Journal of Industrial Convergence (산업융합연구)

DAEHAN Society of Industrial Management (대한산업경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mediating effect of appropriation between non-technical innovation and business performance

비 기술혁신과 기업의 경영성과 사이에서 전유성의 매개효과

  • Choi, Jin (Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Management, Namseoul University)
  • 최진 (남서울대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • Received : 2020.09.20
  • Accepted : 2020.10.20
  • Published : 2020.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, in addition to non-technical innovation activities such as organizational innovation and marketing innovation, the purpose of this study was to verify through empirical analysis what mechanism appropriation affects the business performance of a company. Data were collected from the 2018 Korean Business Innovation Survey: Manufacturing Sector and used as analysis data. As a result of the analysis, it was verified through empirical analysis that non-technical innovation improves management performance, appropriability is affected by non-technical innovation, and acts as a mediating factor between management performance. Through this empirical analysis, it was derived that considering appropriation along with non-technical innovation on the recently studied non-technical innovation can be a meaningful study, and since securing such appropriation is an important factor in determining the business performance of a company. Companies need insight into the strategic use of technology protection measures to secure appropriation. As a limitation, it was limited to studies that verify that it has a mediating effect of non-technical innovation and appropriation, and it is considered that it is possible to develop a study that affects the management performance of a company through more various verification methods for future studies.

본 연구에서는 조직혁신과 마케팅혁신 같은 비 기술혁신 활동 이외에 전유성은 어떠한 메커니즘을 가지고 기업의 경영성과에 영향을 미치는지에 대해서 실증분석을 통해 검증하고자 하였다. 이에 과학기술정책연구원(STEPI)에서 실시한 '2018년 한국기업혁신조사: 제조업부분'으로부터 자료를 수집하여 분석 데이터로 활용하였고 회귀분석을 통해 가설을 검증한 결과 비 기술혁신은 경영성과를 향상시키고, 전유성은 비 기술혁신에 영향을 받으며, 경영성과 사이에 매개 요인으로 작용함을 실증분석을 통해 검증하였다. 이러한 것을 통해 최근 연구되고 있는 비 기술혁신에 대하여 비 기술혁신과 함께 전유성을 고려하는 것이 의미 있는 연구가 될 수 있음을 도출하였고, 실무적 시사점으로는 전유성의 확보가 기업의 경영성과를 결정하는 중요한 요인이기에 기업에서는 전유성 확보를 위한 전략적 통찰이 필요하다. 한계점으로는 비 기술혁신과 전유성의 매개효과를 가지는 것을 검증하는 연구로 제한하였으며, 추후 연구에는 보다 다양한 검증 방법을 통해 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 연구로 발전해 나가는 것도 가능할 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Clausen, T., Pohjola, M., Sapprasert, K. & Verspagen, B. (2012). Innovation strategies as a source of persistent innovation, Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(3), 553-585. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtr051
  2. Conner K. R. & Prahalad C. K. (1996). A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm, Knowledge versus Opportunism. Organization Science, 7(5), 477-501. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.5.477
  3. Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M. & Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative Effects of Innovation Types and Organizational Performance, A Longitudinal Study of Service Organizations, Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650-675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x
  4. Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and Learning, The Two Faces of R&D, The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569-596. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233763
  5. Utterback, J, M. & Abernathy, W. J. (1975), A Dynamic Model of Process and Product Innovation, Management Science, 3(6), 639-656.
  6. OECD. (2009). Innovation in Firms - A Microeconomic Perspective, Paris, OECD Publishing.
  7. Ram, S. and Jagdish N. Sheth(1990), Hurdling the Barriers to Technological Innovation, R&D Strategist, 12(Fall), 4-14.
  8. Shergill, G. S. & Nargundkar, R. (2005). Market Orientation, Marketing Innovation as Performance Drivers, Extending the Paradigm, Journal of Global Marketing, 19(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1300/J042v19n01_03
  9. Malerba, F. & Orsenigo, L. (1996). Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific, Research Policy, 25(3), 451-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00840-3
  10. Leiponen, A. & Byma, J. (2009). If you cannot block, you better run: Small firms, cooperative innovation, and appropriation strategies, Research Policy, 38(9), 1478-1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.003
  11. Rhee, J., T. Park & D. Lee. (2010). Drivers of Innovativeness and Performance for Innovative SMEs in South Korea: Mediation of Learning Orientation, Technovation, 30(1), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.008
  12. H. S. Kim & S. J. Bae. (2016). Analysis of the relationship between technological and non-technical innovation and performance improvement. Industrial Economic Research, 29,1877-1899.
  13. Van de Ven. (1986). Central Problems in the Management of Innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590-607. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590
  14. Nelson, R. R. & Sidney, G. (1982). Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
  15. Lam, A. (2005). Organizational Innovation. Chapter 5 in J. Fagerberg. D. Mowery and R. R. Nelson (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  16. Lam, A. (2005). Organizational Innovation. Chapter 5 in J. Fagerberg. D. Mowery and R. R. Nelson (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  17. OCED. (2005). The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Oslo Manual : Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. 3rd ed. OECD Publishing.
  18. Shergill, G. S. & Nargundkar, R. (2005). Market Orientation, Marketing Innovation as Performance Drivers, Extending the Paradigm, Journal of Global Marketing, 19(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1300/J042v19n01_03
  19. Naidoo, V. (2010). Firm Survival Through a Crisis, The Influence of Market Orientation, Marketing Innovation and Business Strategy, Industrial Marketing Management, 39(8), 1311-1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.02.005
  20. Levitt, T. (1960). Marketing Myopia, Harvard Business Review, 38, 24-47.
  21. Schmidt. T. & Rammer. C. (2007). Non-technological and Technological Innovation: Strange Bedfellows?. ZEW Discussion Papers 07-052. ZEW - Zentrum fur Europaische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH/Center for European Economic Research.
  22. Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., Gilbert, R. & Griliches, Z. (1987). Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Economic Activity, 1987(3), 783-831.
  23. Breschi, S., Malerba, F. & Orsenigo, L. (2000). Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation. The Economic Journal, 110(463), 388-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00530
  24. Katz, R. (2003). Managing technological innovation in business organizations. London: Pergamon Press.
  25. Gallie, E. P. & Legros, D. (2012). French firms' strategies for protecting their intellectual property, Research Policy, 41(4), 780-794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.008
  26. Breschi, S., Malerba, F. & Orsenigo, L. (2000). Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation. The Economic Journal, 110(463), 388-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00530
  27. Shergill, G. S. & Nargundkar, R. (2005). Market Orientation, Marketing Innovation as Performance Drivers. Extending the Paradigm, Journal of Global Marketing, 19(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1300/J042v19n01_03
  28. Wind, Y. J. (2005). Marketing as an engine of business growth: a cross-functional perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(7), 863-873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.01.002
  29. Reed, R. & DeFillippi, R. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88-102. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4308277
  30. Teece, D. J. (1986), Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
  31. S. H. Oh & S. Y. Han. (2013). Analysis of Product Innovation Mechanism for Improving Financial Performance of Companies. Journal of Technology Innovation Society, 16(4), 1006-1031.