DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Korea Coast Guard Districts Using F-AHP & ARAS Method for Deployment Marine Air Drones

F-AHP법 및 ARAS법을 이용한 해양항공드론 배치를 위한 해양경찰서 관할구역 평가

  • Jang, Woon-Jae (Division of Maritime transportation, Mokpo National Maritime University)
  • 장운재 (목포해양대학교 해상운송학부)
  • Received : 2020.05.04
  • Accepted : 2020.08.28
  • Published : 2020.08.31

Abstract

A marine air drone is a new device that can be used to respond to and prevent marine casualties. Determining the districts where marine air drones can be deployed helps the government decision makers identify efficient policy. The aim of this study is to develop a model using the fuzzy-analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP) and additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method to evaluate appropriate districts for deploying marine air drones. To verify the applicability of the proposed model, a case study was performed with respect to the Korea coast guard (KCG) districts. Since the deployed marine air drones are characterized by a high degree of overlap between the evaluation attributes. the F-AHP is used to determine the weights of identified criteria. The results of this study, show that missing people from the shore was the most important criterion for deployment of the drone. For ranking the local districts of the KCG, the ARAS is applied in the case study with the single goal of 50% reduction in marine casualties. Consequently, the highest priority district was identified as Mokpo, followed by Incheon, Seogwipo, Taean, Wando, Yeosu, Pohang, Tongyeong, Gunsan, Bolyeong, Jeju, Buan, Donghae, Sokcho, Ulsan, Uljin, Busan, Changwon, and Pyeongtaeg.

해양항공드론은 해양사고의 예방과 대응에 이용할 수 있는 새로운 장비이다. 이러한 해양항공드론을 배치하기 위한 관할구역을 결정하는 것은 정부 의사결정자가 효과적인 정책을 마련하도록 도움을 줄 수 있다. 이 연구의 목적은 F-AHP법과 ARAS법을 이용하여 해양항공드론을 배치하기 위한 적절한 구역을 평가하는 모델을 개발하기 위한 것이다. 그리고 이 제안된 모델의 적용가능성을 확인하기 위해 우리나라 해양경찰청의 관할구역에 적용하였다. 해양항공드론의 배치는 평가요소 사이에 중복이 높은 특징이 있기 때문에 식별된 평가항목의 중요도를 결정하기 위해서 F-AHP법을 이용하였다. 그 결과 해양드론의 배치에 있어서 연안에서의 실종자 항목이 가장 중요한 평가항목으로 나타났다. 또한 이 연구에서 지역 해양경찰서의 우선순위는 하나의 목표(해양사고 50 % 저감)를 고려할 수 있는 ARAS법을 이용하였다. 그 결과로서 목포 해양경찰서 관할구역의 우선순위가 가장 높게 나타났고, 인천, 서귀포, 태안, 완도, 여수, 포항, 통영, 군산, 보령, 제주, 부안, 동해, 속초, 울산, 울진, 부산, 창원, 평택 해양경찰서 관할구역 순으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chan, F. T. S. and N. Kumar(2007), Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP based approach, Omega 35, pp. 417-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.08.004
  2. Chang, D. Y.(1992), Extent analysis and synthetic decision, Optimization Techniques and Applications 1, No. 1, pp. 352-355.
  3. Ecer, F.(2018), An integrated fuzzy AHP and ARAS model to evaluate mobile banking services, Technological and economic development of economy, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 670-695. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2016.1255275
  4. Jang, W. J.(2013), Priority Evaluation of Preliminary Cases for IMO Information Management System using Fuzzy TOPSIS and AHP, Journal of Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 493-498. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2013.37.5.493
  5. KCG(2018), Korea Coast Guard, Marine Casualty Statistics.
  6. KMI(2013), Korea Marine Institute, Extensional plans of drone activation in Maritime & Fisheries.
  7. Kwong, C. K. and H. Bai(2003), Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approch. IEE Transactions, Vol. 35, No. 7, pp. 619-626. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170304355
  8. MOF(2019), Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Drone Vitality Plan in Oceans and Fisheries Part until 2023 years.
  9. SLG(2018), Sinan Local Government, The drone industrial developments & the survey of suitable evaluation in maritime & fisheries parts in Sinan Local Government.
  10. Zavadskas, E. K. and Z. Turskis(2010), A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), pp. 159-172. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.10
  11. Zhu, K. J., Y. Jing, and D. Y. Chang(1999), A discussion on extent analysis method and applications of fuzzy AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 116, pp. 450-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00331-2
  12. Zorbas, D., L. D. P. Pugliese, T. Razafindralambo, and F. Guerriero(2016), Optimal drone placement and cost-efficient target coverage, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, Vol. 75, pp. 16-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.08.009