DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Enhanced Production of Bacterial Cellulose in Komagataeibacter xylinus Via Tuning of Biosynthesis Genes with Synthetic RBS

  • Hur, Dong Hoon (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, BK21 Plus Program, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)) ;
  • Choi, Woo Sung (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, BK21 Plus Program, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)) ;
  • Kim, Tae Yong (Biomaterials Lab, Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology (SAIT), Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Lee, Sang Yup (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, BK21 Plus Program, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)) ;
  • Park, Jin Hwan (Biomaterials Lab, Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology (SAIT), Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Jeong, Ki Jun (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, BK21 Plus Program, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST))
  • Received : 2020.06.18
  • Accepted : 2020.07.02
  • Published : 2020.09.28

Abstract

Bacterial cellulose (BC) has outstanding physical and chemical properties, including high crystallinity, moisture retention, and tensile strength. Currently, the major producer of BC is Komagataeibacter xylinus. However, due to limited tools of expression, this host is difficult to engineer metabolically to improve BC productivity. In this study, a regulated expression system for K. xylinus with synthetic ribosome binding site (RBS) was developed and used to engineer a BC biosynthesis pathway. A synthetic RBS library was constructed using green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a reporter, and three synthetic RBSs (R4, R15, and R6) with different strengths were successfully isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Using synthetic RBS, we optimized the expression of three homologous genes responsible for BC production, pgm, galU, and ndp, and thereby greatly increased it under both static and shaking culture conditions. The final titer of BC under static and shaking conditions was 5.28 and 3.67 g/l, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that reinforced metabolic flux towards BC through quantitative gene expression represents a practical strategy for the improvement of BC productivity.

Keywords

References

  1. Zhong C, Zhang GC, Liu M, Zheng XT, Han PP, Jia SR. 2013. Metabolic flux analysis of Gluconacetobacter xylinus for bacterial cellulose production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97: 6189-6199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-4908-8
  2. Mangayil R, Rajala S, Pammo A, Sarlin E, Luo J, Santala V, et al. 2017. Engineering and characterization of bacterial nanocellulose films as low cost and flexible sensor material. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9: 19048-19056. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b04927
  3. Ha JH, Shah N, Ul-Islam M, Khan T, Park JK. 2011. Bacterial cellulose production from a single sugar $\alpha$-linked glucuronic acid-based oligosaccharide. Process Biochem. 46: 1717-1723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2011.05.024
  4. Sajadi E, Fatemi SSA, Babaeipour V, Deldar AA, Yakhchali B, Anvar MS. 2019. Increased cellulose production by heterologous expression of bcsA and B genes from Gluconacetobacter xylinus in E. coli Nissle 1917. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 42: 2023-2034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-019-02197-4
  5. Buldum G, Bismarck A, Mantalaris A. 2018. Recombinant biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose in genetically modified Escherichia coli. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 41: 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-017-1864-1
  6. Zhu H, Jia S, Wan T, Jia Y, Yang H, Li J, et al. 2011. Biosynthesis of spherical Fe3O4/bacterial cellulose nanocomposites as adsorbents for heavy metal ions. Carbohydr. Polym. 86: 1558-1564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.061
  7. Wu W, Tassi NG, Zhu H, Fang Z, Hu L. 2015. Nanocellulose-based translucent diffuser for optoelectronic device applications with dramatic improvement of light coupling. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 7: 26860-26864. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b09249
  8. Jang WD, Kim TY, Kim HU, Shim WY, Ryu JY, Park JH, et al. 2019. Genomic and metabolic analysis of Komagataeibacter xylinus DSM 2325 producing bacterial cellulose nanofiber. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 116: 3372-3381. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27150
  9. Gwon H, Park K, Chung SC, Kim RH, Kang JK, Ji SM, et al. 2019. A safe and sustainable bacterial cellulose nanofiber separator for lithium rechargeable batteries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116: 19288-19293. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905527116
  10. Campano C, Balea A, Blanco A, Negro C. 2016. Enhancement of the fermentation process and properties of bacterial cellulose: a review. Cellulose 23: 57-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0802-0
  11. Zhang H, Ye C, Xu N, Chen C, Chen X, Yuan F, et al. 2017. Reconstruction of a genome-scale metabolic network of Komagataeibacter nataicola RZS01 for cellulose production. Sci. Rep. 7: 7911. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06918-1
  12. Florea M, Hagemann H, Santosa G, Abbott J, Micklem CN, Spencer-Milnes X, et al. 2016. Engineering control of bacterial cellulose production using a genetic toolkit and a new cellulose-producing strain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113: E3431-E3440. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522985113
  13. Teh MY, Ooi KH, Danny Teo SX, Bin Mansoor ME, Shaun Lim WZ, Tan MH. 2019. An expanded synthetic biology toolkit for gene expression control in Acetobacteraceae. ACS Synth. Biol. 8: 708-723. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.8b00168
  14. Yim SS, An SJ, Kang M, Lee J, Jeong KJ. 2013. Isolation of fully synthetic promoters for high‐level gene expression in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 110: 2959-2969. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24954
  15. Oh YH, Choi JW, Kim EY, Song BK, Jeong KJ, Park K, et al. 2015. Construction of synthetic promoter-based expression cassettes for the production of cadaverine in recombinant Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 176: 2065-2075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-015-1701-4
  16. GieBelmann G, Dietrich D, Jungmann L, Kohlstedt M, Jeon EJ, Yim SS, et al. 2019. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for high‐level ectoine production: design, combinatorial assembly, and implementation of a transcriptionally balanced heterologous ectoine pathway. Biotechnol. J. 14: 1800417. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201800417
  17. Hestrin S, Schramm M. 1954. Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. 2. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem. J. 58: 345-352. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0580345
  18. Hur DH, Rhee HS, Lee JH, Shim WY, Kim TY, Lee SY, et al. 2020. Enhanced production of cellulose in Komagataeibacter xylinus by preventing insertion of IS element into cellulose synthesis gene. Biochem. Eng. J. 156: 107527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2020.107527
  19. Kim J, Yun J, Rhee H, Chung S. 2016. Vector replicable in E. coli and cell of genus Komagataeibacter, cell including the same, and method of using the same. U.S. Patent No. 9,976,150. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  20. Seo SW, Yang JS, Kim I, Yang J, Min BE, Kim S, et al. 2013. Predictive design of mRNA translation initiation region to control prokaryotic translation efficiency. Metab. Eng. 15: 67-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2012.10.006
  21. Salis HM, Mirsky EA, Voigt CA. 2009. Automated design of synthetic ribosome binding sites to control protein expression. Nat. Biotechnol. 27: 946-950. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1568

Cited by

  1. Engineering Bacterial Cellulose by Synthetic Biology vol.21, pp.23, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239185
  2. Developments in bioprocess for bacterial cellulose production vol.344, pp.no.pb, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126343
  3. Bacterial Nanocellulose Fortified with Antimicrobial and Anti-Inflammatory Natural Products from Chelidonium majus Plant Cell Cultures vol.15, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010016
  4. Development of novel biocomposites based on the clean production of microbial cellulose from dairy waste (sour whey) vol.139, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.51433