DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Information Retrieval Tools as Predictors for Information Resources Utilization in Academic Libraries in Nigeria

  • Received : 2020.04.17
  • Accepted : 2020.07.13
  • Published : 2020.09.30

Abstract

The study examined information retrieval tools as predictors for information resources utilization, four research questions, and four hypotheses were made to guide the study. A descriptive survey was adopted for the study. Random sampling technique was used to select sample of 393 from a population of 557 academic staff registered in the University of Port Harcourt library. The questionnaire was adopted as a data collection instrument titled Information retrieval as predictors for information resources utilization (IRPIRUQ). Data were analyzed using both simple and multiple regression while analysis of variance (ANOVA) associate with regression was used for testing the hypotheses at 0.05 alpha level. The study revealed that information resources are under utilized as the OPAC and Online Databases are not easily accessed. Further findings showed that the academic staff made use of internet search engines more often than the OPAC and online databases. It was recommended among others that a new library software be installed in place of KOHA for wider connectivity and adequate distribution of software that will aid usage of the online databases and OPAC.

Keywords

References

  1. Afebende, G. B., & Ebaje, A. S. (2008). Utilization Of University Library Facility: A Case Study Of Cross River University Of Technology, Calabar. Nigerian Library And Information Science Trends, 5(1&2), 29-37.
  2. Akanwa, D. C., & Udo-Anyanwu, A. J. (2017). Information Resources and Library. Owerri: Supreme publishers.
  3. Al-Hariri, M. T., & Al-Hattami, A. A. (2015). Utilization of Internet by Health Colleges Students at the University of Dammam. Journal of Taibah University Medical Science, 10(1), 66-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2015.01.006
  4. Atanda, L. A., & Sheriffider, A. A. (2018). Information Retrieval Tools, Catholicon to Accessing Library Resources. Research Journal of Library and Information Science, 2(2), 30-35. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Atanda_Ayanlola/publication/339174612_PP_30-35_ISSN_2637-5915_Research_Journal_of_Library_and_Information_Science_V2_I2/links/5e429e55458515072d91c0c8/PP-30-35-ISSN-2637-5915-Research-Journal-of-Library-and-Information-Science-V2-I2.pdf
  5. Chandra, K., Sankaranarayana, D., & Nagarajan, M. (2014). A Study on Use Pattern E-resources among Faculty Members in Arts and Science College of Chennai. Journal of Advance in Library and Information Science, 3(1), 1-5. http://www.jalis.in/pdf/pdf3-1/Chandra.pdf
  6. David-West, B. T., Effiong, A. E., & Ig-Worlu. M. O. (2014). Effect and Utilization of Electronic Resources on Academic Performance in University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria. African Journal of Education and Information Management, 15(1&2), 40-45.
  7. Edom, B. O. (2012). Principles of the Use of Library. Owerri: Springfield publishers ltd.
  8. Fabunmi, O. M., & Asubiojo, B. O. (2013). Awareness and Use of Online Public Access Catalogue by Students of Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). http/digital/Commonsunl.edu/libphil/practice/922
  9. Hong Sinh, N., & Hong Nhung, H. T. (2012). Users' Searching Behaviour in Using Online Databases at Vietnam National University-Ho Chi Minh City. Library Management, 33(8/9), 458-468. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121211279821
  10. Kinner, L., & Rigda, C. (2009). The Integrated Library System from Daring to Dinosaurs. Journal of Library Administration, 49(4), 401-417. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930820902832546
  11. Kpolovie, P. J. (2018). Multiple Prediction of Research Production: H-Index. European Journal of Computer Science, and Information Technology, 6(5), 7-36.
  12. Kumar, A. (2015). A Use of Patterns of OPAC among the Faculty Members in Great Lakes Institute of Management at Chennai. A case study. Research Spectra, 7(1), 36-45. http://www.researchspectra.com/JournalPapers/V1_I2_P4.pdf
  13. Ozonuwe, O. S., Nwaogu, H. O., Ifijeh, G., & Fagbohun, M. (2018). An Assessment of the Use of Internet Search Engines in an Academic Environment. International Journal of Library Science, 16(2), 23-33. http://eprints.covenantuniversity.edu.ng/11868/1/Assessment%20of%20 Use%20of%20Internet%20Search%20Enginnes.pdf
  14. Rahoo, L. A., Nagar, A. K., & Bhutto, A. (2019). The Use of Information Retrieval Tools by the Post Graduate: Students of Higher Educational Institute of Pakistan. Asian Journal of contemporary education, 3(1), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal/137.2019.31.59.64
  15. Reitz, J. (2005). Dictionary for Library and Information Science. West post Connecticut: Libraries Limited.
  16. Rout, R., & Pangrahi, S. (2018). Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC) Usage Patterns among the Library Users of Odisha. International Journals of Library and Information, 7(1), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJLIS.7.1.2018.005
  17. Saha, P. (2018). Use of OPAC System by Library Users and its Services at KIIT University. http://www.klibjlis.com
  18. Wu, M., & Chen, S. (2012). How Graduate Students Perceive, Use and Manage Electronic Resources. Aslib proceeding. New Information Perspective, 64(6), 641-652. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531211281779