Korean journal of aerospace and environmental medicine (항공우주의학회지)

Aerospace Medical Association of Korea (한국항공우주의학협회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Pilot Fatigue Measurement Methods for Fatigue Risk Management

피로위험관리를 위한 조종사 피로측정방법 고찰

  • Kim, Daeho (Republic of Korea Air Force Aviation Safety Agency)
  • Received : 2020.07.12
  • Accepted : 2020.08.03
  • Published : 2020.08.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Pilot fatigue is a great hazard to aviation safety. In recent years, long-distance fights have been increasing and flight hours have been increasing, which has made fatigue issues important. International organizations in the aviation sectors (ICAO, FAA, IATA etc.) recommend management of fatigue within the SMS (Safety Management System) framework. A scientific and systematic approach to measuring fatigue is required as a prerequisite to preparing safety management measures for pilot's fatigue. Therefore, in this study, I would like to consider recent trends and implications for fatigue measurement. First, I aimed to consider recent the accident cases related to fatigue. Second, I also considered how to measure the pilot's fatigue. Finally, the direction of the countermeasures against fatigue through fatigue measurement was developed and suggested.

Keywords

References

  1. ICAO. Annex 19, Safety Management. 2016
  2. ICAO. Doc9859, Safety Management Manual. 2018
  3. Craig PA. The killing zone: How and Why Pilots Die, New York, NY McGraw-Hill. 2001.
  4. ICAO. Fatigue Risk Management System (FRMS), ICAO Annex 6 part 1. 2010.
  5. EASA. Draft Opinion of the European Aviation Safety Agency for a Commission Regulation Establishing the Implementing Rules on Flight and Duty Time Limitations and Rest Requirements for Commercial Air Transport(CAT) with Aeroplanes, Technical Report EASA NPA 2010-14. 2010.
  6. IATA. Flight &Duty Time Limitations Fatigue Risk Management. 2009.
  7. KCA. Aviation Statistics. 2017.
  8. Kwon PJ. A Study on the Necessity of Strategic Transport Appropriate to the Korean peninsula, Mokwon University. 2009.
  9. Li G, Baker SP, Grabowski JG, Rebok GW. Factors Associated with Pilot Error in Aviation Crashes, Aviation, Space, and Environmental medicine. 2001;72(1):52-58.5.
  10. CAA. CAP 1756, Independent Research on Pilot Fatigue Measurement by the Netherlands Aerospace Centre. 2019.
  11. NTSB. AAR-00-01(PB00-910401). 1997.
  12. NTSB. AAR-1401(PB2014-105984). 2013.
  13. ASN (Aviation Safety Network). http://www.aviation-safety.net.
  14. Kim DH. How Critical is the Fatigue Management for Pilots in Aviation Safety? - A Review, an Investigation and Some Critical Needs-, The Korean Journal of Aerospace and Environmental Medicine. 2013;23(2):31-38.
  15. Dinges DF. An overview of sleepiness and accidents, Journal of Sleep Research, 1995;4 Suppl 2:4-14 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2869.1995.tb00220.x
  16. Miller K, Finnigan F, Hammersley RH. Is Residual Impairment after Alcohol an Effect of Repeated Performance?, Aviation, Space, and Environmental medicine. 1999;70(2): 124-130.
  17. Park HB. Flight and Human Body, GyechukMunwhasa. 1991.
  18. Choi JH, Barde S, Kim JH. Trend of Convergence Technology between Healthcare and the IoT, Information & Telecommunication. 2014;10-16.
  19. Kim KH, Lim CY. Wearable Health Device Technology in the IoT Era, The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers. 2016;18-22.
  20. Kim SY, Han SB, Kim HR, Jung YS, Jung JS, Park SJ. Development of Fatigue-Stress Measurement Technique and DB, KAIST. 1998.
  21. Kim HS. The effect of Different Types of Shift Work on the Sleep and Body Temperature of Circadian Rhythm, Seoul University. 1992.
  22. Kim DS. Optimal Application of Pilot Biometric Signals to Field, ROKAF Report of Combat Experiment Task. 2013.
  23. ICAO. Doc 9966, Manual for the Oversight of Fatigue Management Approaches. 2016.
  24. IATA. Fatigue Management Guide for Airline Operators. 2015.
  25. FAA. Fatigue Risk Management Systems for Aviation Safety. FAA AC 120-103A. 2013.