Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Application of the Multiple Representation-Based Learning Strategies Using Augmented Reality on the Concept of the Particulate Nature of Matter

물질의 입자성 개념에서 증강현실을 활용한 다중 표상 학습 전략의 개발과 적용

  • Received : 2020.05.11
  • Accepted : 2020.07.14
  • Published : 2020.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the effects of the multiple representation-based learning strategies using augmented reality in terms of students' conceptual understanding, achievement, and enjoyment of science lessons. 136 8th-grade students in a coed middle school were randomly assigned to the treatment and the control group. The students learned the concept of the particulate nature of matter related to the properties of substances for four class periods. The multiple representation-based learning strategies designed to facilitate the connecting and integrating representations provided from augmented reality were developed and administered to the students of the treatment group. Results of two-way ANCOVA revealed that the scores of a conceptions test and enjoyment of science lessons test of the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group, regardless of their prior science achievement. In a conceptions test, there was a significant difference in the concept of preservation of particles. However, the difference was not statistically significant in the concept of distribution and motion of particles. In terms of an achievement test, there was a significant interaction effect by their prior science achievement. The scores of low-level students were significantly improved, but the effects were not significant to high-level students. On the bases of the results, educational implications for effective teaching and learning using augmented reality are discussed.

이 연구에서는 증강현실을 활용한 다중 표상 학습 전략이 학생들의 개념 이해도, 학업 성취도, 과학 수업에 대한 즐거움에 미치는 영향을 조사하였다. 남녀 공학 중학교 2학년 학생 136명을 처치 집단과 통제집단으로 무선 배치하였다. 학생들은 네 차시 동안 물질의 특성과 관련한 입자 개념을 학습하였다. 이때 처치 집단의 학생들에게는 증강현실이 제공하는 표상들 사이의 연계와 통합을 촉진할 수 있는 다중 표상 학습 전략을 개발하여 적용하였다. 이원 공변량 분석 결과, 개념 이해도, 과학 수업에 대한 즐거움 검사에 대한 처치 집단의 점수는 학생들의 사전 성취 수준과 무관하게 통제 집단보다 유의미하게 높았다. 개념 이해도 검사의 하위 개념 중 입자의 보존에 대해서는 유의미한 차이가 나타났으나, 분포 및 운동에 대해서는 유의미한 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 학업 성취도 측면에서는 사전 성취 수준과 유의미한 상호작용 효과가 나타났다. 이때 하위권 학생들의 성취도는 유의미하게 향상되었으나 상위권 학생들에게는 유의미한 효과가 나타나지 않았다. 연구 결과를 바탕으로 과학 교수학습에서 증강현실의 효과적인 활용을 위한 교육적 시사점을 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adadan, E., Irving, K., & Trundle, K. C. (2009). Impacts of multirepresentational instruction on high school students' conceptual understandings of the particulate nature of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 31(13), 1743-1775. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802178628
  2. Ainsworth, S. (2008). The educational value of multiple-representations when learning complex scientific concepts. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reimer, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education. (pp. 191-208). Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
  3. Akcayir, M., & Akcayir, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002
  4. Ardac, D., & Akaygun, S. (2005). Using static and dynamic visuals to represent chemical change at molecular level. International Journal of Science Education, 27(11), 1269-1298. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500102284
  5. Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., & Graf, S. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133-149.
  6. Cha, J., Kim, K., & Noh, T. (2004). A comparison of the effects of static graphic and animation in CAI by visual learning preference. Korea Association of Computer Education, 7(5), 1-8.
  7. Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1
  8. Duschl, R., Maeng, S., & Sezen, A. (2011). Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 123-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.604476
  9. Fraser, B. J. (1981). Test of Science-Related Attitudes (TOSRA) Handbook. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
  10. Gavish, N., Gutierrez, T., Webel, S., Rodriguez, J., Peveri, M., Bockholt, U., & Tecchia, F. (2015). Evaluating virtual reality and augmented reality training for industrial maintenance and assembly tasks. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 778-798. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.815221
  11. Ibanez, M. B., Di Serio, A., Villaran, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2014). Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Computers & Education, 71, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.004
  12. Jang, S.-H., & Kye, B.-K. (2007). Educational application of augmented reality contents [증강현실(Augmented Reality) 콘텐츠의 교육적 적용]. The Korea Contents Society, 5(2), 79-85.
  13. Kang, H. (2006). The effects and uses of drawing and writing to promote transformation of external representation in middle school chemistry instruction. (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul.
  14. Kang, H., Kim, B., & Noh, T. (2005). Drawing and writing as methods to assist students in connecting and integrating external representations in learning the particulate nature of matter with multiple representations. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 25(4), 533-540.
  15. Kang, H., Kim, Y., & Noh, T. (2008). The effects of the prescribed instructional strategy for reducing students' connecting errors in learning chemistry concepts with multiple external representations. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(6), 675-684.
  16. Kang, H., Shin, S., & Noh, T. (2008). Exploring the causes of students' connecting errors induced in learning Boyle's Law and Charles's Law with multiple external representations. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 52(5), 550-560. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2008.52.5.550
  17. Kim, J. S., & Lee, T. S. (2018). A study of the application of science education STEAM program based on augment reality for students with intellectual disability. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18, 199-218.
  18. Kwak, Y., Kim, C. J., Lee, Y. R., & Jeong, D. S. (2006). Investigation on elementary and secondary students' interest in science. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 27(3), 260-268.
  19. Kye, B., Kim, J., & Ryu, J. (2007). Educational understanding of augmented reality [증강현실의 교육적 이해]. 2007 KERIS Issue Report. RM 2007-30.
  20. Lee, H. J. (2011). Conceptual change by peer instruction of 6th grade students in science fields. Master's Thesis, Korea National University of Education, Cheongju.
  21. Lee, J. S., Sim, H. A., Kim, K. Y., & Lee, K. S. (2010). Effects of reality based science learning program on learning motivation and achievement: Development and implementation of elementary school level's science learning program applied the Keller's ARCS model. Theory and Practice of Education, 15(1), 99-121.
  22. Lee, J., Lee, B., & Noh, T. (2018). A comparison of middle school students' macroscopic and microscopic conceptions related to the properties of substances. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 62(3), 243-252. https://doi.org/10.5012/JKCS.2018.62.3.243
  23. Lee, S. Y., & Kim, K. S. (2012). A development and application of the learning objects of geometry based on augmented reality. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 16(4), 451-462.
  24. Lim, E.-M. (2012). Revising the value of education technology for the digital generation [디지털 세대를 위한 교육 테크놀로지의 가치 재조명]. Paper presented at the The Korean Society for Early Childhood Education & Care Conference. (pp. 59-77). Seoul.
  25. Lu, S. J., & Liu, Y. C. (2015). Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance children's learning in marine education. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 525-541. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.911247
  26. Matthews, M. R. (2002). Constructivism and science education: A further appraisal. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014661312550
  27. Merritt, J. & Krajcik, J. (2013). Learning progression developed to support students in building a particle model of matter. In G. Tsaparlis & H. Sevian (Eds.), Concepts of matter in science education. (pp. 11-45). Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
  28. Ministry of Education. [MOE] (2015). The 2015 Revised National Curriculum of Science; Ministry of Education: Seoul, 2015.
  29. Munoz-Cristobal, J. A., Jorrin-Abellan, I. M., Asensio-Perez, J. I., Martinez-Mones, A., Prieto, L. P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2014). Supporting teacher orchestration in ubiquitous learning environments: A study in primary education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(1), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2014.2370634
  30. Nam, J. H., Lee, D. W., & Nam, Y. H. (2012). The impact of multimodal representation-based lesson on embeddedness of multimodal representation in high school students' writing. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 56(4), 500-508. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2012.56.4.500
  31. Noh, T., & Scharmann, L. C. (1997). Instructional influence of a molecular-level pictorial presentation of matter on students' conceptions and problem-solving ability. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 199-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199702)34:2<199::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-O
  32. Noh, T., Kang, H. S., & Lee, B. (2006). The influences of the forms of verbal external representations and students' verbal learning style in learning with multiple representations using drawing. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 50(6), 477-485. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2006.50.6.477
  33. Noh, T., Lee, J., Yang, C., Kang, S., & Kang, H. (2016). Investigation of learning progression for dissolution and solution concepts. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(2), 295-302. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.2.0295
  34. Noh, T., Lim, H., Cha, J., Noh, S-G., & Kwon, E.-J. (1997). The instructional influences of cooperative learning strategies: Applying the LT model to middle school physical science course. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 17(2), 139-148.
  35. Park, J. H. (2012). The effects of augmented reality contents on shared mental models and team activity in digital text book. Master's Dissertation, Hanyang University, Seoul.
  36. Park, J., Park, Y., & Kang, S. (2013). Analysis of the level of cognitive demands about concepts of the changes of state and kinetic theory on 'Science 1' textbooks in junior high school(III). Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 57(5), 640-655. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2013.57.5.640
  37. Phon, D. N. E., Ali, M. B., & Halim, N. D. A. (2014). Collaborative augmented reality in education: A review. In 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering (pp. 78-83). IEEE Computer Society.
  38. Rappoport, L. T., & Ashkenazi, G. (2008). Connecting levels of representation: Emergent versus submergent perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1585-1603. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701447405
  39. Ryu, H., & Park, H. (2017). A development and application of the objects on the unit of 'our body' on augmented reality. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 36(4), 367-378. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2017.36.4.367
  40. Sayed, N. E., Zayed, H. H., & Sharawy, M. I. (2011). ARSC: Augmented reality student card an augmented reality solution for the education field. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1045-1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.019
  41. Shin, S., Kim, H., Noh, T., & Lee, J. (2020). High school students' verbal and physical interactions appeared in collaborative science concept learning using augmented reality. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(2), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2020.40.2.191
  42. Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059-1074. https://doi.org/10.1068/p281059
  43. Van Meter, P., & Garner, J. (2005). The promise and practice of learner-generated drawing: Literature review and synthesis. Educational Psychology Review, 17(4), 285-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-8136-3
  44. Van Someren, M. W., Reimann, P., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & De Jong, T. (1998). Learning with multiple representations. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
  45. Wu, H. K. (2003). Linking the microscopic view of chemistry to real-life experiences: Intertextuality in a high-school science classroom. Science Education, 87(6), 868-891. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10090
  46. Yoon, H., & Lee, Y. (2014). Analysis of coherence in middle school students' representation of particulate concepts. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 58(6), 580-589. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2014.58.6.580
  47. Yoon, H., & Woo, A. (2007). Misconception regarding gas properties: Comparative studies between high school and college students. Journal of the Research Institute of Curriculum & Instruction at Ewha Woman University, 11(2), 567-582.
  48. Yun, J., Kang, S., Ahn, I., & Noh, T. (2017). Analyses of verbal interaction among students in small group science learning using smart devices. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 61(3), 104-111. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2017.61.3.104