DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

예비교사의 과학의 본성 지도를 위한 과학의 미학적 모델 측정 방안

Assessment of an Aesthetic Model of Science for NOS Teaching

  • 투고 : 2020.02.20
  • 심사 : 2020.08.03
  • 발행 : 2020.08.31

초록

이 논문에서는 2차원 미학적 모델의 적합성과 유용성을 찾기 위하여 과학자들이 아름답게 생각하는 10가지 과학 실험들을 과학의 미학적 공간에 표상하였고 동시에 10가지 과학 실험을 바탕으로 과학 실험의 그림을 함께 제시하는 리커트 척도의 측정 도구를 개발할 수 있었다. 이를 통해 과학의 미학적 모델을 기반으로 과학의 본성을 지도하는 방안과 그 방안의 효과 측정에 대한 활용 가능성을 제안하는 바이다.

In order to teach the nature of science which is one of the goals of science education, the aesthetic model of science was developed into a two-dimensional model through theoretical reviews on the aesthetic aspect of science. We represented 10 kinds of scientific experiments that scientists thought are beautiful in the aesthetic space of science. This paper tried to represent the greatest and famous scientific experiments in the history of science into the aesthetic space of science to find the suitability or usefulness of that model. At the same time, we were able to develop measuring tools as the Likert-scale with pictures of scientific experiments. Through this, we propose various teaching approaches on the nature of science (NOS) based on the aesthetic model of science and the potential for utilization in measuring the effects of the ways of teaching NOS.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bell, R. L. (2008). Teaching the nature of science through process skills: Activities for grades 3-8. Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn and Bacon.
  2. Crease, R. (2003). The prism and the pendulumn: The ten most beautiful experiments in science(M. N. Kim, Trans.). Manhattan, NY: Random House. (Original work published 2003)
  3. Girod, M. (2006). A conceptual overview of the role of beauty and aesthetics in science. A paper published in Division of Teacher Education, Western Oregon University.
  4. Kwon, S. K. (2018a) An aesthetic model of science for teaching of NOS. Research Science and Math Education, 41, 155-170.
  5. Kwon, S. K. (2018b) Theoretical summary for aesthetic model of science for teaching NOS. Journal of Elementary Education, 34(2), 201-220.
  6. Le Deist, F. D., & Winterton, J. (2005) What is competence? Human Resource Development Internation, 8(1), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/1367886042000338227
  7. Martin, D. J.,(2012). Elementary science methods: A constructive approach(S. K. Kwon, D. R. Kim, & C. Lim, Trans.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. (Original work published 2009).
  8. Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (2012). Teaching for understanding: A human constructivist view. (S. K. Kwon, Trans.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. (Original work published 1998)