DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Ramp Gradients and Pushing-Pulling Techniques on Lumbar Spinal Load in Healthy Workers

  • Received : 2019.09.30
  • Accepted : 2020.05.12
  • Published : 2020.09.30

Abstract

Background: Many tasks in industrial and health care setting are involved with pushing and pulling tasks up or down on a ramp. An efficient method of moving cart which reduces the risk of low back pain should be concerned. This study aimed to investigate the effects of handling types (HTs) and slope on lumbar spinal load during moving a cart on a ramp. We conducted a 2 × 2 × 4 factorial design with three main factors: 2 HTs, 2 handling directions of moving a cart and 4 degrees of ramp slope. Methods: Thirty healthy male workers performed 14 tasks consist of moving a cart up and down on the ramp of 0°, 10°, 15°, and 20° degrees with pushing and pulling methods. Joint angles from a 3D motion capture system combined with subject height, body weight, and hand forces were used to calculate the spinal load by the 3DSSPP program. Results: Our results showed significant effect of HT, handling directions and slope on compression and shear force of the lumbar spine (p < 0.001). When the ramp gradient increased, the L4/5 compression forces increased in both pushing and pulling (p < 0.001) Shear forces increased in pulling and decreased in pushing in all tasks. At high slopes, pulling generated more compression and shear forces than that of pushing (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Using the appropriate technique of moving a cart on the ramp can reduce the risk of high spinal load, and the pushing is therefore recommended for moving a cart up/down on ramp gradients.

Keywords

References

  1. Jansen JP, Hoozemans MJ, van der Beek AJ, Frings-Dresen MH. Evaluation of ergonomic adjustments of catering carts to reduce external pushing forces. Appl Ergon 2002;33(2):117-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00002-9
  2. da Costa BR, Vieira ER. Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of recent longitudinal studies. Am J Ind Med 2010;53(3):285-323. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20750
  3. Hoogendoorn WE, van Poppel MNM, Bongers PM, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Physical load during work and leisure time as risk factors for back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health 1999;25(5):387-403. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.451
  4. Chaffin DB, Andersson G, Martin BJ. Occupational biomechanics. New York: Wiley; 1999.
  5. Baril-Gingras G, Lortie M. The handling of objects other than boxes: univariate analysis of handling techniques in a large transport company. Ergonomics 1995;38(5):905-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925159
  6. Kumar S. Upper body push-pull strength of normal young adults in sagittal plane at three heights. Int J Ind Ergon 1995;15(6):427-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(94)00062-8
  7. Snook SH. The design of manual handling tasks. Ergonomics 1978;21(12):963-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140137808931804
  8. Garg A, Moore JS. Epidemiology of low-back pain in industry. Occup Med 1992;7(4):593-608.
  9. Hoozemans MJ, van der Beek AJ, Frings-Dresen MH, van Dijk FJ, van der Woude LH. Pushing and pulling in relation to musculoskeletal disorders: a review of risk factors. Ergonomics 1998;41(6):757-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401398186621
  10. Winkel J. On the manual handling of wide-body carts used by cabin attendants in civil aircraft. Appl Ergon 1983;14(3):162-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(83)90077-7
  11. Engels JA, Van Der Gulden J, Senden TF, van't Hof B. Work related risk factors for musculoskeletal complaints in the nursing profession: results of a questionnaire survey. Occup Environ Med 1996;53(9):636-41. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.53.9.636
  12. Snook SH, Ciriello VM. The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. Ergonomics 1991;34(9):1197-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139108964855
  13. Kuorinka I. Work related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). A reference book for prevention; 1995. p. 46-53.
  14. Hashim N, Kamat SR, Halim I, Othman MS. A study on push-pull analysis associated with awkward posture among workers in aerospace industry. Age 2014;25(5).
  15. Meenaxi T, Sudha B. Causes of musculoskeletal disorder in textile industry. Int Res J Soc Sci 2012;1(4):48-50.
  16. Lind CM. Pushing and pulling: an assessment tool for occupational health and safety practitioners. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2018;24(1):14-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2016.1258811
  17. Cole DC, Van Eerd D, Bigelow P, Rivilis I. Integrative interventions for MSDs: nature, evidence, challenges & directions. J Occup Rehabil 2006;16(3):351-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-006-9032-5
  18. Nimbarte AD, Sun Y, Jaridi M, Hsiao H. Biomechanical loading of the shoulder complex and lumbosacral joints during dynamic cart pushing task. Appl Ergon 2013;44(5):841-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.02.008
  19. Lett KK, McGill SM. Pushing and pulling: personal mechanics influence spine loads. Ergonomics 2006;49(9):895-908. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130600665869
  20. Bennett A, Todd A, Desai S. Pushing and pulling, technique and load effects: an electromyographical study. Work 2011;38(3):291-9. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2011-1132
  21. Chaffin DB. Manual materials handling and the biomechanical basis for prevention of low-back pain in industrydan overview. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1987;48(12):989-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298668791385967
  22. Thelen DG, Ashton-Miller JA, Schultz AB. Lumbar muscle activities in rapid three-dimensional pulling tasks. Spine 1996;21(5):605-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199603010-00014
  23. Argubi-Wollesen A, Wollesen B, Leitner M, Mattes K. Human body mechanics of pushing and pulling: analyzing the factors of task-related strain on the musculoskeletal system. Saf Health Work 2017;8(1):11-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2016.07.003
  24. The Center for Ergonomics of University of Michigan. 3D static strength prediction program [Internet]. [cited 2017 Sep 2]. Available from: https://c4e engin.umich.edu/tools-services/3dsspp-software/.
  25. Cakit E. Ergonomic assessment of airport shuttle driver tasks using an ergonomic analysis toolset. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2018;24(2):286-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2016.1276703
  26. Wiggermann N. Biomechanical evaluation of a bed feature to assist in turning and laterally repositioning patients. Hum Factor. 2016;58(5):748-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815612625
  27. Tafazzol A, Aref S, Mardani M, Haddad O, Parnianpour M. Epidemiological and biomechanical evaluation of airline baggage handling. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2016;22(2):218-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2015.1126457
  28. Gutierrez M, Monzo J. Prevalence of low back disorders among female workers and biomechanical limits on the handling of load and patients. Work 2012;41(Suppl. 1):2364-9. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0466-2364
  29. Cooper G, Ghassemieh E. Risk assessment of patient handling with ambulance stretcher systems (ramp/(winch), easi-loader, tail-lift) using biomechanical failure criteria. Med Eng Phys 2007;29(7):775-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.08.008
  30. Botti L, Galizia FG, Mora C, Zecchi G. A thorough investigation on pushing activities in industry: the impact of the variation in the speed of motion and load conditions on initial and sustained forces. Appl Ergon 2020;85:103080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103080
  31. The effect of speed variation on initial and sustained forces during pushing and pulling activities: a preliminary study. In: Botti L, Mora C, Zecchi G, Baruffaldi G, editors. international conference on applied human factors and ergonomics. Springer; 2018.
  32. Giagloglou E, Radenkovic M, Brankovic S, Antoniou P, Zivanovic-Macuzic I. Pushing, pulling and manoeuvring an industrial cart: a psychophysiological study. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2019;25(2):296-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2017.1370231
  33. El Ouaaid Z, Shirazi-Adl A, Plamondon A. Trunk response and stability in standing under sagittal-symmetric pullepush forces at different orientations, elevations and magnitudes. J Biomech 2018;70:166-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.10.008
  34. Lee J, Nussbaum MA, Kyung G. Effects of work experience on work methods during dynamic pushing and pulling. Int J Ind Ergon 2014;44(5):647-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2014.07.007
  35. Weston EB, Aurand A, Dufour JS, Knapik GG, Marras WS. Biomechanically determined hand force limits protecting the low back during occupational pushing and pulling tasks. Ergonomics 2018;61(6):853-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2017.1417643
  36. Lee KS, Chaffin DB, Herrin G, Waikar A. Effect of handle height on lower-back loading in cart pushing and pulling. Appl Ergon 1991;22(2):117-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(91)90310-E
  37. Ohnishi A, Takanokura M, Sugama A. Evaluation of interhandle distance during pushing and pulling of a four-caster cart for upper limb exertion. Saf Health Work 2016;7(3):237-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2016.01.005
  38. Kim CS, Lee D, Kwon S, Chung MK. Effects of ramp slope, ramp height and users' pushing force on performance, muscular activity and subjective ratings during wheelchair driving on a ramp. Int J Ind Ergon 2014;44(5):636-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2014.07.001
  39. Kao HC, Lin CJ, Lee YH, Chen SH. The effects of direction of exertion, path, and load placement in nursing cart pushing and pulling tasks: an electromyographical study. PloS One 2015;10(10).
  40. Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sorensen F, Andersson G, Jorgensen K. Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon 1987;18(3):233-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(87)90010-X
  41. Oxford Metrics plc company. Plug-in gait full body model [Internrt]. [cited 2017 Sep 10]. Available from: https://docs.vicon.com/display/Nexus25/Take+subject+measurements+for+Plug-in+Gait#TakesubjectmeasurementsforPlug-inGait-SubjectmeasurementsforPlug-inGaitfullbodymodel.
  42. Blazquez IN, Warren BL, O'Hanlon AM, Silvestri LR. An adequate interset rest period for strength recovery during a common isokinetic test. J Strength Cond Res 2013;27(7):1981-7. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e3182764d70
  43. Parcell AC, Sawyer RD, Tricoli VA, Chinevere TD. Minimum rest period for strength recovery during a common isokinetic testing protocol. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002;34(6):1018-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200206000-00018
  44. Knapik GG, Marras WS. Spine loading at different lumbar levels during pushing and pulling. Ergonomics 2009;52(1):60-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130802480828
  45. National Institute for Occupational Safety. Work practices guide for manual lifting: US dept. Of health and human services. Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Biomedical and Behavioral Science; 1981.
  46. McGill SM. Low back disorders: evidence-based prevention and rehabilitation. Human Kinetics; 2015.