DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mitigation of wind-induced responses of cylinder solar tower by a tiny eddy current tuned mass damper based on elastic wind tunnel tests

  • Liu, Min (Key Laboratory for Wind and Bridge Engineering of Hunan Province, College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University) ;
  • Li, Shouying (Key Laboratory for Wind and Bridge Engineering of Hunan Province, College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University) ;
  • Chen, Zhengqing (Key Laboratory for Wind and Bridge Engineering of Hunan Province, College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University)
  • Received : 2019.12.02
  • Accepted : 2020.07.29
  • Published : 2020.11.25

Abstract

Solar towers, which often has a large aspect ratio and low fundamental natural frequency, were extremely prone to large amplitude of wind-induced vibrations, especially Vortex-Induced Vibration (VIV). A tiny Tuned Mass Damper (TMD) with conveniently adjustable eddy current damping was specially designed and manufactured for elastic wind tunnel tests of a solar tower. A series of numerical simulations by using the COMSOL software were conducted to determine three key parameters, including the thickness of the back iron plate and the conductive plate (Tb and Tc), the distance between the magnet and the conductive plate (Td). Based on the results of numerical simulations, a tiny TMD was manufactured and its structural parameters were experimentally identified. The optimized values of the tiny TMD can be conveniently realized. The tiny TMD was installed at the top of the elastic test model of a 243-meter-high solar tower, and a series of wind tunnel tests were carried out to examine the effectiveness of the TMD in suppressing wind-induced responses of the test model. The results showed that the wind-induced responses could be obviously reduced by the TMD, especially in the cross-wind direction. The cross-wind RMS and peak responses at the critical wind velocity can be reduced by about 86% and 75%, respectively. However, the maximum reduction of the responses at the design wind velocity is about 45%, obviously less than that at the critical wind velocity.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This project is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFC0703600 and No. 2017YFC0703604).

References

  1. Bae, J.S., Kwak, M.K. and Inman, D.J. (2005), "Vibration suppression of cantilever beam using eddy current damper", J. Sound Vib., 284(3-5), 805-824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.07.031.
  2. Bandi, E.K., Tamura, Y., Yoshida, A., Kim, Y.C. and Yang, Q.S. (2013), "Experimental investigation on aerodynamic characteristics of various triangular-section high-rise buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 122, 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.07.002.
  3. Brownjohn, J.M.W., Carden, E.P., Goddard, C.R. and Oudin, G. (2010), "Real-time performance monitoring of tuned mass damper system for a 183 m reinforced concrete chimney", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 98, 169-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2009.10.013.
  4. CICIND (1999), Model Code for Steel Chimneys: Revistion 1 - 1999, Hemel Hempstead, London, UK.
  5. Cunningham, R.E. (1986), Passive eddy-current damping as a means of vibration control in cryogenic turbomachinery, NASA-TP-2562, NASA, USA.
  6. Den Hartog, J.P. (1956), Mechanical Vibrations, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
  7. Duan, Y.Y., Wang, W.X., Zhang, P., Huo, L.S. and Song, G. (2020), "New type of pounding tuned mass damper for confined space", J. Aerosp. Eng., 33(4), 04019053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001138.
  8. Ebrahimi, B., Khamesee, M.B. and Golnaraghi, F. (2009), "Eddy current damper feasibility in automobile suspension: Modeling, simulation and testing", Smart Mater. Struct., 18(1), 015017. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/18/1/015017.
  9. Facioni, R.J., Kwok, K.C.S. and Samali, B. (1993), "Wind tunnel investigation of active vibration control of tall buildings", Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Pacific Symposium on Wind Engineering, Hong Kong, December.
  10. Gonzalez-Roubaud, E., Perez-Osorio, D. and Prieto, C. (2017), "Review of commercial thermal benergy storage in concentrated solar power plants: Steam vs. molten salts", Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 80, 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.084.
  11. Gunter, E.J., Humphris, R.R. and Severson, S.J. (1983), Design study of magnetic eddy-current vibration suppression dampers for application to cryogenic turbomachinery, NASA-CR-173273, University of Virginia, USA.
  12. Huang, Z.W., Hua, X.G., Chen, Z.Q. and Niu, H.W. (2018), "Modeling, testing, and validation of an eddy current damper for structural vibration control", J. Aerosp. Eng., 31(5), 04018063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000891.
  13. Isyumov, N., Dutton, R. and Davenport, A.G. (1989), "Aerodynamic methods for mitigating wind-induced building motions, structural design, analysis and testing", Proceedings of the Structure Congress '89, ASCE, New York, USA, August.
  14. Kawamura, M., Maebayashi, K. and Shimada, K. (1993), "Application of a tuned mass damper system using laminated rubber bearing to a tower structure (Design, test and recorded vibration during typhoons)", Proceedings of International Conference on Tall Buildings, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, October.
  15. Kienholz, D.A., Pendleton, S.C. and Richards Jr, K.E. (1994), "Demonstration of solar array vibration suppression", Proceedings of the North American Conference on Smart Structures and Materials, Orlando, USA, June.
  16. Kim, Y.C., Tamura, Y., Tanaka, H., Ohtake, K., Bandi, E.K. and Yoshida, A. (2014), "Wind-induced responses of super-tall buildings with various atypical building shapes", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 133, 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.06.004.
  17. Kim, Y.C., Bandi, E.K., Yoshida, A. and Tamura, Y. (2015), "Response characteristics of super-tall buildings - effects of number of sides and helical angle", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 145, 252-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.07.001.
  18. Kitamura, K., Ohkuma, T., Kanda, J., Mataki, Y. and Kawahata, S. (1988), "Chiba port tower: Full-scale measurement of wind actions (part 1) organisation, measurement system and strong wind data", J. Wind Eng., 37, 401-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90661-S.
  19. Koshimura, K., Tatsumi, M. and Hata, K. (1994), "Vibration control of the main towers of the Akashi Kaikyo Bridge", Proceedings of the 1st Int. Conference on Structure Control, Pasadena, USA, August.
  20. Kwak, M.K., Lee, M.I. and Heo, S. (2003), "Vibration suppression using eddy current damper", Korean Soc. Noise Vib. Eng., 233,136-141.
  21. Kwok, K.C.S. (1983), "Full-scale measurements of wind-induced response of Sydney tower", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 14, 307-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(83)90033-8.
  22. Larose, G.L., Larsen, A. and Svensson, E. (1995), "Modelling of tuned mass dampers for wind-tunnel tests on a full-bridge aeroelastic model", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 54, 427-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)00058-L.
  23. Li, S.Y., Liu, M., Li, H.X., Hui, Y. and Chen, Z.Q. (2018), "Effects of structural damping on wind-induced responses of a 243-meter-high solar tower based on a novel elastic test model", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 172, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.10.027.
  24. Liu, M., Li, S.Y., Li, H.X., Li, S.K. and Chen, Z.Q. (2019), "Reynolds number effects on the wind-induced responses of a 243-meter-high solar tower in elastic wind tunnel tests", ASCE J. Aerosp. Eng., 32(4), 04019053. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001033.
  25. Lou, W.J., Wen, Z.P., Chen, Y. and Huang, M.F. (2019), "Wind tunnel study on bidirectional vibration control of lattice towers with omnidirectional cantilever-type eddy current TMD", Appl. Sci., 9(15), 2978. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9152978.
  26. Lu, X.L. and Chen, J.R. (2011), "Mitigation of wind-induced responses of Shanghai center tower by tuned mass damper", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 20(4), 435-452. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.659.
  27. Lu, X., Zhang, Q., Weng, D., Zhou, Z., Wang, S., Mahin, S.A., Ding, S. and Qian, F. (2017), "Improving performance of a super tall building using a new eddy-current tuned mass damper", Struct. Control Health Monit., 24(3), e1882. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1882.
  28. Mariantonieta, G.S. and Hojjat, A. (2013), "Tuned mass dampers", Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 20, 419-431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1183-013-9091-7.
  29. Mcnamara, R.J. and Taylor, D.P. (2003), "Fluid viscous dampers for high-rise buildings", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 12(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.218.
  30. Narkhede, D.I. and Sinha, R. (2014), "Behavior of nonlinear fluid viscous dampers for control of shock vibration", J. Sound Vib., 333(1), 80-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.08.041.
  31. Ohtake, K., Mataki, Y., Nagase, T. and Hisakotu, T. (1992), "Fullscale measurement of wind actions on super high-rise office building in Osaka", Summ. Tech. Papers Ann. Meeting Arch. Inst. Japan, 2009, 17-18.
  32. Quan, Y. and Gu, M. (2005), "Experimental evaluation of aerodynamic damping of square super high-rise buildings", Wind Struct., Int. J., 8(5), 309-324. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2005.8.5.309.
  33. Sacks, M.P. and Swallow, J.C. (1993), "Tuned mass dampers for towers and buildings", Proceedings of the Symposium on Structural Engineering in Natural Hazards Mitigation, Irvine, California, USA, April.
  34. Sakamoto, H., Araki, K., Ishida, A., Kobayashi, S. and Kuwahara, T. (1997), "Design of permanent magnet type compact ECB retarder", SAE Technical Paper 973228, Warrendale, USA.
  35. Tahri, M., Hakdaoui, M. and Maanan, M. (2015), "The evaluation of solar farm locations applying geographic information system and multi-criteria decision-making methods: Case study in southern Morocco", 51, 1354-1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.054.
  36. Tamura, Y., Xu, X.D., Tanaka, H., Kim, Y.C., Yoshida, A. and Yang, Q.S. (2017), "Aerodynamic and pedestrian-level wind characteristics of super-tall buildings with various configurations", Procedia Eng., 199, 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.146.
  37. Tanaka, H. and Mak, C.Y. (1983), "Effect of tuned mass dampers on wind induced response of tall buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 14(1-3), 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(83)90037-5.
  38. Tanaka, H., Tamura, T., Ohtake, K., Nakai, M. and Kim, Y.C. (2012), "Experimental investigation of aerodynamic forces and wind pressures acting on tall buildings with various unconventional configurations", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 107-108, 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.04.014.
  39. Tuan, A.Y. and Shang, G.Q. (2014), "Vibration control in a 101-storey building using a tuned mass damper", J. Appl. Sci. Eng., 17(2), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.6180/jase.2014.17.205.
  40. Vickery, B.J. and Davenport, A.G. (1971), "An investigation of the behaviour in wind of the proposed Centrepoint tower, in Sydney, Australia", Engineering Science Report BLWT-1-70, University of Western Ontario, Canada.
  41. Wang, W.X., Hua, X.G., Wang, X.Y., Chen, Z.Q. and Song, G. (2018a), "Numerical modeling and experimental study on a novel pounding tuned mass damper", J. Vib. Control, 24(17), 4023-4036. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546317718714.
  42. Wang, W.X., Hua, X.G., Wang, X.Y., Chen, Z.Q. and Song, G. (2018b), "Mechanical behavior of magnetorheological dampers after long-term operation in a cable vibration control system", Struct. Control Health Monit., 26(1), e2280. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2280.
  43. Wen, Q., Hua, X.G., Chen, Z.Q., Yang, Y. and Niu, H.W. (2016), "Control of human-induced vibrations of a curved cable-stayed bridge: design, implementation, and field validation", J. Bridge Eng., 21(7), 04016028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000887.
  44. Xu, H.B., Zhang, C.W., Li, H., Tan, P., Ou, J.P. and Zhou, F.L. (2014), "Active mass driver control system for suppressing wind-induced vibration of the Canton Tower", Smart Struct. Syst., Int. J., 13(2), 281-303. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.2.281.
  45. Zdravkovich, M.M. (1981), "Review and classification of various aerodynamic and hydrodynamic means for suppressing vortex shedding", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 7(2), 145-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(81)90036-2.

Cited by

  1. Wind-Induced Vibration Control of High-Rise Structures Using Compound Damping Cables vol.2021, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5537622