Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Extrusion enhances apparent metabolizable energy, ileal protein and amino acid digestibility of palm kernel cake in broilers

  • Faridah, Hanim Shakirin (Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia) ;
  • Goh, Yong Meng (Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia) ;
  • Noordin, Mohamed Mustapha (Department of Veterinary Pathology & Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia) ;
  • Liang, Juan Boo (Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Food Security, Universiti Putra Malaysia)
  • Received : 2019.12.21
  • Accepted : 2020.03.03
  • Published : 2020.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: This study consisted of two stages; the first was to determine the effect of extrusion and sieving treatments on the chemical properties of palm kernel cake (PKC), and accordingly, a follow-up experiment (second stage) was conducted to determine and compare the apparent metabolizable energy (AME), and protein and amino acid digestibility of extruded and sieved PKC. Methods: Two physical treatments, namely extrusion (using temperature profiles of 90℃/100℃/100℃, 90℃/100℃/110℃, and 90℃/100℃/120℃) and sieving (to 8 particles sizes ranging from >8.00 to 0.15 mm) were carried out to determine their effects on chemical properties, primarily crude protein (CP) and fiber contents of PKC. Based on the results from the above study, PKC that extruded with temperature profile 90/100/110℃ and of sieved size between 1.5 to 0.15 mm (which made up of near 60% of total samples) were used to determine treatments effect on AME and CP and amino acid digestibility. The second stage experiment was conducted using 64 male Cobb 500 chickens randomly assigned to 16 cages (4 cages [or replicates] per treatment) to the following four dietary groups: i) basal (control) diet, ii) basal diet containing 20% untreated PKC, iii) basal diet containing 20% extruded PKC (EPKC), and iv) basal diet containing 20% sieved PKC (SPKC). Results: Extrusion and sieving had no effect on CP and ash contents of PKC, however, both treatments reduced (p<0.05) crude fiber by 21% and 19%, respectively. Overall, extrusion and sieving reduced content of most of the amino acids except for aspartate, glutamate, alanine and lysine which increased, while serine, cysteine and tryptophan remained unchanged. Extrusion resulted in 6% increase (p<0.05) in AME and enhanced CP digestibility (p<0.05) by 32%, as compared to the untreated PKC while sieving had no effect on AME but improved CP digestibility by 39% which was not significantly different from that by extrusion. Conclusion: Extrusion is more effective than sieving and serves as a practical method to enhance AME and digestibility of CP and several amino acids in broiler chickens.

Keywords

References

  1. Saenphoom P, Liang JB, Ho YW, Loh TC, Rosfarizan M. Effects of enzyme treated palm kernel expeller on metabolizable energy, growth performance, villus height and digesta viscosity in broiler chickens. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2013; 26:537-44. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12463
  2. Sharmila A, Alimon AR, Azhar K, Noor HM, Samsudin AA. Improving nutritional values of Palm Kernel Cake (PKC) as poultry feeds: a review. Malays J Anim Sci 2014;17:1-18.
  3. Rosenfelder P, Eklund M, Mosenthin R. Nutritive value of wheat and wheat by-products in pig nutrition: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2013;185:107-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.07.011
  4. Amerah AM, Ravindran V, Lentle RG, Thomas DG. Feed particle size: Implications on the digestion and performance of poultry. Worlds Poult Sci J 2007;63:439-55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933907001560
  5. Brenes A, Viveros A, Centeno C, Arija I, Marzo F. Nutritional value of raw and extruded chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) for growing chickens. Spanish J Agric Res 2008;6:537-45. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2008064-348
  6. Yahaghi M, Liang JB, Balcells J, et al. Extrusion of sorghum starch enhances ruminal and intestinal digestibility, rumen microbial yield and growth in lambs fed on high-concentrate diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2014;189:30-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.12.009
  7. Ahmed A, Zulkifli I, Farjam AS, Abdullah N, Liang JB. Extrusion enhances metabolizable energy and ileal amino acids digestibility of canola meal for broiler chickens. Ital J Anim Sci 2014;13:3032. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2014.3032
  8. Allen KE, Carpenter CE, Walsh MK. Influence of protein level and starch type on an extrusion-expanded whey product. Int J Food Sci Technol 2007;42:953-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01316.x
  9. Navidshad B, Liang JB, Jahromi MF, Akhlaghi A, Abdullah N. Effects of enzymatic treatment and shell content of palm kernel expeller meal on performance, nutrient digestibility, and ileal bacterial population in broiler chickens. J Appl Poult Res 2016;25:474-82. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfw029
  10. Kupski L, Cipolatti E, Rocha Md, Oliveira MdS, Souza-Soares LdA, Badiale-Furlong E. Solid-state fermentation for the enrichment and extraction of proteins and antioxidant compounds in rice bran by Rhizopus oryzae. Braz Arch Biol Technol 2012;55:937-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132012000600018
  11. Adebiyi AP, Adebiyi AO, Ogawa T, Muramoto K. Purification and characterisation of antioxidative peptides from unfractionated rice bran protein hydrolysates. Int J Food Sci Technol 2008;43:35-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01379.x
  12. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem1951;193: 265-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6
  13. AOAC. Official methods of analyses, 18th edition. Washington, DC, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 2005.
  14. Robertson JA, de Monredon FD, Dysseler P, Guillon F, Amado R, Thibault J-F. Hydration properties of dietary fibre and resistant starch: a European collaborative study. LWT-Food Sci Technol 2000;33:72-9. https://doi.org/10.1006/fstl.1999.0595
  15. NRC. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th revised edition. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 1994.
  16. Ravindran V, Hew LI, Ravindran G, Bryden WL. Apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids in dietary ingredients for broiler chickens. Anim Sci 2005;81:85-97. https://doi.org/10.1079/ASC42240085
  17. Strydom DJ, Cohen SA. Comparison of amino acid analyses by phenylisothiocyanate and 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate precolumn derivatization. Anal Biochem 1994;222:19-28. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1994.1448
  18. Short FJ, Gorton P, Wiseman J, Boorman KN. Determination of titanium dioxide added as an inert marker in chicken digestibility studies. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1996;59:215-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00916-7
  19. Driver JP, Atencio A, Edwards Jr HM, Pesti GM. Improvements in nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy of peanut meal in response to phytase supplementation. Poult Sci 2006;85:96-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.1.96
  20. Nalle CL, Ravindran V, Ravindran G. Nutritional value of peas (Pisum sativum L.) for broilers: apparent metabolisable energy, apparent ileal amino acid digestibility and production performance. Anim Prod Sci 2011;51:150-5. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10100
  21. Kadim IT, Moughan PJ. Ileal amino acid digestibility assay for the growing meat chicken-effect of the imposition of a fasting period and the nature of the test diet. Br Poult Sci 1997; 38:285-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669708417988
  22. Abdollahi MR, Hosking B, Ravindran V. Nutrient analysis, metabolisable energy and ileal amino acid digestibility of palm kernel meal for broilers. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2015;206: 119-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.05.019
  23. Nikmaram N, Kamani MH, Ghalavand R. The effects of extrusion cooking on antinutritional factors, chemical propertiesand contaminating microorganisms of food. Int J Farm Alli Sci 2015;4:352-4.
  24. Bastos DM, Monaro E, Siguemoto E, Sefora M. Maillard reaction products in processed food: pros and cons. In: Valdez B, editor. Food industrial processes-methods and equipment. Rijeka, Croatia: IntechOpen; 2012. p. 281-300.
  25. Lue S, Hsieh F, Huff HE. Effects on expansion properties, starch gelatinization, and dietary fiber content. Cereal Chem 1991; 68:227-34.
  26. Chen WL, Tang SGH, Jahromi MF, et al. Metagenomics analysis reveals significant modulation of cecal microbiota of broilers fed palm kernel expeller diets. Poult Sci 2019;98:56-68. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey366
  27. Repo-Carrasco-Valencia RA-M, Serna LA. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa, Willd.) as a source of dietary fiber and other functional components. Food Sci Technol 2011;31:225-30. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612011000100035
  28. Esposito F, Arlotti G, Bonifati AM, Napolitano A, Vitale D, Fogliano V. Antioxidant activity and dietary fibre in durum wheat bran by-products. Food Res Int 2005;38:1167-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2005.05.002
  29. Raghavendra SN, Rastogi NK, Raghavarao KSMS, Tharanathan RN. Dietary fiber from coconut residue: effects of different treatments and particle size on the hydration properties. Eur Food Res Technol 2004;218:563-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-004-0889-2
  30. Camire ME, Flint SI. Thermal processing effects on dietary fiber composition and hydration capacity in corn meal, oat meal, and potato peels. Cereal Chem 1991;68:645-7.
  31. Saw HY, Janaun J, Subbarao D. Hydration properties of palm kernel cake. J Food Engineering 2008;89:227-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.04.027
  32. Saw HY, Janaun J, Kumaresan S, Chu CM. Characterization of the physical properties of palm kernel cake. Int J Food Prop 2012;15:536-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2010.492543
  33. Goni I, Martin-Carron N. In vitro fermentation and hydration properties of commercial dietary fiber-rich supplements. Nutr Res 1998;18:1077-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5317(98) 00090-6
  34. Ayasan T, Ulger I, Kaliber M, et al. Comparison of in vitro gas production, nutritive value, metabolizable energy and organic matter digestibility of some chickpea varieties. Iranian J Appl Anim Sci 2018; 8:131-6.
  35. Ergul S, Ayasan T, Ulger I, et al. Determination of the nutritive value of some bread wheat varieties developed in East Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute using in vitro gas production technique. Turkish Agric Nat Sci 2017;4:441-6.
  36. Muangkeow N, Chinajariyawong C. Determination of true amino acid digestibility and metabolizable energy in fermented palm kernel meal with Aspergillus wentii TISTR 3075 for chickens. Walailak J Sci Technol 2009;6:231-41.
  37. Mardhati M, Wong HK, Noraini S. Growth performance and carcass quality of broilers fed with palm kernel meal-based rations. J Trop Agric Food Sci 2011;39:157-66.
  38. Ezieshi EV, Olomu JM. Nutritional evaluation of palm kernel meal types: 1. Proximate composition and metabolizable energy values. Afr J Biotechnol 2007;6:2484-6. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2007.000-2393
  39. Svihus B, Juvik E, Hetland H, Krogdahl A. Causes for improvement in nutritive value of broiler chicken diets with whole wheat instead of ground wheat. Br Poult Sci 2004;45:55-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660410001668860
  40. Kim EJ, Parsons CM, Srinivasan R, Singh V. Nutritional composition, nitrogen-corrected true metabolizable energy, and amino acid digestibilities of new corn distillers dried grains with solubles produced by new fractionation processes. Poult Sci 2010;89:44-51. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00196
  41. Randall KM, Drew MD. Fractionation of wheat distiller's dried grains and solubles using sieving increases digestible nutrient content in rainbow trout. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2010;159:138-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.05.011
  42. Goodband RD, Tokach MD, Nelssen JL. The effects of diet particle size on animal performance. MF-2050 Feed Manufacturing. Manhattan, KS, USA: Dept Grain Sci Ind, Kansas State University; 2002.
  43. Crevieu I, Carre B, Chagneau AM, Gueguen J, Melcion JP. Effect of particle size of pea (Pisum sativum L) flours on the digestion of their proteins in the digestive tract of broilers. J Sci Food Agric 1997;75:217-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199710)75:2<217::AID-JSFA867>3.0.CO;2-O
  44. Svihus B. Limitations to wheat starch digestion in growing broiler chickens: a brief review. Anim Prod Sci 2011;51:583-9. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN10271
  45. El-Khalek EA, Janssens GPJ. Effect of extrusion processing on starch gelatinisation and performance in poultry. Worlds Poult Sci J 2010;66:53-64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933 910000073
  46. Hejdysz M, Kaczmarek SA, Rutkowski A. Effect of extrusion on the nutritional value of peas for broiler chickens. Arch Anim Nutr 2016;70:364-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/174503 9X.2016.1206736
  47. Caprita R, Caprita A, Julean C. Biochemical aspects of non-starch polysaccharides. Scientific Papers Anim Sci Biotechnol 2010;43:368-74.

Cited by

  1. Effect of feeding fermented and non-fermented palm kernel cake on the performance of broiler chickens: a review vol.77, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2021.1910472
  2. Effect of the extrusion process on the amino acid components profile of the broilers diet vol.848, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/848/1/012056
  3. Effect of plant protein extrudates on hybrid meatballs - Changes in nutritional composition and sustainability vol.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2021.100081