DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on adhesion properties between composite material and aluminum according to the physical surface treatment technique

물리적 표면처리 기법에 따른 복합소재 및 알루미늄간 접합특성 연구

  • Kim, Moosun (Urban Transit Research Team, Korea Railroad Research Institute)
  • 김무선 (한국철도기술연구원 도시철도연구팀)
  • Received : 2020.10.06
  • Accepted : 2020.11.06
  • Published : 2020.11.30

Abstract

In this study, the adhesion properties between aluminum and composite materials, composite materials, and composite materials were compared according to the physical surface treatment to improve mechanical bonding at the bonding surface when considering carbon fiber and glass fiber-reinforced composite materials. Bonded specimens were classified into the type of base material and the surface treatment method of the bonding surface. Sandpaper, sandblasting, and plasma were applied as physical surface treatment methods. The bonded specimen was prepared as a single lap joint test specimen. An experiment to measure the lap shear strength was conducted, and the results were compared. The experimental results confirmed that the mechanical abrasion and sandblasting treatment improved the lap shear strength approximately 4 to 5 fold compared to the general specimen without physical surface treatment. In plasma treatment, the experiment was conducted by defining the respective plasma output and treatment time as follows: 150 W and 5 minutes, 150 W and 10 minutes, and 300 W and 3 minutes. Moreover, the lap shear strength results were similar to the previous mechanical surface treatments. On the other hand, the effect on the adhesion properties was small, depending on the plasma treatment conditions.

본 연구에서는 탄소섬유 및 유리섬유 강화 복합소재를 대상으로 하여, 접합면에 기계적인 결합력 향상을 위해 물리적인 표면처리 방법을 적용할 때, 알루미늄 및 복합소재, 복합소재 및 복합소재 간의 접합특성을 비교 분석하였다. 접합시편은 접합을 위해 쓰이는 모재 종류와 모재 접합면의 표면처리 방법으로 각각 구분하였다. 물리적인 표면처리 방법으로는 기계적인 마모 (사포) 처리, sand blasting 처리 및 플라즈마 처리기법을 적용하였다. 접합시편은 single lap joint 시편으로 제작하였으며 lap shear strength 측정 실험을 진행하여 그 결과값을 비교하였다. 실험 결과에서 기계적인 마모 및 sand blasting 표면 처리 방법이 물리적인 표면 처리를 진행하지 않은 일반 시편 대비하여 약 4~5배의 접합강도 향상이 있음을 확인하였다. 플라즈마 처리 기법을 적용한 방안에서는 플라즈마 출력과 처리 시간을 150 W 5분, 150 W 10분 및 300 W 3분 처리 조건으로 정의하여 실험을 진행하였으며, lap shear strength 결과에서 앞선 기계적 표면 처리 방안과 유사한 결과를 보였다. 다만 처리 조건에 따라서 접합특성에 미치는 영향은 적음을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. M.R.Gude, S.G.Prolongo, A.Urena, "Hygro thermal ageing of adhesive joints with nanoreinforced adhesives and different surface treatments of carbon fibre/epoxy substrates", International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, vol.40, pp.179-187, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.09.005
  2. M.Song, J.Kweon, J.Choi, H.Kim, M.Song, S.Shin, J.Byun, "Hygrothermal Effect on the Strength of Carbon/Epoxy Composite Single-Lap Bonded Joints ", Journal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences, vol.38, no.2, pp.119-128, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2010.38.2.119
  3. M.Lee, H.Kim, C.Kang, "Effect of Surface Roughness of Al5052/CFRP Composites on the Adhesion and Mechanical Properties", Composites Research, vol.26, no.5, pp.295-302, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7234/composres.2013.26.5.295
  4. F. Nihal, M. Tunalioglu, "The effect of finely-divided fillers on the adhesion strengths of epoxy-based adhesives", Composite Structures, vol.121, pp.296-303, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.007
  5. S.Y.On, M.S.Kim, S.S.Kim,"Effects of post-treatment of meta-aramid nanofiber mats on the adhesion strength of epoxy adhesive joints", Composite Structures, vol.159, pp.636-645, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.016
  6. D.Kwon, S. Park, J.Park, I.Kwon, "A Study on Bonding Process for Improvement of Adhesion Properties Between CFRP-Metal Dual Materials", Composite Research, vol.30, no.6, pp.416-421, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7234/composres.2017.30.6.416
  7. ASTM D1002-10, Standard Test Method for Apparent Shear Strength of Single-Lap-Joint Adhesively Bonded Metal Specimens by Tension Loading (Metal-to-Metal), ASTM, International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/D1002-10R19