notice No. 2020-33, Safety Certification Notice for Protection Systems", 2020.
  19. Korea Construction Standard Center, "Design Standard of Steel Structural Members(Allowable stress design, KDS 14 30 10)", p. 5, 2019.
  20. Korea Construction Standard Center, "Design Standard of Steel Structural Members(LRFD, KDS 14 31 10)", p. 11, 2019.
  21. Architectural Institude of Korea, "Korea Building code and Commentary", p. 735, 2016.