Journal of Trauma and Injury

The Korean Society of Traumatology (대한외상학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Early Experience of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) in the Republic of Korea: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

  • Park, Joonhyeon (Department of Surgery, Trauma Center, Yonsei University Wonju Severance Christian Hospital) ;
  • Jang, Sung Woo (Department of Surgery, Trauma Center, Yonsei University Wonju Severance Christian Hospital) ;
  • Yu, Byungchul (Department of Surgery, Trauma Center, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Gil Jae (Department of Surgery, Trauma Center, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Chang, Sung Wook (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Trauma Center, Dankook University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Dong Hun (Department of Surgery, Trauma Center, Dankook University Hospital) ;
  • Chang, Ye Rim (Department of Surgery, Trauma Center, Dankook University Hospital) ;
  • Jung, Pil Young (Department of Surgery, Trauma Center, Yonsei University Wonju Severance Christian Hospital)
  • Received : 2020.09.15
  • Accepted : 2020.09.24
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This retrospective multicenter study analyzed trauma patients who underwent resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in the Republic of Korea. Methods: This study was conducted from February 2017 to May 2018 at three regional trauma centers in the Republic of Korea. The patients were divided into two groups (cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR] and No-CPR) for comparative analysis based on two criteria (complication and mortality) for logistic regression analysis (LRA). Results: There were significant differences between the CPR and No-CPR groups in mortality (p=0.003) and treatment administered (p=0.016). By LRA for complications, total occlusion has significantly lesser risk than intermittent or partial occlusion in both univariate (odds ratio [OR] 0.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.00-0.36, p=0.01) and multivariate (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.00-0.38, p=0.01) analyses. The Rescue had a higher risk than the Coda or Reliant in univariate analysis (OR 4.91, 95% CI 1.14-34.25, p=0.05); however, it was not statistically significant in multivariate analysis (OR 6.98, 95% CI 1.03-74.52, p=0.07). By LRA for mortality, the CPR group was the only variable that had a significantly higher risk of mortality than the No-CPR group in both univariate (OR 17.59, 95% CI 3.05-335.25, p=0.01), and multivariate (OR 24.92, 95% CI 3.77-520.51, p=0.01) analyses. Conclusions: This study was conducted in the early stages of REBOA implementation in the Republic of Korea and showed conflicting results from studies conducted by multiple institutions. Therefore, additional research with more accumulated data is needed.

Keywords

References

  1. Tien HC, Spencer F, Tremblay LN, Rizoli SB, Brenneman FD. Preventable deaths from hemorrhage at a level I Canadian trauma center. J Trauma 2007;62:142-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000251558.38388.47
  2. Kauvar DS, Lefering R, Wade CE. Impact of hemorrhage on trauma outcome: an overview of epidemiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic considerations. J Trauma 2006;60(Suppl 6):S3-11.
  3. Cannon JW. Hemorrhagic shock. N Engl J Med 2018;378:370-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1705649
  4. Brenner M, Inaba K, Aiolfi A, DuBose J, Fabian T, Bee T, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and resuscitative thoracotomy in select patients with hemorrhagic shock: early results from the american association for the surgery of trauma's aortic occlusion in resuscitation for trauma and acute care surgery registry. J Am Coll Surg 2018;226:730-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.01.044
  5. Darrabie MD, Croft CA, Brakenridge SC, Mohr AM, Rosenthal MA, Mercier NR, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: implementation and preliminary results at an academic level I trauma center. J Am Coll Surg 2018;227:127-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.03.042
  6. Segalini E, Di Donato L, Birindelli A, Piccinini A, Casati A, Coniglio C, et al. Outcomes and indications for emergency thoracotomy after adoption of a more liberal policy in a western European level 1 trauma centre: 8-year experience. Updates Surg 2019;71:121-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0607-4
  7. Moore LJ, Brenner M, Kozar RA, Pasley J, Wade CE, Baraniuk MS, et al. Implementation of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta as an alternative to resuscitative thoracotomy for noncompressible truncal hemorrhage. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015;79:523-30; discussion 530-2. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000809
  8. Byun CS, Park IH, Oh JH, Bae KS, Lee KH, Lee E. Epidemiology of trauma patients and analysis of 268 mortality cases: trends of a single center in Korea. Yonsei Med J 2015;56:220-6. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.1.220
  9. Chung JS, Kim OH, Kim S, Jang JY, An GJ, Jung PY. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in impending traumatic arrest: is it effective? J Trauma Inj 2020;33:23-30. https://doi.org/10.20408/jti.2020.001
  10. Biffl WL, Fox CJ, Moore EE. The role of REBOA in the control of exsanguinating torso hemorrhage. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015;78:1054-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000609
  11. Chen YC, Wu KH, Hsiao KY, Hung MS, Lai YC, Chen YS, et al. Factors associated with outcomes in traumatic cardiac arrest patients without prehospital return of spontaneous circulation. Injury 2019;50:4-9.
  12. Brenner M, Bulger EM, Perina DG, Henry S, Kang CS, Rotondo MF, et al. Joint statement from the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS COT) and the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) regarding the clinical use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2018;3:e000154. https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2017-000154
  13. Bekdache O, Paradis T, Shen YBH, Elbahrawy A, Grushka J, Deckelbaum D, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA): indications: advantages and challenges of implementation in traumatic non-compressible torso hemorrhage. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2019;4:e000262. https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000262
  14. Ordonez CA, Parra MW, Manzano-Nunez R, Herrera-Escobar JP, Serna JJ, Rodriguez Ossa P, et al. Intraoperative combination of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and a median sternotomy in hemodynamically unstable patients with penetrating chest trauma: is this feasible? J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2018;84:752-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001807
  15. Ribeiro Junior MAF, Feng CYD, Nguyen ATM, Rodrigues VC, Bechara GEK, de-Moura RR, et al. The complications associated with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). World J Emerg Surg 2018;13:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0181-6
  16. Sadeghi M, Dogan EM, Karlsson C, Jansson K, Seilitz J, Skoog P, et al. Total resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta causes inflammatory activation and organ damage within 30 minutes of occlusion in normovolemic pigs. BMC Surg 2020;20:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00700-3
  17. Osborn LA, Brenner ML, Prater SJ, Moore LJ. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: current evidence. Open Access Emerg Med 2019;11:29-38. https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S166087
  18. Hoareau GL, Tibbits EM, Beyer CA, Simon MA, DeSoucy ES, Faulconer ER, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: review of the literature and applications to veterinary emergency and critical care. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00197
  19. Otsuka H, Sato T, Sakurai K, Aoki H, Yamagiwa T, Iizuka S, et al. Effect of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in hemodynamically unstable patients with multiple severe torso trauma: a retrospective study. World J Emerg Surg 2018;13:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0210-5
  20. Matsumura Y, Matsumoto J, Kondo H, Idoguchi K, Ishida T, Kon Y, et al. Fewer REBOA complications with smaller devices and partial occlusion: evidence from a multicentre registry in Japan. Emerg Med J 2017;34:793-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2016-206383
  21. Teeter WA, Matsumoto J, Idoguchi K, Kon Y, Orita T, Funabiki T, et al. Smaller introducer sheaths for REBOA may be associated with fewer complications. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2016;81:1039-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001143
  22. Ozkurtul O, Staab H, Osterhoff G, Ondruschka B, Hoch A, Josten C, et al. Technical limitations of REBOA in a patient with exsanguinating pelvic crush trauma: a case report. Patient Saf Surg 2019;13:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-019-0204-6
  23. Tiba MH, McCracken BM, Cummings BC, Colmenero CI, Rygalski CJ, Hsu CH, et al. Use of resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta in a swine model of prolonged cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2019;140:106-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.05.010