DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Development of Old Down-town Activation Indicator -Focusing on Improving Urban Resilience in the Old Down-town of Seo-gu, Incheon-

원도심 활성화지표 개발에 관한 연구 -인천광역시 서구 원도심의 지역 회복력 향상을 중심으로-

  • Chang, Dong-Min (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Chungwoon University)
  • 장동민 (청운대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2020.07.17
  • Accepted : 2020.11.06
  • Published : 2020.11.30

Abstract

This study was done to develop indicators for cities that can be used in the long term and in a sustainable manner. Activation indicators were developed to improve the resilience in the downtown area of Seo-gu, Incheon. Preliminary indicators were derived from prior studies on similar indicators of resilience for urban regeneration, and an expert opinion survey was conducted to analyze the suitability and importance of the indicators. Activation indicators were established for improving urban resilience in six areas: population stability, social inclusion, industrial diversity, local productivity, environmental sustainability, and social-based convenience. From 60 preliminary indicators, 42 indicators were selected through the expert opinion surveys for securing an economically active population, establishing a living infrastructure, improving the settlement environment, and upgrading industry to reflect the characteristics of the West, including industrial complexes. It was found that diversification is necessary. Further study is still necessary to improve the objectivity of the indicators and calculate a resilience index. The significance of this study is that it looks at quantitative indicators, complements other studies on regional decline diagnosis, and presents realistic alternatives suitable for domestic situations based on the concept of resilience.

본 연구는 도시를 종합적으로 이해하고 진단하여 장기적이고 지속가능하게 운영 및 관리할 수 있는 지표를 개발하는 것이다. 인천시 서구 원도심지역의 회복력향상을 위한 활성화 지표개발을 위해 도시재생의 범주에서 활용중인 회복력 유사지표에 관한 선행연구를 통해 예비지표를 도출하고, 전문가의견조사를 통해 지표의 적합성과 중요도 분석을 실행하였다. 도시회복력 향상을 위한 활성화지표는 인구의 안정성, 사회적 포용성, 산업의 다양성, 지역의 생산성, 환경적 지속성, 사회기반의 편의성 등 총 6개 구성영역으로 정립하였다. 도출된 60개의 예비지표를 기준으로 전문가 의견조사를 통해 선정된 지표는 42개로 경제활동가능 인구의 확보, 생활형인프라 구축과 정주환경개선, 그리고 산업단지가 포함된 서구의 특성을 반영한 산업의 고도화 및 다양화가 필요한 것으로 파악되었다. 이후 지표의 객관성을 보완하고 회복력 지수 산출을 위한 추가적인 연구가 진행되어야할 필요가 있다. 정량적 지표 위주로 구성되어 지역의 쇠퇴진단에 주목하는 기존연구를 보완하며, 회복력의 개념을 토대로 국내 실정에 맞는 현실적 대안을 제시한 점은 본 연구가 가지는 의의이다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. W. Choi, A. R. Cho, S. H. Lee, Development of Urban regeneration Indicators in Suwon, Technical Report, Suwon Sustainable City Foundation, Korea, pp.1-2.
  2. J. G. Kim, J. H. Lim, S. H. Lee, A research on Urban Resilience for Urban Regeneration, Technical Report, Land & Housing Institute, Korea, pp.27-33.
  3. Jo Da Silva, B. E. Morera, City Resilience Framework, The Rockefeller Foundation & ARUP, United Kingdom, pp.5-9.
  4. E. L. Moreno, R. O. Murgula, The Cty Prosperity Initiative, Technical Report, UN-Habitat, Kenya, pp.3-4.
  5. S. J. Ha, K. C. Nam, S. H. Lee, S. J. Jeon, J. S. Park, A Study on the Examination and Application of the Regional Resilience for Sustainable Development, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, Korea, pp.77-85.
  6. Y. M. Jeon, A Comparative Analysis of the Level of Urban Resilience in the Comprehensive Plan, Master's thesis, The Graduate School of Engineering Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea, pp.33-54, 2016.
  7. D. G. Han, A resilience approach to constructing analysis system of regional resilience, Master's thesis, Department of Urban Planning of The Graduate School Hongik University, Seoul, Korea, pp.70-73, 2017.
  8. S. M. Han, M. H. Lee, "Analysis of Evaluation Indicator for the Development and Management of Sustainable and Resilient City", Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association, Vol.29, No.3, pp.1-24, Sep. 2017. https://www.earticle.net/Article/A310317 https://doi.org/10.22885/KRDA.2017.29.3.1
  9. M. R. Byun, Framework of the Inclusive City Indicators and the Inclusiveness of Seoul, Technical Report, The Seoul Institute, Korea, pp.54-67.
  10. K. J. Kim, Development of indicators for urban decline and potential, Technical Report, Korea Urban Renaissance Center, Seoul, pp.40-41.
  11. D. S. Yang, Development of urban decline diagnosis indicators and potential indicators to build a comprehensive information system, Technical Report, Korea Urban Renaissance Center, Seoul, pp.5-6.
  12. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Guidelines for Urban Sustainability and Living Infrastructure Assessment, Korea, pp.6-7.
  13. Y. H. Ki, 2025 Incheon Urban Regeneration Strategy Plan, Technical Report, Incheon Development Institute, Incheon, pp.81-83.
  14. J. E. Park, 2030 Incheon Urban Regeneration Strategy Plan, Technical Report, Land & Housing Institute, Incheon, pp.81-84.
  15. N. D. Park, Investigation, evaluation, and countermeasures for vitalization of the original downtown area, Technical Report, Daejeon Development Institute, Daejeon, pp.67-77.
  16. S. W. Cho, Analysis on the Urban Decline in Incheon Using Multiple Deprivation Index, Technical Report, Incheon Development Institute, Incheon, pp.21-29.
  17. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Guidelines for Establishing Urban Regeneration Strategy Plan, Korea, pp.9-13.