DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Subject Approach to Information Retrieval with Special Reference to Bengali Documents: A Critical Study

  • 투고 : 2020.04.02
  • 심사 : 2020.07.24
  • 발행 : 2020.09.30

초록

The library provides its services to satisfy the user's approach. Naturally, the development of library services may determine by considering the satisfaction of users. It traces users' perceptions regarding subject access highlighting problems in the retrieval of Bengali documents by subject. This study has designed to assess users' attitudes towards the retrievals of Bengali documents in OPAC through subject headings. For a collection of data, a representative sample has drawn from a large and heterogeneous population consisting of users in university libraries of West Bengal using a stratified sampling technique. Subsequently, under each of the universities, users' community was stratified into students, research scholars, and faculty members. Under each stratum, the sample selected on a random basis. The users met personally to collect relevant data, while they came to the library and went on to search OPAC. A structured schedule, prepared for the purpose, was presented before library users and consequently, interviews and interpretations recorded systematically. In this manner, several factors have identified concerning subject searching and retrieval performance for Bengali documents. This study explores the access using subject headings in multilingual information retrieval systems. Moreover, the suitability of subject headings for retrieval of Bengali resources has ascertained from the users' point of view. The findings demand standard principles and rules for the construction of Bengali subject headings to maintain uniformity and consistency.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abdoulaye, K. (2002). Perceptions of Cataloguers and End-users towards Bilingual Authority Files. The Electronic Library, 20(3), 202-210. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470210432348
  2. Albarillo, F. (2016). Evaluating Language Functionality in Library Databases. International Information & Library Review, 48(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2016.1146036
  3. Alzofon, S. R., & Van Pulis, N. (1984). Patterns of Searching and Success Rates in an Online Public Access Catalogue. College & Research Libraries, 45(2), 110-115. http://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/download/13984/15430 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_45_02_110
  4. Bandyapadhyay, R. (2001). Suchikaran [Cataloguing]. Kolkata: Bangiya Granthagar Parisad.
  5. Bhattacharyay, K. (n.d.). Bishay Shiranam [Subject Headings]. Kolkata: Bangiya Sahitya Parishad.
  6. Colbert, J. L. (2017). Comparing Library of Congress Subject Headings to Keyword Searches Involving LGBT Topics: a Pilot Study [Master's thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign]. IDEALS. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/97437
  7. El-Sherbini, M., & Chen, S. (2011). An Assessment of the Need to Provide Non-Roman Subject Access to the Library Online Catalog. Cataloging & classification quarterly, 49(6), 457-483. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.603108
  8. Guo, J., & Huang, J. (2011). Subject Headings and Subject Search: A Comparative Study. Chinese Librarianship: an International Electronic Journal, 31. http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl31GH.pdf
  9. Halder, S. N. (2015). The Use of Subject Headings for Bengali Documents in Online Public Access Catalog [Doctoral dissertation, Jadavpur University]. Shodhganga. https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/199116
  10. Lehtinen, R. (2013). Multilingual and Multi-Character Set Data in Library Systems and Networks: Experiences and Perspectives from Switzerland and Finland. In Multi-script, Multilingual, Multi-character Issues for the Online Environment: Proceedings of a Workshop Sponsored by the IFLA Section on Cataloguing, Istanbul, Turkey, August 24, 1995 (Vol. 85, p. 67). Walter de Gruyter.
  11. Miller, J., & McCarthy, S. (Eds). (2010). Sears List of Subject Headings. New York: The H. W. Wilson Company.
  12. Mukhopadhyay, P. (2001). Bijnan: Bishay Shironam [Science: subject headings]. Kolkata: Bona.
  13. Rolla, P. J. (2011). User tags versus subject headings. Library Resources & Technical Services, 53(3), 174-184. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.53n3.174
  14. Satija, M. P. (2008). Sears List of Subject Headings: An Introduction to the Nineteenth Edition (2007). Pakistan Journal of Library and Information Science, 9, 31-48. http://111.68.103.26/journals/index.php/pjiml/article/view/809/444
  15. Sridhar, M. S. (2004). Subject Searching in the OPAC of a Special Library: Problems and Issues. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 20(4), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650750410564691
  16. Wu, D., He, D., Qiu, J., Lin, R., & Liu, Y. (2013). Comparing Social Tags with Subject Headings on Annotating Books: A Study Comparing the Information Science Domain in English and Chinese. Journal of Information Science, 39(2), 169-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551512451808