한국공간구조학회논문집 (Journal of Korean Association for Spatial Structures)

  • 제20권3호
  • /
  • Pages.107-116
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1598-4095(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7401(eISSN)
한국공간구조학회 (Korean Association for Spatial Structures)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

TMD 설치 질량 변화에 따른 대공간 구조물과 고층건물의 변위 응답 특성

Displacement Response Properties of Spatial Structures and High-Rise Buildings According to the Change of TMD Mass

  • 투고 : 2020.08.10
  • 심사 : 2020.08.26
  • 발행 : 2020.09.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this paper, the displacement response to seismic loads was analyzed after installing TMD in spatial structures and high-rise buildings. In the case of a spatial structures, since it exhibits complex dynamic behavior under the influence of various vibration modes, it is not possible to effectively control the seismic response by installing only one TMD, unlike ordinary structures. Therefore, after installing eight TMDs in the structure, the correlation between displacement response and mass ratio was examined while changing the mass. The TMD must be designed to have the same frequency as the structure frequency so that the maximum response reduction effect can be exhibited. It can be confirmed that the most important variable is to select the optimal TMD mass in order to install the TMD on the structure and secure excellent control performance against the earthquake load. As a result of analyzing the TMD mass ratio, in the case of high-rise buildings, a mass ratio of 0.4% to 0.6% is preferable. In spatial structures, it is desirable to select a mass ratio of 0.1% to 0.2%. Because this study is based on the theoretical study based on numerical analysis, in order to design a TMD for a real structure, it is necessary to select within a range that does not affect the safety of the structure.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hassani, S., & Aminafshar, M., "Optimization of pendulum tuned mass damper in tall building under horizontal earthquake excitation", Bulletin de la Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege, Vol.85, pp.514-531, 2016
  2. Patil, S. S., Javheri, S. B., & Konapure, C. G., "Effectiveness of Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers", International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology, Vol.1, No.6, pp.78-83, 2012
  3. Lee, S. H., Chung, L., Woo, S. S., & Cho, S. H., "Performance Evaluation of Semi-Active Tuned Mass Damper for Elastic and Inelastic Seismic Response Control", Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, Vol.11, No.2, pp.47-56, 2007, doi: 10.5000/EESK.2007.11.2.047
  4. You, K. P., "The Aeroelastic Experiment Vibration Response of Tall Building to Wind Loads Using TMD", Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Vol.20, No.12, pp.37-44, 2004
  5. Kim, H. S., & Lee, D. G. (2008). Use of Semiactive TMDs for Reduction of Wind-induced Response of Tall Buildings. Proceedings of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, Republic of Korea, pp.221-228
  6. Kang, J. W., Kim, G. C., & Kim, H. S., "Seismic Response Control of Arch Structure using Semi-active TMD", Journal of Korean Association for Spatial Structures, Vol.10, No.1, pp.103-110, 2010
  7. Lee, Y. R., Kim, H. S., & Kang, J. W., "Investigation Into Optimal Installation Position of TMD for Efficient Seismic Response Reduction of Retractable-Roof Spatial Structure", Journal of Korean Association for Spatial Structures, Vol.18, No.2, pp.43-50, 2018, doi: 10.9712/KASS.2018.18.2.43
  8. Lee, Y. R., Ro, H. S., Kim, H. S., & Kang, J. W., "Seismic Response Control Performance Evaluation of Retractable-Roof Spatial Structure With Variation of TMD Mass", Journal of Korean Association for Spatial Structures, Vol.19, No.1, pp.75-82, 2019, doi: 10.9712/KASS.2019.19.1.75
  9. Kim, D. H., Kim, H. S., & Kang, J. W., "A Study on Optimum Mass of TMD for Improving Seismic Response Control Performance of Retractable-Roof Spatial Structure", Journal of Korean Association for Spatial Structures, Vol.19, No.3, pp.93-100, 2019, doi: 10.9712/KASS.2019.19.3.93
  10. Farghaly, A. A., "Optimum Design Of TMD System For Tall Buildings", International Journal of Optimization in civil Engineering, Vol.2, No.4, pp.511-532, 2012
  11. Den Hartog, JP., "Mechanical vibrations", 3rd ed., New York, London, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1947.
  12. Warburton, G. B., "Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol.10, No.3, pp.381-401, 1982, doi: 10.1002/eqe.4290100304
  13. Sadek, F., Mohraz, B., Taylor, A. W., & Chung, R. M., "A method of estimating the parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol.26, No.6, pp.617-635, 1998, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199706)26:6<617::AID-EQE664>3.0.CO;2-Z
  14. Leung, A. Y. T., & Zhang, H., "Particle swarm optimization of tuned mass dampers", Engineering Structures, Vol.31, No.3, pp.715-728, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.11.017
  15. Lee, S. H., Woo, S. S., Cho, S. H., & Chung, L., "Optimal Design of Tuned Mass Damper Considering the Friction between the Moving Mass and Rail", Transactions of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering, Vol.17, No.6, pp.553-559, 2007, doi: 10.5050/KSNVN.2007.17.6.553