DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Role for Social Media in Pediatric Liver Disease: Caregiver and Provider Perspectives

  • Mogul, Douglas B. (Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine) ;
  • Bowring, Mary Grace (Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lau, Jennifer (Parent Advocate) ;
  • Babin, Erin (Parent Advocate) ;
  • Bridges, John F.P. (Department of Surgery, Ohio State University) ;
  • Harpavat, Sanjiv (Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital) ;
  • Miloh, Tamir (Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami)
  • 투고 : 2020.03.09
  • 심사 : 2020.06.16
  • 발행 : 2020.11.15

초록

Purpose: To better understand the benefits and harms of engagement with online pediatric liver disease communities within social media. Methods: We conducted a survey of caregivers of children with liver disease participating in online pediatric liver disease communities within social media, as well as a survey of healthcare providers (e.g., physicians, surgeons, nurse coordinators) from this field to better understand the perceived benefits and harms of participation. Results: Among 138 caregivers of children with liver disease that completed the survey, 97.8% agreed social media was a good place to learn about patient experiences and 88% agreed it was a good source of general information. Among caregivers, 84.8% agreed social media helps them to better advocate for their child. While 18% agreed that the information over social media was equal to the information from their healthcare team and 19% neither agreed/disagreed, only 3% indicated they would use this information to change care without telling their provider; in contrast, among 217 healthcare providers, 55% believed social media may lead caregivers to change management without telling their team. Conclusion: Engagement with online disease-specific communities in social media yields several benefits for caregivers and, in contrast to healthcare providers' concerns, participation is unlikely to lead to problems including caregivers changing the treatment plan without first discussing these plans with their team. Openness between caregivers and medical teams about the role for social media can help to improve trust and maximize the potential benefits of engagement with these groups.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hitlin P. Internet, social media use and device ownership in U.S. have plateaued after years of growth [Internet]. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2018 Sep 28 [cited 2019 Aug 2]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/09/28/internet-social-media-use-and-device-ownership-in-u-s-have-plateaued-after-years-of-growth/
  2. Price Waterhouse Cooper Health Research Institute. Social media "likes" healthcare: from marketing to social business [Internet]. New York: PricewaterhouseCoopers; 2012 Apr [cited 2018 Sep 11]. Available from: https://www.pwc.com/us/en/health-industries/health-research-institute/publications/health-care-social-media.html
  3. U.S. Congress. Rare Diseases Act of 2002 [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress; 2002 [cited 2019 Nov 26]. Available from: https://history.nih.gov/research/downloads/PL107-280.pdf
  4. Arya G, Balistreri WF. Pediatric liver disease in the United States: epidemiology and impact. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002;17:521-5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02678.x
  5. Sokol RJ, Mack C, Narkewicz MR, Karrer FM. Pathogenesis and outcome of biliary atresia: current concepts. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2003;37:4-21. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005176-200307000-00003
  6. Yoon PW, Bresee JS, Olney RS, James LM, Khoury MJ. Epidemiology of biliary atresia: a population-based study. Pediatrics 1997;99:376-82. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.99.3.376
  7. Mogul DB, Henderson ML, Bridges JFP. Expanding the Facebook platform to engage and educate online communities. Am J Gastroenterol 2018;113:457-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2017.450
  8. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2008.
  9. White K, Gebremariam A, Lewis D, Nordgren W, Wedding J, Pasek J, et al. Motivations for participation in an online social media community for diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2018;12:712-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296817749611
  10. Alvarez-Perea A, Cabrera-Freitag P, Fuentes-Aparicio V, Infante S, Zapatero L, Zubeldia JM. Social media as a tool for the management of food allergy in children. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2018;28:233-40. https://doi.org/10.18176/jiaci.0235
  11. Ridout B, Campbell A. The use of social networking sites in mental health interventions for young people: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2018;20:e12244. https://doi.org/10.2196/12244
  12. Rocha HM, Savatt JM, Riggs ER, Wagner JK, Faucett WA, Martin CL. Incorporating social media into your support tool box: points to consider from genetics-based communities. J Genet Couns 2018;27:470-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0170-z
  13. Jacobs R, Boyd L, Brennan K, Sinha CK, Giuliani S. The importance of social media for patients and families affected by congenital anomalies: a Facebook cross-sectional analysis and user survey. J Pediatr Surg 2016;51:1766-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.07.008
  14. Nicholl H, Tracey C, Begley T, King C, Lynch AM. Internet use by parents of children with rare conditions: findings from a study on parents' web information needs. J Med Internet Res 2017;19:e51. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5834