DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Stability of bimaxillary surgery involving intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy with or without presurgical miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion

  • Ahn, Yoon-Soo (Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Choi, Sung-Hwan (Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Lee, Kee-Joon (Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jung, Young-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Science Research Center, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Baik, Hyoung-Seon (Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Yu, Hyung-Seog (Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2020.03.05
  • Accepted : 2020.04.25
  • Published : 2020.09.30

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability of bimaxillary surgery involving bilateral intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy performed with or without presurgical miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion. Methods: A total of 40 adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion were retrospectively divided into two groups (n = 20 each) according to the use of MARPE for the correction of transverse maxillomandibular discrepancy during presurgical orthodontic treatment. Serial lateral cephalograms and dental casts were analyzed until 6 months after surgery. Results: Before presurgical orthodontic treatment, there was no significant differences in terms of sex and age between groups. However, the difference of approximately 3.1 mm in the maxillomandibular intermolar width was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Two days after surgery, the mandible had moved backward and upward without any significant intergroup difference. Six months after surgery, the maxillary intercanine (2.7 ± 2.1 mm), interpremolar (3.6 ± 2.4 mm), and intermolar (2.0 ± 1.3 mm) arch widths were significantly increased (p < 0.001) relative to the values before presurgical orthodontic treatment in the MARPE group; these widths were maintained or decreased in the control group. However, there was no significant difference in surgical changes and the postsurgical stability between the two groups. No significant correlations existed between the amount of maxillary expansion and postsurgical mandibular movement. Conclusions: MARPE is useful for stable and nonsurgical expansion of the maxilla in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion who are scheduled for bimaxillary surgery.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn J, Kim SJ, Lee JY, Chung CJ, Kim KH. Transverse dental compensation in relation to sagittal and transverse skeletal discrepancies in skeletal Class III patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;151:148-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.031
  2. Proffit WR, Turvey TA, Phillips C. The hierarchy of stability and predictability in orthognathic surgery with rigid fixation: an update and extension. Head Face Med 2007;3:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-3-21
  3. Kim H, Cha KS. Evaluation of the stability of maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography after segmental Le Fort I osteotomy in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion. Korean J Orthod 2018;48:63-70. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2018.48.1.63
  4. Dergin G, Aktop S, Varol A, Ugurlu F, Garip H. Complications related to surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015;119:601-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.01.008
  5. Haas Junior OL, Guijarro-Martinez R, de Sousa Gil AP, da Silva Meirelles L, de Oliveira RB, Hernandez- Alfaro F. Stability and surgical complications in segmental Le Fort I osteotomy: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;46:1071-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.011
  6. Lee SJ, Kim TW, Nahm DS. Transverse implications of maxillary premolar extraction in Class III presurgical orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:740-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.002
  7. Persson M, Thilander B. Palatal suture closure in man from 15 to 35 years of age. Am J Orthod 1977; 72:42-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(77)90123-3
  8. Lee KJ, Park YC, Park JY, Hwang WS. Miniscrew-assisted nonsurgical palatal expansion before orthognathic surgery for a patient with severe mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:830-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.065
  9. Seong EH, Choi SH, Kim HJ, Yu HS, Park YC, Lee KJ. Evaluation of the effects of miniscrew incorporation in palatal expanders for young adults using finite element analysis. Korean J Orthod 2018;48:81-9. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2018.48.2.81
  10. Chung CH, Woo A, Zagarinsky J, Vanarsdall RL, Fonseca RJ. Maxillary sagittal and vertical displacement induced by surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:144-8. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.113791
  11. Chung CH, Font B. Skeletal and dental changes in the sagittal, vertical, and transverse dimensions after rapid palatal expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:569-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.035
  12. Habeeb M, Boucher N, Chung CH. Effects of rapid palatal expansion on the sagittal and vertical dimensions of the maxilla: a study on cephalograms derived from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:398-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.012
  13. Yoshioka I, Khanal A, Tominaga K, Horie A, Furuta N, Fukuda J. Vertical ramus versus sagittal split osteotomies: comparison of stability after mandibular setback. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:1138-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.09.008
  14. Suri L, Taneja P. Surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: a literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:290-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.021
  15. Akkaya S, Lorenzon S, Ucem TT. A comparison of sagittal and vertical effects between bonded rapid and slow maxillary expansion procedures. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:175-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/21.2.175
  16. Hwang S, Noh Y, Choi YJ, Chung C, Lee HS, Kim KH. Dentofacial transverse development in Koreans according to skeletal maturation: a cross-sectional study. Korean J Orthod 2018;48:39-47. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2018.48.1.39
  17. Lee KJ, Choi SH, Choi TH, Shi KK, Keum BT. Maxillary transverse expansion in adults: rationale, appliance design, and treatment outcomes. Semin Orthod 2018;24:52-65. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2018.01.006
  18. Choi SH, Shi KK, Cha JY, Park YC, Lee KJ. Nonsurgical miniscrew-assisted rapid maxillary expansion results in acceptable stability in young adults. Angle Orthod 2016;86:713-20. https://doi.org/10.2319/101415-689.1
  19. Park JJ, Park YC, Lee KJ, Cha JY, Tahk JH, Choi YJ. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes after miniscrewassisted rapid palatal expansion in young adults: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Korean J Orthod 2017;47:77-86. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.2.77
  20. Lim HM, Park YC, Lee KJ, Kim KH, Choi YJ. Stability of dental, alveolar, and skeletal changes after miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion. Korean J Orthod 2017;47:313-22. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.5.313
  21. Koo YJ, Choi SH, Keum BT, Yu HS, Hwang CJ, Melsen B, et al. Maxillomandibular arch width differences at estimated centers of resistance: comparison between normal occlusion and skeletal Class III malocclusion. Korean J Orthod 2017;47:167-75. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2017.47.3.167
  22. Park JC, Baek WS, Choi SH, Cho KS, Jung UW. Longterm outcomes of dental implants placed in elderly patients: a retrospective clinical and radiographic analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:186-91.
  23. Hong HG. Changes in sagittal and vertical dimensions by non-surgical miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion in adults [MD thesis]. Seoul: Yonsei University; 2019.
  24. Nihara J, Takeyama M, Takayama Y, Mutoh Y, Saito I. Postoperative changes in mandibular prognathism surgically treated by intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42:62-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.06.024
  25. Handelman CS, Wang L, BeGole EA, Haas AJ. Nonsurgical rapid maxillary expansion in adults: report on 47 cases using the Haas expander. Angle Orthod 2000;70:129-44.
  26. Shin H, Hwang CJ, Lee KJ, Choi YJ, Han SS, Yu HS. Predictors of midpalatal suture expansion by miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion in young adults: a preliminary study. Korean J Orthod 2019;49:360-71. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2019.49.6.360
  27. Han JJ, Yang HJ, Lee SJ, Hwang SJ. Relapse after SSRO for mandibular setback movement in relation to the amount of mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014;42:811-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2013.11.018
  28. Souza Pinto GN, Iwaki Filho L, Previdelli ITDS, Ramos AL, Yamashita AL, Stabile GAV, et al. Threedimensional alterations in pharyngeal airspace, soft palate, and hyoid bone of class II and class III patients submitted to bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: a retrospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019;47:883-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.03.015
  29. Park KH, Sandor GK, Kim YD. Skeletal stability of surgery-first bimaxillary orthognathic surgery for skeletal class III malocclusion, using standardized criteria. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;45:35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.09.015
  30. Jung HD, Jung YS, Kim SY, Kim DW, Park HS. Postoperative stability following bilateral intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy based on amount of setback. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;51:822-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.02.001

Cited by

  1. Clinical applications of miniscrews that broaden the scope of non‐surgical orthodontic treatment vol.24, pp.suppl, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12452