DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Robustness Design For Tall Timber Buildings

  • Published : 2020.09.01

Abstract

With the ever-increasing height of timber buildings, the complexity of timber as a structural material gives rise to behaviors not previously studied by engineers. An urgent call is needed regarding their performance in damage scenarios: activating alternative load paths in tall timber buildings is not the same as in tall buildings made with steel and concrete. In this paper we propose a robustness framework covering all building materials, whose application in timber may lead to new conceptual designs for the next generation of tall timber buildings. Qualitatively, the importance of building scale and the distinction between localized and systematic exposures are discussed, and how existing supertall structures can be an example for future generations of tall timber buildings. Quantitatively, the robustness index is introduced alongside a method to calculate the performance of a given building regarding robustness, in order to find the most cost-effective structural solutions for improved robustness. A three-level application recommendation is made, depending on the importance of the building in question. Primarily, the paper highlights the importance of conceptual design to achieve structural robustness and encourages the practicing engineering community to use the proposed framework to quantitatively come up with the new generation of tall timber buildings.

Keywords

References

  1. Abrahamsen, R., 2018. Mjostarnet - 18 storey timber building completed. Garmisch-Partenkirchen, 24. Internationales Holzbau-Forum (IHF) 2018.
  2. Adam, J. M., Parisi, F., Sagaseta, J. & Lu, X., 2018. Research and practice on progressive collapse and robustness of building structures in the 21st century. Engineering Structures, Volume 173, pp. 122-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.082
  3. Agarwal, J. et al., 2011. Robustness of Structures: Lessons from Failures. Structural Engineering International, Issue 1, pp. 105-111.
  4. Ali, M. M. & Moon, K. S., 2007. Structural Developments in Tall Buildings: Current Trends and Future Prospects. Architectural Science Review, 50(3), pp. 205-223. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2007.5027
  5. Arup, 2011. Review of international research on structural robustness and disproportionate collapse, London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
  6. Baker, J. W., Schubert, M. & Faber, M. H., 2007. On the Assessment of Robustness. Structural Safety, Issue 30, pp. 253-267.
  7. Bao, L. et al., 2015. The New Structural Design Process of Supertall Buildings in China. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, 4(3), pp. 219-226. https://doi.org/10.21022/IJHRB.2015.4.3.219
  8. Bussell, M. N. & Jones, A. E. K., 2010. Robustness and the relevance of Ronan Point today. The Structural Engineer, 7 December, pp. 20-25.
  9. Canisius, G., 2011. Structural Robustness Design For Practicing Engineers. s.l.:COST TU0601.
  10. Chung, K. & Sunu, W., 2015. Outrigger Systems for Tall Buildings in Korea. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, 4(3), pp. 209-2017. https://doi.org/10.21022/IJHRB.2015.4.3.209
  11. Huber, J., Ekevad, M., Girhammar, U. A. & Berg, S., 2019. Structural Robustness and Timber Buildings - A Review. Wood Material Science & Engineering, 14(2), pp. 107-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2018.1446052
  12. Jianlong, Z., Lianjin, B. & Peng, Q., 2014. Study on Structural Efficiency of Super-Tall Buildings. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, 3(3), pp. 185-190. https://doi.org/10.21022/IJHRB.2014.3.3.185
  13. Koo, K., 2013. A study on historical tall wood buildings in Toronto and Vancouver, Vancouver: Canadian Forest Service.
  14. Marelli, S., Wicaksono, D. & Sudret, B., 2019. The UQLab project: steps towards a global uncertainty quantification community. Seoul, 13th International Conference on Applicaitons of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP13.
  15. Mpidi Bita, H., Huber, J., Voulpiotis, K. & Tannert, T., 2019. Survey of contemporary practices for disproportionate collapse prevention. Engineering Structures, Volume 199.
  16. Peng, L., Cheng, Y. & Zhu, Y.-S., 2016. The structural design of "China Zun" Tower, Beijing. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, 5(3), pp. 213-220. https://doi.org/10.21022/IJHRB.2016.5.3.213
  17. Peng, L. et al., 2012. The Structural Design of Tianjin Goldin Finance 117 Tower. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, 1(4), pp. 271-281. https://doi.org/10.21022/IJHRB.2012.1.4.271
  18. Ramage, M. et al., 2017. Super Tall Timber: design research for the next generation of natural structure. The Journal of Architecture, 22(1), pp. 104-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2016.1276094
  19. Risk Management Solutions, 2008. The 1998 Ice Storm: 10-Year Retrospective, Newark: Risk Management Solutions Inc.
  20. Sanner, J. et al., 2017. River Beech Tower: A Tall Timber Experiment. CTBUH Journal, 2017(II).
  21. Sorensen, J. D., 2011. Framework for robustness assessment of timber structures. Engineering Structures, Volume 33, pp. 3087-3092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.025
  22. Starossek, U. & Haberland, M., 2010. Disproportionate Collapse: Terminology and Procedures. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Volume 24, pp. 519-528. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000138
  23. Sudret, B., 2007. Uncertainty propagation and sensitivity analysis in mechanical models, Clermont-Ferrand: Universite Blaise Pascal - Clermont II.
  24. von Klemperer, J., 2018. Lotte World Tower: Seoul's First Supertall. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, 2018(I), pp. 12-19.
  25. Voulpiotis, K., Kohler, J., Jockwer, R. & Frangi, A., 2019. Robustness in Tall Timber Buildings - An Improved Framework. Tacoma, International Network for Research in Timber Engineering (INTER).
  26. Winter, S. & Kreuzinger, H., 2008. The Bad Reichenhall Ice Arena collapse and the necessary consequences for wide span timber structures. Miyazaki, World Conference in Timber Engineering (WCTE) 2008.