Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical interventions and speech outcomes for individuals with submucous cleft palate

  • Jung, Seung Eun (Division of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Audiology and Speech Pathology Research Institute, Hallym University) ;
  • Ha, Seunghee (Division of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Audiology and Speech Pathology Research Institute, Hallym University) ;
  • Koh, Kyung S. (Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Oh, Tae Suk (Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center)
  • Received : 2020.04.17
  • Accepted : 2020.08.20
  • Published : 2020.11.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background This study aimed to identify the initial diagnostic characteristics and treatment status of children with submucous cleft palate (SMCP) and to examine the relationship between the timing of surgical correction and the degree of articulation and resonance improvement. Methods This retrospective study included 72 children diagnosed with SMCP between 2008 and 2016. The evaluation criteria were the age of the initial visit, total number of visits, age at the end of treatment, speech problems, resonance problems, and speech therapy. Results Children with SMCP first visited the hospital at an average age of 34.32 months, and speech problems were identified at an average age of 48.53 months. Out of 72 children, 46 underwent surgery at an average age of 49.74 months. Four of these children required secondary surgery at an average age of 83.5 months. Among the children who underwent surgery before 3 years of age, 70% exhibited articulation improvements, with mild-to-moderate hypernasality. Articulation improvements showed no statistically significant differences according to age at the time of surgery. However, children who underwent surgery before 4 years had a better hypernasality rating than those who underwent surgery after 4 years of age. Conclusions Children with SMCP tend to undergo delayed treatment because the anatomical symptoms in some children with SMCP are unclear, and surgical interventions are considered only after speech problems are clarified. Starting interventions as early as possible reduces the likelihood of receiving secondary surgery and speech therapy, while increasing expectations for positive speech function at the end.

Keywords

References

  1. Calnan J. Submucous cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 1954;14:1:84-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-195407000-00018
  2. ten Dam E, van der Heijden P, Korsten-Meijer AG, et al. Age of diagnosis and evaluation of consequences of submucous cleft palate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013;77:1019-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.03.036
  3. Abdel-Aziz M. Treatment of submucous cleft palate by pharyngeal flap as a primary procedure. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007;71:1093-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.03.019
  4. Al-Zajrawee MZ, Aljodah MA, Hassan QA. Surgical outcomes of 14 consecutive bilateral cleft lip patients treated with a modified version of the Millard and Manchester methods. Arch Plast Surg 2019;46:114-21. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2018.00332
  5. Weatherley-White RC, Sakura CY Jr, Brenner LD, et al. Submucous cleft palate: its incidence, natural history, and indications for treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972;49:297-304. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197203000-00010
  6. Garcia Velasco M, Ysunza A, Hernandez X, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of submucous cleft palate: a review of 108 cases. Cleft Palate J 1988;25:171-3.
  7. Gosain AK, Conley SF, Marks S, et al. Submucous cleft palate: diagnostic methods and outcomes of surgical treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;97:1497-509. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199606000-00032
  8. Reiter R, Brosch S, Wefel H, et al. The submucous cleft palate: diagnosis and therapy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011;75:85-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.10.015
  9. Ha KM, Cleland H, Greensmith A, et al. Submucous cleft palate: an often-missed diagnosis. J Craniofac Surg 2013;24: 878-85. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31827fef4b
  10. Oji T, Sakamoto Y, Ogata H, et al. A 25-year review of cases with submucous cleft palate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013;77:1183-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.04.033
  11. McWilliams BJ. Submucous clefts of the palate: how likely are they to be symptomatic? Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991; 28:247-9. https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569_1991_028_0247_scotph_2.3.co_2
  12. Kummer AW. Cleft palate and craniofacial anomalies: effects on speech and resonance. Toronto: Nelson Education; 2013.
  13. Ruslin M, Dom L, Tajrin A, et al. Establishing cleft services in developing countries: complications of cleft lip and palate surgery in rural areas of Indonesia. Arch Plast Surg 2019;46: 511-7. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2018.00493
  14. Kappen IFPM, Bittermann D, Janssen L, et al. Long-term follow-up study of young adults treated for unilateral complete cleft lip, alveolus, and palate by a treatment protocol including two-stage palatoplasty: speech outcomes. Arch Plast Surg 2017;44:202-9. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.202
  15. Pensler JM, Bauer BS. Levator repositioning and palatal lengthening for submucous clefts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988; 82:765-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198811000-00006
  16. Abyholm FE. Submucous cleft palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1976;10:209-12. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844317609012970
  17. Baek RM, Kim BK, Jeong JH, et al. The effect of age at surgery and compensatory articulation on speech outcome in submucous cleft palate patients treated with double-opposing Z-plasty: a 10-year experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017;70:646-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2016.12.025
  18. Ettinger RE, Kung TA, Wombacher N, et al. Timing of Furlow palatoplasty for patients with submucous cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2018;55:430-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665617726989
  19. Smyth AG. Submucous cleft palate: outcomes after primary repair with repositioning of the levator muscle in 51 consecutive patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;54:561-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.02.034
  20. Reiter R, Haase S, Brosch S. Submucous cleft palate: an often late diagnosed malformation. Laryngorhinootologie 2010;89:29-33. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1234044
  21. Boyce JO, Kilpatrick N, Morgan AT. Speech and language characteristics in individuals with nonsyndromic submucous cleft palate: a systematic review. Child Care Health Dev 2018;44:818-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12613
  22. Ezzat AE, El-Begermy MM, Eid MI, et al. The effects of palatal lengthening on the functional and speech outcomes after submucous cleft palate repair. Otolaryngol Pol 2016;70: 41-8.
  23. Ng ZY, Young SE, Por YC, et al. Results of primary repair of submucous cleft palate with Furlow palatoplasty in both syndromic and nonsyndromic children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2015;52:525-31. https://doi.org/10.1597/14-179
  24. Sommerlad BC, Fenn C, Harland K, et al. Submucous cleft palate: a grading system and review of 40 consecutive submucous cleft palate repairs. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004;41: 114-23. https://doi.org/10.1597/02-102
  25. Gilleard O, Sell D, Ghanem AM, et al. Submucous cleft palate: a systematic review of surgical management based on perceptual and instrumental analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2014;51:686-95. https://doi.org/10.1597/13-046
  26. Bezuhly M, Fischbach S, Klaiman P, et al. Impact of 22q deletion syndrome on speech outcomes following primary surgery for submucous cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;129:502e-510e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402e52
  27. Swanson JW, Mitchell BT, Cohen M, et al. The effect of Furlow palatoplasty timing on speech outcomes in submucous cleft palate. Ann Plast Surg 2017;79:156-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001056