한국기록관리학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management)

  • 제20권4호
  • /
  • Pages.169-184
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1598-1487(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-7247(eISSN)
한국기록관리학회 (Korean Society of Archives and Records Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기록관리기관은 문화유산기관인가? 저작권법의 고아저작물 예외규정에서 기록관리기관 배제 문제 고찰

Are the Archives a Cultural Heritage Institution?: A Study on the Problems of Excluding the Archives from the Orphan Works Exemption in the Copyright Act of Korea

  • 이호신 (한성대학교 디지털인문정보학 트랙) ;
  • 정경희 (한성대학교 디지털인문정보학 트랙)
  • 투고 : 2020.10.26
  • 심사 : 2020.11.11
  • 발행 : 2020.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 저작권법 제35조의 4에 신설된 고아저작물 이용에 대한 예외규정의 문제점을 분석하고 그 개선을 위한 고려사항을 제안하기 위하여 기존 관련규정과 비교하여 분석하였다. 본 연구의 분석결과와 제안은 다음과 같다. (1) 본 예외규정이 운영 주체라는 요건으로만 적용대상 기관을 제한하고 하위법을 통하여 도서관, 박물관, 미술관에만 적용하는 것은 이 규정의 도입취지에 부합하지 않으므로 기록관리기관이 포함될 수 있도록 개정이 필요하다. (2) 저작권법 제31조 등과의 조화나 문화유산기관 소장자료가 상호 연계되어 가치있게 이용될 수 있도록 법 개정이 이루어져야 한다. (3) 기록관리기관에는 무수히 많은 미공표저작물이 보관되어 있음을 고려하여 고아저작물 예외규정이 미공표저작물에도 적용되도록 개정될 필요가 있다.

This study analyzed the issues on Article 35-4 of the Copyright Act of Korea, a new provision on the use of orphan works. The new provision was compared to other related provisions, and considerations were suggested for their improvement. The main results are summarized as follows: (1) Article 35-4 is contradictory to other provisions and needs further revisions as it limits the subject of application to the main body of operation and applies only to some libraries, museums, and galleries through its ordinances; (2) a new provision on the use of orphan works must be applied to archives to harmonize with Article 31 and use the interconnection between cultural heritage institutions more beneficially; and (3) considering that there are many unpublished works in the archives, Article 35-4 should be revised to also be applicable to those works.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, Young-Yeol (2012). A study on improvement of the copyright management system for public records. master's thesis, Dept of Records & Archives Management Science, The Graduate School of Chung-Ang University.
  2. Heo, Sun (2008). A study on measures to guarantee the access right to public records: on the copyright. master's thesis, Program in Archival Science, The Graduate School, Seoul National University.
  3. Lee, Chul-nam (2017). Discussions on the copyright issues of the intangible heritage archive. Korean Journal of Intangible Heritage, 2, 107-127.
  4. Lee, In Chang (2015). A study on copyrights issues with regard to the use of Public Records. master's thesis, Department of Intellectual Property Law, Graduate School of Legal Studies, Korea University.
  5. Lim, Won-sun (2020). Copyright Law. 6th ed. Jinju: Korea Copyright Commission.
  6. Roh, Hyeon Sook (2013). Applying extended collective licensing to orphan works. Copyright Quarterly, 26(3), 165-197.
  7. Suh, Hye-Ran (2005). Collaboration between libraries and archives for the preservation and use of documentary heritage. Journal of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 16(2), 25-41.
  8. Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications (2020. 8. 13). Copyright access reforms. Retrieved August 30, 2020 from https://www.communications.gov.au/departmental-news/copyright-access-reforms.
  9. Dickson, M. (2010). Due diligence, futile effort: copyright and the digitization of the Thomas E. Watson Papers. American Archivist, 73, 626-636. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.73.2.16rh811120280434
  10. Gill, T. & Miller P. (2002). Reinventing the wheel? Standards, interoperability and digital cultural content. D-Lib Magazine, 8(1). Retrieved August 15, 2020 from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january02/gill/01gill.html
  11. Intellectual Property Litigation KL Gates (2020. 9. 28). Proposed Copyright Reform In Australia- Limited Liability Scheme For Use Of Orphan Works. Retrieved August 8, 2020 from https://www.natlawreview.com/article/proposed-copyright-reform-australia-limited-liability-scheme-use-orphan-works
  12. Ling, P. (2020). Significant Revisions to the Swiss Copyright Act. Retrieved August 20, 2020 from https://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2020/04/significant-revisions-to-swiss.html
  13. Minister for Communications, Cyber Safety and the Arts (2020). Copyright refroms to better support the digital environment. Retrieved August 18, 2020 from https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/fletcher/media-release/copyright-reforms-better-support-digital-environment
  14. Robinson, H. (2012). Remembering things differently: museums, libraries and archives as memory institutions and the implications for convergence, Museum Management and Curatorship, 27(4), 413-429, https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2012.720188
  15. SAA. (2005). Re: Response by the Society of American Archivists to the Notice of Inquiry Concerning Orphan Works, 70 FR 3739 January 26, 2005. Retrieved September 9, 2020, https://www.copyright.gov/orphan/comments/reply/OWR0088-SAA.pdf
  16. SAA. (2009). Orphan works: statement of best practices. Retrieved August 10, 2020, from https://www2.archivists.org/sites/all/files/OrphanWorks-June2009.pdf
  17. SAA. (2013). Re: Notice of Inquiry on "Orphan Works and Mass Digitization." Retrieved June 22, 2020 from https://www.copyright.gov/orphan/comments/noi_10222012/Society-American-Archivists.pdf
  18. Sutton, D. (2019). Background paper on archives and copyright. Retrieved. September 20. 2020 from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/copyright/en/sccr_38/sccr_38_7.pdf
  19. Trant, J. (2009). Emerging convergence? Thoughts on museums, archives, libraries, and professional training. Museum Management and Curatorship, 24(4), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770903314738