Advances in concrete construction

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation of the effects on earthquake behavior and rough construction costs of the slab type in reinforced concrete buildings

  • Gursoy, Senol (Department of Civil Engineering, Karabuk University) ;
  • Uludag, Omer (Department of Civil Engineering, Karabuk University)
  • Received : 2019.09.08
  • Accepted : 2020.09.15
  • Published : 2020.10.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the architectural design process, the selection and configuration of the structural system significantly affect the earthquake behaviours of the reinforced concrete buildings. The main purpose of this study, the effects on the earthquake performances and the rough construction cost of the buildings of the slab type in reinforced concrete buildings are to examine comparatively for different local soil classes. The results obtained from this study have been determined that the building model having slabs with beams is safer compared to other types of slabs, especially when considering the vertical bearing structural elements (columns). It also shows that other types of slab, except for slab with beams, reduce the earthquake performances of reinforced concrete buildings, increase the displacement values, 1st natural vibration period values and the cost of rough construction. This matter reveals that slab type is quite important and the preference of beamed slabs in reinforced concrete buildings to be constructed in earthquake zones would be more appropriate in terms of safety and cost.

Keywords

References

  1. Adalier, K. and Aydingun, O. (2001), "Structural engineering aspects of the June 27, 1998 Adana-Ceyhan (Turkey) earthquake", Eng. Struct., 23(4), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00046-8.
  2. Arslan, M.H. and Korkmaz, H.H. (2007), "What is to be learned from damage and failure of reinforced concrete structures during recent earthquakes in Turkey?", Eng. Fail. Anal., 14(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.01.003.
  3. Celep, Z. and Kumbasar, N. (2018), Reinforced Concrete Structures, Zekai Celep Publications, Istanbul, Turkey. (in Turkish)
  4. Celep, Z., Erken, A., Taskin, B. and Ilki, A. (2011), "Failures of masonry and concrete buildings during the March 8, 2010 Kovancilar and Palu (Elazig) Earthquakes in Turkey", Eng. Fail. Anal., 18(3), 868-889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.11.001.
  5. Di Sarno, L., Yenidogan, C. and Erdik, M. (2013), "Field evidence and numerical investigation of the $M_w=7,1$ October 23 Van, Tabanli and the $M_w>5,7$ November Earthquakes of 2011", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 11(1), 313-346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9417-0.
  6. Dogangun, A. (2004), "Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the May 1, 2003 Bingol earthquake in Turkey", Eng. Struct., 26(6), 841-856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.02.005.
  7. Dogangun, A. (2018), Calculation and Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Birsen Publisher, Istanbul, Turkey. (in Turkish)
  8. Gursoy, S. (2014), "Comparative investigation of the costs and performances of torsional irregularity structures under seismic loading according to TEC", Comput. Concrete, 14(4), 405-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/cac.2014.14.4.405.
  9. Gursoy, S. and Dogan, S.O. (2020), "The effect of slab gaps position and size in reinforced concrete buildings on earthquake behavior and rough construction cost", Duzce Universitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 8, 1407-1422. (in Turkish) https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.658286
  10. Gursoy, S., Oz, R. and Bas, S. (2015), "Investigation of the effect of weak-story on earthquake behavior and rough construction costs of RC buildings", Comput. Concrete, 16(1), 141-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/cac.2015.16.1.141.
  11. Inan, T., Korkmaz, K. and Cagatay, I.H. (2012), "An investigation on plan geometries of RC buildings: with or without projections in plan", Comput. Concrete, 9(6), 439-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/cac.2012.9.6.439.
  12. Inan, T., Korkmaz, K. and Cagatay, I.H. (2014), "The effect of architectural form on the earthquake behavior of symmetric RC frame systems", Comput. Concrete, 13(2), 271-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/cac.2014.13.2.271.
  13. Kaplan, H., Yilmaz, S., Binici, H., Yazar, E. and Cetinkaya, N. (2004), "May 1, 2003 Turkey-Bingol earthquake: damage in reinforced concrete structures", Eng. Fail. Anal., 11(3), 279-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2003.08.005.
  14. Ozturk, T. (2013), "Effect of openings in building slabs on the structural system behavior", Teknik Dergi, 24(116), 6233-6256.
  15. Sagliyan, S. and Yon, B. (2014), "Performance analysis of reinforced concrete slab buildings with continuous drop panel", Firat Univ. J. Eng., 26(1), 69-77. (in Turkish)
  16. Scawthorn, C. and Johnson, G.S. (2000), "Preliminary report Kocaeli (Izmit) earthquake of 17 August 1999", Eng. Struct., 22(7), 727-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00106-6.
  17. Sezen, H., Whittaker, A.S., Elwood, K.J. and Mosalam, K.M. (2003), "Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake, and seismic design and construction practise in Turkey", Eng. Struct., 25(1), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00121-9.
  18. Spence, R., Bommer, J., Del Re, D., Bird, J., Aydinoglu, N. and Tabuchi, S. (2003), "Comparing loss estimation with observed damage: a study of the 1999 Kocaeli Earthquake in Turkey", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 1(1), 83-113. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024857427292.
  19. Sta4-CAD (2014), Structural Analysis for Computer Aided Design, Ver.13.1.
  20. TEC (2007), Turkish Earthquake Resistant Design Code, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement Government of Republic of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.
  21. Terzi, M. and Elci, H. (2006), "The influences of the slab discontinuities on the internal forces, at frame type reinforced concrete structures", Pamukkale Univ., J. Eng. Sci., 12(3), 341-349. (in Turkish)
  22. Terzi, M. and Elci, H. (2009), "The effect A2 type of irregularity in the shear wall-framed reinforced concrete structures to affect cross-section", J. Balikkesir Univ. Inst. Sci. Technol., 11(1):83-94. (in Turkish)
  23. TS500 (2000), Requirements for Design and Construction of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Turkish Standards Institute, Ankara, Turkey. (in Turkish)
  24. Ulucan, Z.C. and Yon, B. (2008), "Nonlinear earthquake response of A2 slab discontinuity irregularity structures using rigid and elastic diaphragm assumptions", Sci. Eng. J. Firat Univ., 20(2), 315-323. (in Turkish)
  25. Uludag, O. (2019), "Investigation of the effects on earthquake behaviour and rough construction costs of the slab type in reinforced concrete buildings", M.Sc. Thesis, Karabuk University, Karabuk. (in Turkish)
  26. Ural, A. (2013), "19th May 2011 Simav (Kutahya) earthquake and response of masonry Halil Aga Mosque", Earthq. Struct., 4(6), 671-683. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.6.671.
  27. Yon, B., Oncu, M.E. and Ulucan, Z.C. (2010), "Investigation of effect of slab opening location to the shear stress", Pamukkale Univ., J. Eng. Sci., 16(1), 45-51. (in Turkish)