The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Three-dimensional surgical accuracy between virtually planned and actual surgical movements of the maxilla in two-jaw orthognathic surgery

  • Received : 2020.04.10
  • Accepted : 2020.06.08
  • Published : 2020.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the three-dimensional (3D) surgical accuracy between virtually planned and actual surgical movements (SM) of the maxilla in two-jaw orthognathic surgery. Methods: The sample consisted of 15 skeletal Class III patients who underwent two-jaw orthognathic surgery performed by a single surgeon using a virtual surgical simulation (VSS) software. The 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were obtained before (T0) and after surgery (T1). After merging the dental cast image onto the T0 CBCT image, VSS was performed. SM were classified into midline correction (anterior and posterior), advancement, setback, anterior elongation, and impaction (total and posterior). The landmarks were the midpoint between the central incisors, the mesiobuccal cusp tip (MBCT) of both first molars, and the midpoint of the two MBCTs. The amount and direction of SM by VSS and actual surgery were measured using 3D coordinates of the landmarks. Discrepancies less than 1 mm between VSS and T1 landmarks indicated a precise outcome. The surgical achievement percentage (SAP, [amount of movement in actual surgery/amount of movement in VSS] × 100) (%) and precision percentage (PP, [number of patients with precise outcome/number of total patients] × 100) (%) were compared among SM types using Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: Overall mean discrepancy between VSS and actual surgery, SAP, and PP were 0.13 mm, 89.9%, and 68.3%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the SAP and PP values among the seven SM types (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: VSS could be considered as an effective tool for increasing surgical accuracy.

Keywords

References

  1. Jacobson R, Sarver DM. The predictability of maxillary repositioning in LeFort I orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:142-54. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.125576
  2. Semaan S, Goonewardene MS. Accuracy of a LeFort I maxillary osteotomy. Angle Orthod 2005;75:964-73.
  3. Gil JN, Claus JD, Manfro R, Lima SM Jr. Predictability of maxillary repositioning during bimaxillary surgery: accuracy of a new technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:296-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.10.015
  4. Choi JY, Choi JP, Baek SH. Surgical accuracy of maxillary repositioning according to type of surgical movement in two-jaw surgery. Angle Orthod 2009;79:306-11. https://doi.org/10.2319/030608-136.1
  5. Stokbro K, Aagaard E, Torkov P, Bell RB, Thygesen T. Surgical accuracy of three-dimensional virtual planning: a pilot study of bimaxillary orthognathic procedures including maxillary segmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;45:8-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.07.010
  6. Gaber RM, Shaheen E, Falter B, Araya S, Politis C, Swennen GRJ, et al. A systematic review to uncover a universal protocol for accuracy assessment of 3-dimensional virtually planned orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75:2430-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.05.025
  7. Song KG, Baek SH. Comparison of the accuracy of the three-dimensional virtual method and the conventional manual method for model surgery and intermediate wafer fabrication. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:13-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.06.002
  8. De Riu G, Virdis PI, Meloni SM, Lumbau A, Vaira LA. Accuracy of computer-assisted orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2018;46:293-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2017.11.023
  9. Cho HJ. A three-dimensional cephalometric analysis. J Clin Orthod 2009;43:235-52, discussion 235; quiz 273.
  10. Metzger MC, Hohlweg-Majert B, Schwarz U, Teschner M, Hammer B, Schmelzeisen R. Manufacturing splints for orthognathic surgery using a threedimensional printer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:e1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.01.007
  11. Aboul-Hosn Centenero S, Hernandez-Alfaro F. 3D planning in orthognathic surgery: CAD/CAM surgical splints and prediction of the soft and hard tissues results - our experience in 16 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012;40:162-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2011.03.014
  12. Hernandez-Alfaro F, Guijarro-Martinez R. New protocol for three-dimensional surgical planning and CAD/CAM splint generation in orthognathic surgery: an in vitro and in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42:1547-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.03.025
  13. Stokbro K, Aagaard E, Torkov P, Bell RB, Thygesen T. Virtual planning in orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;43:957-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.03.011
  14. Baan F, Liebregts J, Xi T, Schreurs R, de Koning M, Berge S, et al. A new 3D tool for assessing the accuracy of bimaxillary surgery: the OrthoGnathicAnalyser. PLoS One 2016;11:e0149625. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149625
  15. Shaheen E, Sun Y, Jacobs R, Politis C. Three-dimensional printed final occlusal splint for orthognathic surgery: design and validation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;46:67-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.10.002
  16. Van den Bempt M, Liebregts J, Maal T, Berge S, Xi T. Toward a higher accuracy in orthognathic surgery by using intraoperative computer navigation, 3D surgical guides, and/or customized osteosynthesis plates: a systematic review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2018;46:2108-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2018.10.012
  17. Tankersley AC, Nimmich MC, Battan A, Griggs JA, Caloss R. Comparison of the planned versus actual jaw movement using splint-based virtual surgical planning: how close are we at achieving the planned outcomes? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;77:1675-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.03.004
  18. Lin HH, Lo LJ. Three-dimensional computer-assisted surgical simulation and intraoperative navigation in orthognathic surgery: a literature review. J Formos Med Assoc 2015;114:300-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2015.01.017
  19. Mangano FG, Admakin O, Bonacina M, Biaggini F, Farronato D, Lerner H. Accuracy of 6 desktop 3D printers in dentistry: a comparative in vitro study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2020;28:75-85.
  20. Choi JH, Mah J. A new method for superimposition of CBCT volumes. J Clin Orthod 2010;44:303-12.
  21. Gkantidis N, Schauseil M, Pazera P, Zorkun B, Katsaros C, Ludwig B. Evaluation of 3-dimensional superimposition techniques on various skeletal structures of the head using surface models. PLoS One 2015;10:e0118810. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118810
  22. Tucker S, Cevidanes LH, Styner M, Kim H, Reyes M, Proffit W, et al. Comparison of actual surgical outcomes and 3-dimensional surgical simulations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:2412-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.058
  23. Hsu SS, Gateno J, Bell RB, Hirsch DL, Markiewicz MR, Teichgraeber JF, et al. Accuracy of a computeraided surgical simulation protocol for orthognathic surgery: a prospective multicenter study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71:128-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.027
  24. Shehab MF, Barakat AA, AbdElghany K, Mostafa Y, Baur DA. A novel design of a computer-generated splint for vertical repositioning of the maxilla after Le Fort I osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;115:e16-25.

Cited by

  1. Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Identification System Based on the Multi-Stage Convolutional Neural Networks with CBCT Combination Images vol.21, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020505