References
- Abraham, K. S. (1996), "A Theory of Insurance Policy Interpretation", Michigan Law Review, 95(3), 531-557. https://doi.org/10.2307/1290161
- Ayres, I. (2006), "Ya-Huh: There Are and Should Be Penalty Defaults", Florida State University Law Review, 33, 589-597.
- Ayres, I. and R. Gertner (1989), "Filling Gaps in Incomplete Contracts: An Economic Theory of Default Rules", Yale Law Journal, 99(1), 81-97.
- Baker, T. and K. D. Louge (2015), "Mandatory Rules and Default Rules in Insurance Contracts", in Schwarz, D. and Siegelman, P.(eds.), Research Handbook on the Economics of Insurance Law, London: Edward Elgar Publishing, 379-401.
- Ben-Shahar, O. (2009), "A Bargaining Power Theory of Default Rules", Columbia Law Review, 109(2), 396-430.
- Ben-Shahar, O. (2011), "Fixing Unfair Contracts", Stanford Law Review, 63, 869-906.
- Boardman, M. E. (2006), "Contra Proferentem: The Allure of Ambiguous Boilerplate", Michigan Law Review, 104(5), 1105-1126.
- Boardman, M. E. (2013), "Penalty Default Rules in Insurance Law", Florida State University Law Review, 40(2), 305-348.
- Burton, S. J. (2016), "Collapsing Illusions: Standards for Setting Efficient Contract and Other Defaults", Indiana Law Journal, 91(3), 1062-1080.
- Calfee, J. E. and R. Craswell(1986), "Deterrence and Uncertain Legal Standards", Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 2(2), 279-303.
- Choi, Jun-Gyu (2011), "Interpretation of Insurance Contract and Contra Proferentem Rule-Focused on the Recent Supreme Court Cases-", Business Finance Law, 48, Center of Finance Law, 39-53.
- Cohen, G. M. (2011), "Interpretation and Implied Terms in Contract Law", in De Geest, G., et al.(eds.), Contract Law and Economics, London: Edwards Elgar Publishing, 130-141.
- Fischer, J. M. (1992), Why Are Insurance Contracts Subject to Special Rules of Interpretation?: Text Versus Context", Arizona State Law Journal, 24, 995-1023.
- Gilman, J., et al. (2018), Arnould's Law of Marine Insurance and Average, 19th ed., London: Sweet & Maxwell.
- Horton, D. (2009), "Flipping the Script: Contra Proferentem and Standard form Contracts", University of Colorado Law Review, 80(1), 431-479.
- Lee, Jae-Hyun (2012), "The Features of Contra Proferentem as the Interpretational Principle of an Insurance Agreement and its Applicable Limits-Review on the Validity of the Verdicts Recently Made Based upon Contra Proferentem-", Korea Insurance Law Journal, 6(2), 7-37.
- Keeton, R. E. (1970), "Insurance Law Rights at Variance with Policy Provisions", Harvard Law Review, 83, 961-969. https://doi.org/10.2307/1339729
- Kim, Chin-Woo (2011), "Eine uberlegung zur Auslegungsregel von AGB-Ein Rechtsvergleich zum europaischen Recht im Hinblick auf die objektive Auslegung und contra proferentem-Regel-", The Journal of Property Law, 28(3), 179-206.
- Kurita, Sho (2017), "On the Ambiguity of the Rules of Interpretation in the General Terms and Conditions of the Transaction-the Effect of the Change in the Concept of Contract in the German Common Law on the Rules of Interpretation-", Shinshu Economics and Law Review, 2, Nagano: Shinshu University, 121-144.
- Miller, D. S. (1988), "Insurance as Contract: The Argument for Abandoning the Ambiguity Doctrine", Columbia Law Review, 88(8), 1849-1872. https://doi.org/10.2307/1122606
- Nardoni, S. C. (2013), "A Study of Ambiguity: Does Illinois Law Permit Insurers to Submit Extrinsic Evidence to Resolve Insurance Policy Ambiguities?", Loyola Consumer Law Review, 25(4), 378-402.
- Park, Sirl-A (2016), A Study of the Interpretation of Standard Form Contracts(Doctoral Dissertation), Seoul: Seoul University.
- Posner, E. A. (2006), "Default Rules in Private and Public Law: An Exchange on Penalty Default Rules: There Are No Penalty Default Rules in Contract Law", Florida State University Law Review, 33, 563-580.
- Posner, R. A. (2004), "The Law and Economics of Contract Interpretation", Texas Law Review, 83, p.1581-1614.
- Rahdert, M. C. (1986), "Reasonable Expectations Reconsidered", Connecticut Law Review, 18, 323-351.
- Rappaport, M. B. (1995), "The Ambiguity Rule and Insurance Law: Why Insurance Contracts Should not Be Construed Against the Drafter", Georgia Law Review, 30, 171-233.
- Schwarcz, D. (2007), "A Product Liability Theory for the Judicial Regulation of Insurance Policies", William & Mary Law Review, 48, 1389-1433.
- Schwarcz, D. (2011), "Reevaluating Standardized Insurance Policies", University of Chicago Law Review, 78(4), 1263-1348.
- Seo, Hee-Sok (2017), "Regulation on Standard Terms and Conditions and Contract Law", Law Review, 41(3), 41-82.
- Solan, L., T. Rosenblatt and D. Osherson (2008), "False Consensus Bias in Contract Interpretation", Columbia Law Review, 108, 1268-1300.
- Stempel, J. W. (1994), Interpretation of Insurance Contracts, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
- Stempel, J. W. (2010), "The Insurance Policy as Social Instrument and Social Institution", William & Mary Law Review, 51, 1489-1582.
- Swisher, P. N. (2000), "A Realistic Consensus Approach to the Insurance Law Doctrine of Reasonable Exception", Tort & Insurance Law Journal, 35(3), 729-779.
- Ueda, Seiichirou (2003), Limitations of Contract Interpretation and Rules for Interpretation of Unclear Terms, Tokyo: Nihonhyouronnsya.
- Yamammoto, Tomonobu (2018), Insurance Law(1), Tokyo: Yuuhikaku.
- Yamamoto, Tetsuo (2020), "On the Contra Proferentem Rule", Study of Non-Life Insurance, 81(4), Tokyo: The General Insurance Institute of Japan, 9-38.
- Zamir, E. (2013), "Contract Law and Theory: Three Views of the Cathedral", University of Chicago Law Review, 81, 2077-2123.