Journal of Bio-Environment Control (생물환경조절학회지)

The Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control (한국생물환경조절학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Changes of Growth and Yield by using Rootstocks in Tomato

대목사용에 따른 토마토의 생육 및 수량 변화

  • Lee, Hyewon (Department of Vegetable crops, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries) ;
  • Hong, Kue Hyon (Department of Vegetable crops, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries) ;
  • Kwon, Deok Ho (Department of Vegetable crops, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries) ;
  • Cho, Myeong Cheoul (Vegetable Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science) ;
  • Lee, Jun Gu (Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Hwang, Indeok (R&D Center, Bunongseed Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Ahn, Yul Kyun (Department of Vegetable crops, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries)
  • 이혜원 (국립한국농수산대학 채소학과) ;
  • 홍규현 (국립한국농수산대학 채소학과) ;
  • 권덕호 (국립한국농수산대학 채소학과) ;
  • 조명철 (국립원예특작과학원 채소과) ;
  • 이준구 (전북대학교 농업생명과학대학 원예학과) ;
  • 황인덕 (부농종묘 육종연구소) ;
  • 안율균 (국립한국농수산대학 채소학과)
  • Received : 2020.08.28
  • Accepted : 2020.10.17
  • Published : 2020.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research was conducted to examine the changes in yield and difference in growth, using rootstocks in tomatoes as the growth indicators. Seedlings of tomato 'Gama', were used as scion and non-grafted control, while 4 different grafted tomatoes 'Powerguard', 'T1', 'L1', and 'B.blocking' were used as rootstocks. The non-grafted and grafted plants were grown in hydroponics for long-duration cultivation under plastic greenhouse conditions. The total yield of grafted tomato 'Powerguard' and non-grafted tomato 'Gama' were 8,428 g and 7,645 g, respectively. The flowering position of grafted plants 'B.blocking' and non-grafted plants at the latter period were 17.58 cm and 14.92 cm, respectively. The results showed that the yield and the balance of the plant were improved until the end of the harvest by grafting. The difference in yield between non-grafted and grafted tomatoes was evident in the 19th cluster, 236 days after planting. Therefore using rootstocks could be advantageous for long-duration cultivation in tomatoes.

수경재배 시설 내에서 토마토를 재배할 때 대목사용에 따른 수확 시기별 수확량 변화와 생육지표를 활용한 생육차이를 살펴보고자 본 실험을 수행하였다. '감마'를 접수로 '파워가드', 'T1', 'L1', 'B.blocking'을 대목으로 접목한 토마토 접목묘 4종류와 접목하지 않은 '감마'를 실생묘로 실험에 사용하였다. 재배는 장기재배를 하는 토마토 수경재배 비닐하우스에서 재배되었다. 토마토의 총 수확량을 조사한 결과 대목을 사용하여 접목한 토마토 '파워가드'의 수확량과 접목하지 않은 토마토의 수확량은 각각 8,428g과 7,645g으로 나타났다. 생육 후기 접목한 토마토 'B.blocking'과 실생 토마토의 개화위치는 각각 17.58cm와 14.92cm였다. 이같은 결과는 토마토에 있어서 대목을 사용하는 것이 수확량이 높고 수확 후기까지 식물체가 균형있는 생장을 하는 것으로 볼 수 있다. 접목묘와 실생묘의 수확량 차이는 정식 236일 째인 19화방부터 크게 나타나기 시작하였다. 토마토 장기재배를 할 경우에는 대목을 사용하는 것이 높은 수량을 얻을 수 있는 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, S.R., K.E. Cockshull, and C.R.J. Cave. 2001. Effect of temperature on the growth and development of tomato fruits. Annals of Botany 88:869-877. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2001.1524
  2. Khah, E.M., E. Kakava, A. Mavromatis, D. Chachalis, and C. Goulas. 2006. Effect of grafting on growth and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in greenhouse and open-field. Journal of Applied Horticulture 8:3-7. https://doi.org/10.37855/jah.2006.v08i01.01
  3. Kim, S.E., S.Y Sim, S.D. Lee, and Y.S. Kim. 2010. Appropriate root-zone temperature control in perlite bag culture of tomato during winter season. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol 28:783-789 (in Korean).
  4. Kim, S.E., M.Y. Lee, and Y.S. Kim. 2013. Characterization of photosynthetic rates by tomato leaf position. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol 31:146-152 (in Korean).
  5. Kim, S.E., M.Y. Lee, M.H. Lee, S.Y. Sim, and Y.S. Kim. 2014 Optimal Management of tomato leaf pruning in rockwool culture. Hort. Environ. Biotechnol 55:445-454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-014-0049-y
  6. Kubota, C., M.A. McClure, N. Kokalis-Burelle, M.G. Bausher, and E.N. Rosskopf. 2008. Vegetable grafting: History, use and current technology status in North America. HortScience 43:1664-1669. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.43.6.1664
  7. Lee, J.M. 1994. Cultivation of grafted vegetables I. current status, grafting methods, and benefits. HortScience 29:235-239. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.29.4.235
  8. Lee, J.M., and M. ODA. 2003. Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental crops. Horticultural Reviews 28:61-124.
  9. Lee, J.M., C. Kubota, S.J. Tsao, Z. Bie, P. Hoyos Echevarria, L. Morra, and M.Oda. 2010. Current status of vegetable grafting: Diffusion, grafting techniques, automation. Scientia Horticulturae 127:93-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.08.003
  10. Marsic, N.K. and J. Osvald. 2004. The influence of grafting on yield of two tomato cultivars(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) grown in a plastic house. Acta agriculturae slovenica 83:243-249.
  11. McManus, B. 2020, 31 Advantages & disadvantages of hydrop onics. Available via https://smallscalegardener.com/advantages-disadvantages-hydroponics. Accessed 26 September 2020
  12. Rural Development Administration (RDA). 2019. TOMATO. Rural Development Administration, Jeonju, Korea (in Korean).
  13. Saito, T., T. Ariizumi, Y. Okabe, E. Asamizu, K. Hiwasa-Tanase, N. Fukuda, T. Miizoguchi, Y. Yamazaki, K. Aoki, and H. Ezura. 2011. TOMATOMA: A novel tomato mutant database distributing micro-tom mutant collections. Plant Cell Physiol. 52:283-296. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcr004
  14. Singh, H., P. Kumar, S. Chaudhari, and M. Edelstein. 2017. Tomato grafting: A global perspective. HortScience. 52:1328-1336. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI11996-17
  15. Stradiot, P. and P. Battistel. 2003. Improved plant management with localised crop heating and advice on distance in the mediterranean climate. Acta Hort. 614:461-467. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.614.69
  16. Turhan, A., N. Ozmen, M.S. Serbeci, and V. Seniz. 2011. Effects of grafting on different rootstocks on tomato fruit yield and quality. Hort. Sci. 38:142-149. https://doi.org/10.17221/51/2011-hortsci
  17. White, R.A.J. 1963. Grafted greenhouse tomatoes give heavier crops. N. Z. J. Agr. Res. 106:247-248.