Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Infrastructure Service Index for Citizen's Life Quality Improvement - Focused on Seoul -

지역주민의 수요를 반영한 인프라 서비스 수준 평가체계 제안 - 서울시 대상으로 -

  • 이슬기 (서울대학교 건설환경종합연구소) ;
  • 강태경 (한국건설기술연구원 건설정책연구소)
  • Received : 2020.07.17
  • Accepted : 2020.11.09
  • Published : 2020.11.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aimed to confirm the possibility of developing objective indexes for setting priorities and goals for the investment of government funds in infrastructure by examining citizens' demands for quality of life improvements. This study proposed a model that evaluates infrastructure service as a reflection of citizens' demands. The evaluation items of this model consisted of usability, accessibility, and recovery speed that citizens in the fields of transportation, water, energy, telecom, waste&environment, and living can experience. And the evaluation scale consisted of the likert 5-point scale for usability, and the average duration required for accessibility and recovery speed. Based on previous studies related to quality of life assessment, operating cases involving infrastructure assessment systems in advanced countries, and goals and guidelines for improving each sector of infrastructure that the government and public institutions have established. In order to verify the necessity of the proposed model, the infrastructure service was surveyed for 1,250 Seoul citizens. As a result, we confirmed that there are regional differences in demand and priority. It is expected to serve as the basis for establishing infrastructure policies to improve the people's living quality by continuously monitoring the demands of citizens through the development of the infrastructure service index.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 2020년도 한국연구재단 연구비 지원에 의한 결과의 일부임. 과제번호: 2020R1I1A1A01071545

References

  1. Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Source of collinearity, John Wiley and Sons
  2. Construction Economy News (2017). 1 hour and a half to commute to the metropolitan area...More than three times the OECD average, 2017.06.21.
  3. Construction & Economy Research Institute of Korea (2013). Understanding of the infrastructure evaluation system and suggesting directions for domestic adoption in UK and US developed country
  4. Daejeon Sejong Research Institute (2011). A study on analyzing transit patterns and improving transit system
  5. Enforcement Rules of the Education Environment Protection Act [Attached Table 1]
  6. Gyeonggi Research Institute (2000). A Study on Setting Indicators for Improving the Quality of Life of Gyeonggi-do People
  7. Gyeonggi Research Institute (2018). Improvement of elementary school attendance area that causes long-distance commuting
  8. http://qol.kostat.go.kr/blife/main.do
  9. https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/
  10. ICEE (2019). The rights of the people to the national infrastructure and Seoul Citizens' Experience of National Infrastructure, SNU ICEE Discussion Book No. 09
  11. Kim M.K. (2019). Establishment and operation of integrated infrastructure management system
  12. Korea Transportation Safety Authority (2017). Public transport status survey 2017
  13. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements (2016). Research to establish Highway Construction Plan (2016-2020)
  14. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements (2017). Research to develop performance index of the infrastructure
  15. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements (2018). Is the basic living SOC available within 10 minutes?
  16. Korea Research Institute for Local Administration (2014). Analyzing the quality of life in the local living area and suggesting ways to bridge the regional gap
  17. McKinsey Infrastructure Report (2017)
  18. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2016), 1st National Roads Comprehensive Plan(2016-2020)
  19. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, A guide to assessing urban sustainability and living infrastructure, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Order No.1127. 2018.12.21.
  20. Ministry of the Interior and Safety (2016). Research for the development of resident living environment indicators
  21. National Infrastructure Commission(2018). National Infrastructure Assessment
  22. National Infrastructure Commission (2016a). The National Infrastructure Assessment: consultation
  23. Office for Government Policy Coordination, Steering Group of Living SOC (2019). 3-year plan of living SOC (2020-2022)
  24. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2013). Comprehensive Development Plan for Urban Railway
  25. Seoul Metropolitan Government (2019). Urban Policy Index Survey Report (2018 Seoul Survey)
  26. The Canadian Infrastructure Report Card, Canadian Infrastructure Report Card Volume 1: 2012 Municipal Roads and Water Systems, 2012
  27. The Korea Transport Institute (2015). Comparative analysis of access transportation systems at major airports in Korea, Japan and China, Current Issue Analysis Report, 2015.12
  28. The Korea Transport Institute (2017). What is the regional accessibility of public transportation to major transportation facilities?, Press release 2017.12.26.
  29. The Seoul Institute (2017). SEOUL at a Glance 2017
  30. UK HM Treasury (2010). Strategy for national infrastructure
  31. WEF (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019
  32. WEF (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report 2017-2018
  33. www.asce.org