DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

치과용 CAD/CAM 전용 세라믹기반 하이브리드 레진 수복물의 변연 적합 연구

A study on marginal fit of the ceramic-based hybrid resin restoration for dental CAD/CAM systems

  • Jeong, Chang-Seop (Department of Dental Laboratory Technology, Wonkwang Health Science University) ;
  • Park, Jong-Kyoung (Department of Dental Technology, College of Health Care, Gimcheon University)
  • 투고 : 2020.07.31
  • 심사 : 2020.08.14
  • 발행 : 2020.09.30

초록

Purpose: This study aimed to assess and compare the marginal fit of ceramic-based hybrid resin restoration (HYB) and zirconia restoration (ZIR) for dental computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems. Methods: A stainless steel master model was produced. The impression was first made with silicone, and then stone working models were produced. A total of twenty restorations were fabricated with two different materials: ZIR and HYB. The silicone film thickness of the marginal gap was measured using a digital microscope; digital photos were taken at a magnification of ×160, and then analyzed using a measurement software. The values of the result were evaluated with the independent-sample t-test (α=0.05). All statistical analyses were performed with a statistical software. Results: The mean values for the marginal gap was 37.14±2.96 ㎛ for HYB, compared with 40.37±5.26 ㎛ for ZIR. No significant difference was found between ZIR and HYB (p=0.107). Conclusion: As a result, the marginal fit of the restoration fabricated using the hybrid resin was better than that of the restoration fabricated using zirconia. Also, the marginal fit of all groups was below the clinical acceptable range of 120 ㎛. Thus, HYB for dental CAD/CAM system in this study is expected to be suitable for clinical use in dentistry.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi UJ, Shin MH, Chung HS, Koh MW. A study on how cyclic casting of base metal alloy for dental ceramic crown may effects upon its mechanical properties and microstructure. J Kor Aca Den Tec. 2003;25:9-20.
  2. Shin MH, Kim YS, Choi UJ, Chung HS. A study on improvements in manufatured technique of all ceramic crown. J Kor Aca Den Tec. 2002;23:9-15.
  3. Kim EH, Lee MK. A comparative study on the fracture strength of esthetic porcelain crowns. J Kor Aca Den Tec. 2007;29:79-85.
  4. Seghi RR, Sorensen JA. Relative flexural strength of six new ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont. 1995;8:239-246.
  5. Daniel C, Drummond J, Giordano RA. Improving flexural strength of dental restorative ceramics using laser interference direct structuring. J Am Ceram Soc. 2008;91:3455-3457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02642.x
  6. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009;28:44-56. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.44
  7. Petrini M, Ferrante M, Su B. Fabrication and characterization of biomimetic ceramic/polymer composite materials for dental restoration. Dent Mater. 2013;29:375-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.12.004
  8. Della Bona A, Corazza PH, Zhang Y. Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material. Dent Mater. 2014;30:564-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.019
  9. Arocha MA, Basilio J, Llopis J, Di Bella E, Roig M, Ardu S, et al. Colour stainability of indirect CAD-CAM processed composites vs. conventionally laboratory processed composites after immersion in staining solutions. J Dent. 2014;42:831-838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.002
  10. Rekow ED. High-technology innovations-and limitations-for restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 1993;37:513-524.
  11. Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR. The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Aust Dent J. 1995;40:17-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb05607.x
  12. Wataha JC. Alloys for prosthodontic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:351-363. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.123817
  13. Contrepois M, Soenen A, Bartala M, Laviole O. Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;110:447-454.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.003
  14. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62:405-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4
  15. Saleh ARM, Al-Ani M, ALRawi T, Al-Edressi G. An in-vitro comparison of fracture resistance of three CAD/CAM ceramic materials for fabricating veneer. Saudi Dent J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.03.013.
  16. Shofu. SHOFU block HC. Disk HC [Internet]. Ratingen: SHOFU Dental GmbH; 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www.shofu.de/en/produkt/shofu-block-hcuk/.
  17. Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:641-652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02094.x
  18. Poticny DJ, Klim J. CAD/CAM in-office technology: innovations after 25 years for predictable, esthetic outcomes. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141 Suppl 2:5S-9S. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0356
  19. Lang NP, Kiel RA, Anderhalden K. Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. J Clin Periodontol. 1983;10:563-578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1983.tb01295.x
  20. Lofstrom LH, Barakat MM. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of clinically cemented cast gold restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61:664-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(89)80038-1
  21. Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, Wirthman GP. Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65:357-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90225-L
  22. Goldman M, Laosonthorn P, White RR. Microleakage-full crowns and the dental pulp. J Endod. 1992;18:473-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81345-2
  23. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Clinical and SEM evaluation of all-ceramic chair-side CAD/CAM-generated partial crowns. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;111:163-169. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00022.x
  24. Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:244-248.
  25. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R. Brittleness index of machinable dental materials and its relation to the marginal chipping factor. J Dent. 2007;35:897-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.002
  26. Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resinceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114:587-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.016
  27. Beuer F, Aggstaller H, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Sorensen J. Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers. Dent Mater. 2009;25:94-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.018
  28. Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G. Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns-validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:116-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2003.01203.x
  29. Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:18-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90147-5
  30. Holst S, Karl M, Wichmann M, Matta RE. A new triplescan protocol for 3D fit assessment of dental restorations. Quintessence Int. 2011;42:651-657.
  31. Rahme HY, Tehini GE, Adib SM, Ardo AS, Rifai KT. In vitro evaluation of the "replica technique" in the measurement of the fit of Procera crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008;9:25-32.
  32. Assif D, Rimer Y, Aviv I. The flow of zinc phosphate cement under a full-coverage restoration and its effect on marginal adaptation according to the location of cement application. Quintessence Int. 1987;18:765-774.
  33. Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, Chappell RP. Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:26-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90260-J
  34. Moon BH, Yang JH, Lee SH, Chung HY. A study on the marginal fit of all-ceramic crown using CCD camera. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 1998;36:273-292.
  35. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971;131:107-111. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708