Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

  • 제53권5호
  • /
  • Pages.371-380
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1975-8375(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-4521(eISSN)
대한예방의학회 (The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Socio-demographic Factors on the Decreasing Trend in the Sex Ratio at Birth in Korea, 1997-2017

  • Bae, Jisuk (Department of Preventive Medicine, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2020.06.16
  • 심사 : 2020.07.21
  • 발행 : 2020.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: This study investigated the effects of socio-demographic factors on the decreasing trend in the sex ratio at birth from 1997 to 2017 in Korea. Methods: Data from 10 349 602 live births registered with Statistics Korea from 1997 to 2017 were analyzed. The secondary sex ratio (SSR), defined as the ratio of male to female live births, during the study period (1997-1999 [phase I], 2000-2002 [phase II], 2003-2005 [phase III], 2006-2008 [phase IV], 2009-2011 [phase V], 2012-2014 [phase VI], and 2015-2017 [phase VII]) was calculated according to selected socio-demographic factors, such as parental age, education, occupation, and birth order. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals for a male birth after adjusting for potential confounders. Results: The SSR gradually decreased from 1.10 (in 1998-2000 and 2002) to 1.05 (in 2013-2016). While a decreasing trend in the SSR was not noted among first births, male-biased sex ratios were prominent among third and higher-order births, for which the highest SSR was 1.46 in 1998. Higher birth order was significantly associated with an excess of male births in phases I-VI (≥third vs. first, OR range, 1.03 to 1.35). Advanced maternal age was significantly associated with an excess of female births in phases II, III, and V (≥40 vs. 20-24 years, OR range, 0.92 to 0.95). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that advanced maternal age and reduction of the artificially-biased SSR among third and higher-order births may partially explain the decreasing trend in the SSR from 1997 to 2017 in Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Dubuc S, Sivia DS. Is sex ratio at birth an appropriate measure of prenatal sex selection? Findings of a theoretical model and its application to India. BMJ Glob Health 2018;3(4):e000675. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000675
  2. Hesketh T, Lu L, Xing ZW. The consequences of son preference and sex-selective abortion in China and other Asian countries. CMAJ 2011;183(12):1374-1377. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.101368
  3. Choi EJ, Hwang J. Transition of son preference: evidence from South Korea. Demography 2020;57(2):627-652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00863-x
  4. Statistics Korea. Annual report on live births and deaths statistics, 1997-2017 [cited 2020 Jun 2]. Available from: http://kosis.kr/publication/publicationThema.do (Korean).
  5. Chun H, Kim IH, Khang YH. Trends in sex ratio at birth according to parental social positions: results from vital statistics birth, 1981-2004 in Korea. J Prev Med Public Health 2009;42(2):143-150 (Korean). https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.2.143
  6. James WH. Evidence that mammalian sex ratios at birth are partially controlled by parental hormone levels around the time of conception. J Endocrinol 2008;198(1):3-15. https://doi.org/10.1677/JOE-07-0446
  7. James WH. The variations of human sex ratio at birth with time of conception within the cycle, coital rate around the time of conception, duration of time taken to achieve conception, and duration of gestation: a synthesis. J Theor Biol 2008;255(2): 199-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.07.016
  8. James WH. Hypotheses on the stability and variation of human sex ratios at birth. J Theor Biol 2012;310:183-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.06.038
  9. Martin JF. Length of the follicular phase, time of insemination, coital rate and the sex of offspring. Hum Reprod 1997;12(3): 611-616. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.3.611
  10. Weinberg CR, Baird DD, Wilcox AJ. The sex of the baby may be related to the length of the follicular phase in the conception cycle. Hum Reprod 1995;10(2):304-307. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135932
  11. Bae J, Kim S, Chen Z, Eisenberg ML, Buck Louis GM. Human semen quality and the secondary sex ratio. Asian J Androl 2017; 19(3):374-381. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.173445
  12. Chahnazarian A. Determinants of the sex ratio at birth: review of recent literature. Soc Biol 1988;35(3-4):214-235.
  13. Jacobsen R, Moller H, Mouritsen A. Natural variation in the human sex ratio. Hum Reprod 1999;14(12):3120-3125. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.12.3120
  14. Mathews TJ, Hamilton BE. Trend analysis of the sex ratio at birth in the United States. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2005;53(20):1-17.
  15. Almond D, Edlund L. Trivers-Willard at birth and one year: evidence from US natality data 1983-2001. Proc Biol Sci 2007; 274(1624):2491-2496.
  16. Biggar RJ, Wohlfahrt J, Westergaard T, Melbye M. Sex ratios, family size, and birth order. Am J Epidemiol 1999;150(9):957-962. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010104
  17. Jiang Q, Yu Q, Yang S, Sanchez-Barricarte JJ. Changes in sex ratio at birth in China: a decomposition by birth order. J Biosoc Sci 2017;49(6):826-841. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932016000547
  18. Davis DL, Webster P, Stainthorpe H, Chilton J, Jones L, Doi R. Declines in sex ratio at birth and fetal deaths in Japan, and in U.S. whites but not African Americans. Environ Health Perspect 2007;115(6):941-946. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9540
  19. Catalano RA. Sex ratios in the two Germanies: a test of the economic stress hypothesis. Hum Reprod 2003;18(9):1972-1975. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg370
  20. Catalano RA, Bruckner T. Economic antecedents of the Swedish sex ratio. Soc Sci Med 2005;60(3):537-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.008
  21. Kolk M, Schnettler S. Socioeconomic status and sex ratios at birth in Sweden: no evidence for a Trivers-Willard effect for a wide range of status indicators. Am J Hum Biol 2016;28(1):67-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.22756
  22. Grech V. A socio-economic hypothesis for lower birth sex ratios at racial, national and global levels. Early Hum Dev 2018; 116:81-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.11.008
  23. Lipatov M, Li S, Feldman MW. Economics, cultural transmission, and the dynamics of the sex ratio at birth in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105(49):19171-19176. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806747105
  24. Chung W, Gupta MD. The decline of son preference in South Korea: the roles of development and public policy. Popul Dev Rev 2007;33(4):757-783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2007.00196.x
  25. Korea Institute of Health and Social Affairs. A study of fertility changes in Korea: based on National Fertility and Family Health Survey (1974-2012). Sejong: Korea Institute of Health and Social Affairs; 2016, p. 158-203 (Korean).
  26. Korea Institute of Health and Social Affairs. The 2015 National Survey on Fertility and Family Health and Welfare. Sejong: Korea Institute of Health and Social Affairs; 2015, p. 99-178 (Korean).
  27. Lin TC. The decline of son preference and rise of gender indifference in Taiwan since 1990. Demogr Res 2009;20:377-402. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2009.20.16
  28. Trivers RL, Willard DE. Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 1973;179(4068):90-92. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.179.4068.90
  29. Bae J, Lynch CD, Kim S, Sundaram R, Sapra KJ, Buck Louis GM. Preconception stress and the secondary sex ratio in a population-based preconception cohort. Fertil Steril 2017;107(3): 714-722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.011
  30. Bae J, Kim S, Barr DB, Buck Louis GM. Maternal and paternal serum concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and the secondary sex ratio: a population-based preconception cohort study. Environ Res 2018;161:9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.047