DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study of Base DRAG Prediction With Chamber Pressure at Super-Sonic Flow

초음속 유동에서 챔버 압력에 따른 기저항력 변화 예측

  • Received : 2020.08.07
  • Accepted : 2020.10.20
  • Published : 2020.11.01

Abstract

The semi-empirical equation and commercial computational tool were used to predict the base drag of a guided missile with free-stream Mach numbers and chamber pressures, and the results were generally agree each other. Differences in flow characteristics and base drags were observed with over/under expansion conditions by the nozzle. Under the over-expansion condition, the base pressure decreased as the expansion fan was generated at upper region of the base, and base pressure decreased further with increasing free-stream Mach number as the expansion becomes strong. Under the under-expansion conditions, a shock wave was generated around the base by the influence of the nozzle flow, which increased the base pressure, and the effect increased as the chamber pressure increased. Under the same chamber pressure condition, as the free-stream Mach number increases, the characteristic that the base pressure decreases as the shock wave generated at the base moves downstream was observed.

반경험식과 상용 전산해석도구를 이용하여 비행 속도 및 챔버 압력에 따른 유도무기의 기저항력을 예측하였으며, 두 해석 결과는 대체적으로 일치함을 보였다. 노즐에 의한 분사 제트의 과대/과소 팽창에 따라 기저부의 유동 특성과 기저항력의 차이가 관찰되었다. 과대팽창 조건에서는 기저부 상단에 팽창파가 발생되면서 기저부의 압력이 감소하였으며, 외부 자유류의 마하수가 증가함에 따라 팽창파의 강도가 강해지면서 기저부 압력 더욱 감소하였다. 과소 팽창 조건에서는 노즐 후류의 영향으로 기저부 주위에 충격파가 발생하고 이로 인해 기저부 압력이 증가하였으며, 챔버의 압력이 증가할수록 그 영향이 크게 나타났다. 동일 챔버 압력 조건에서는 자유류 마하수가 증가함에 따라 기저부에서 생성되는 충격파가 하류로 이동하면서 기저 압력이 감소하는 특성이 관찰되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Brazzel, C. E. and Henderson, J. H., "An Empirical Technique for Estimating Power-on Base Drag of Bodies-of-Revolution with a Single Jet Exhaust," Conference on the Fluid Dynamic Aspects of Ballistics, NATO-AGARD, CP.10, 1966, pp. 241-261.
  2. Craft, J. C. and Brazzel, C. E., "An Experimental Investigation of Base Pressure on a Body of Revolution at High Thrust Levels and Free Stream Mach Numbers of 1.5 to 2.87," U.S. Army Missile command Report No. RD-TM-70-6, 1970.
  3. Moore, F. G. and Moore, L. Y., "Improvements to Power-on Base Pressure Prediction for the Aeroprediction Code," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2010, pp. 101-112. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.45602
  4. Lamb, J. P. and Oberkampf, W. L., "Review and development of base pressure and base heating correlations in supersonic flow," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 32, No. 1, 1995, pp. 8-23. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.26569
  5. Kumar, V. S., "Estimation of Base Drag on Supersonic Cruise Missile," International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2016, pp. 62-665.
  6. Paciorri, R., Sabetta, F. and Bonfiglioli, A., "Turbulence Modeling of Base Drag on Launcher in Subsonic Flight," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 51, No. 5, 2014, pp. 1673-1680. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A32757
  7. Bakker, P., Bannink, W. J., Servel, P. and Reijasse, P., "CFD validation for base flows with and without plume interaction," 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2002, p. 438
  8. Meiss, J-H. and Schroder, W., "Large-Eddy Simulation of a Generic Space Vehicle," RESPACE - Key Technologies for Reusable Space Systems, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 40-56.
  9. Jin, Y. and Friedrich, R., "Large Eddy Simulation of Nozzle Jet-External Flow Interaction," RESPACE-Key Technologies for Reusable Space Systems, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 57-81.
  10. Lopez-Reig, J., Velazquez, A. and Rodriquez, M., "Quasi-analytical prediction of base flow-plume interaction," Aerothermodynamics for space vehicles, Vol. 426, 1999, p. 599.
  11. Paciorri, R., Sabetta, F., Valenza, F., Fauci, R., Passaro, A. and Baccarella, D., "Base-Pressure Experimental Investigation on a Space Launcher in Subsonic Regime," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2013, pp. 572-578. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A32283
  12. Bannink, W., Houtman, E. and Bakker, P., "Base flow/underexpanded exhaust plume interaction in a supersonic external flow," In 8th AIAA international space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies conference, Vol. 1998, p. 1598.
  13. Ahn, H. K., Hong, S. K., Lee, B. J. and Ahn, C. S., "Uncertainties In Base Drag Prediction of A Supersonic Missile," The Korean Society for Computational Fluids Engineering Fall Conference, 2004, pp. 47-51.
  14. Lee, B. J., "Base Drag Prediction of a Supersonic Missile Using CFD," Journal of Korean Society for Computational Fluids Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2006, pp. 59-63.
  15. Lee, J. H. and Hur, K. H., "Plume-on base flows of a cylindrical afterbody with tails using RANS and DES models," The 2016 structures congress, Jeju Island, 2016, Korea.
  16. Hur, K. H. and Byon. W. S., "Jet Effect on Afterbody Drag," The Korean Society for Computational Fluids Engineering Fall Conference, 2000, pp. 170-175.
  17. Kang, K. T., Kim, M. G., Seon, C., Lee, G. S. and Hong, S. G., "Investigation of Base Pressure of Supersonic Body+Tail Configuration Missile," The Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences Fall Conference, 2007, pp. 165-168.
  18. Choi, J. H., Lee, E. S. and Lee, K. S., "Numerical Simulation of the Power-on Base Drag of a Missile Body," Journal of Computational Fluids Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2015, pp. 16-22. https://doi.org/10.6112/kscfe.2015.20.2.016
  19. Kang, E. J. and Kim, Y. H., "Prediction of Base Drag With Fin Deflections," The Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences Spring Conference, 2016, pp. 28-29.
  20. Lamb, J. P. and Oberkampf, W. L., "Review and development of base pressure and base heating correlations in supersonic flow," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 32, No. 1, 1995, pp. 8-23. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.26569