DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the Utilization and Satisfaction of Commercially available Lunchbox by Dietary Lifestyle

식생활라이프스타일에 따른 판매 도시락 이용 실태와 만족도에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Hyosuk (Department of education(Culinary education), Graduate School of Education, Dongguk University) ;
  • Huh, In-Joon (Department of Home Economics, Graduate School, Dongguk University) ;
  • Lee, Sim-Yeol (Department of Home Economics Education, Dongguk University)
  • 김효숙 (동국대학교-서울 교육대학원 조리교육전공) ;
  • 허인준 (동국대학교-서울 대학원 가정학과) ;
  • 이심열 (동국대학교-서울 가정교육과)
  • Received : 2020.08.17
  • Accepted : 2020.08.24
  • Published : 2020.08.31

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated the utilization and satisfaction of lunchbox by considering the dietary lifestyle of the consumer, in order to refine the purchasing behavior of adults with experience in using lunchboxes, and to provide basic data for efficient menu configuration and direction towards improvement. Methods: A total of 600 adults in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do answered a self-administered questionnaire designed to investigate general characteristics, utilization, menu preference, satisfaction, prospection, and improvement of lunchbox, according to the dietary lifestyle. Results: The study subjects were classified into 5 groups: 'taste seeking group', 'safety seeking group', 'health seeking group', 'economic seeking group' and 'convenience seeking group. Considering purchase value of the lunchbox, the 'taste seeking group' had a high utilization rate (35.1%) for prices less than 4,000 won (P < 0.05). Lunchboxes were mainly purchased at the lunchbox store (43.3%) and convenience store (37.7%). The important factor that contributed to purchasing a lunchbox was taste (61.3%), which was highest in the 'taste seeking group' (P < 0.01). The 'health seeking group' showed the highest preference for the low-salt diet lunchbox menu (26.0%) (P < 0.05). The satisfaction of 'health seeking groups' was lowest when considering addition of condiments (2.34%), origin of ingredient (2.59%), and provided calorie (2.81%) (P < 0.05). The overall response indicated future use of the lunchbox (69.6%) (P < 0.01); 35.8% respondents recommended the purchase of lunchbox, where convenience of purchase was the highest factor contributing to recommendation (50.2%) (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Taken together, our results indicate that taste was emphasized in every group purchasing the lunch box. Convenience of purchase was the highest factor contributing to satisfaction, which was relatively low when considering addition of condiments, nutrition and origin of ingredients. We propose that it is necessary to improve the development of various menus for increasing satisfaction by selecting the right ingredients contributing to good health of the consumer.

Keywords

References

  1. Noh YA, Chung HS. A study on current packed lunches bases on newspaper content analysis: referred to articles of 3 major daily newspapers from 2010 to 2016. J Table Food Coord 2017;12(1): 51-65. https://doi.org/10.26433/TFCK.2017.12.1.51
  2. Ministry of agriculture, Food and Rural affairs. HMR market size grew 51.1% in 5 years [internet]. Ministry of agriculture, Food and Rural affairs; 2017 [cited 2017 Feb 7]. Available: https://www.mafra.go.kr/mafra/index.do.
  3. Kim BR. Lunchbox 1 trillion war. Hankyung News. 2019 Nov 04; Sect. A: 21.
  4. Kim HS. A study on purchase intention of bakery according to eating habits [master's thesis]. Chungwoon University; 2008.
  5. Chung LN. Analysis of consumer inclination to convenience towards home meal replacement in Korea [dissertation]. Yonsei University; 2005.
  6. Lazer W. Life style concetps and marketing in stephen greyserm. Towar Sci Mark 1963; 15(4): 130-139.
  7. Seol HK, Lee SH, Jeon JK. An exploratory study on dietary behavior in lifestyle. Food Manag Res 2007; 10(2): 267-284.
  8. Woo LS, Kim CW, Koo BK. The also impact on the purchase of a lunch box, select the properties according to the type of food related life style. J Tour Leis Res 2016; 28(12): 321-334.
  9. Oh J E, Y oon HR. A s tudy o n dietary b ehavior of C hinese consumers segmented by dietary lifestyle. J Korean Soc Food Cult 2017; 32(5): 383-393. https://doi.org/10.7318/KJFC/2017.32.5.383
  10. Park YS, Mo SM. A survey on consumer behavior and nutritional impact of take home packed meals purchased at department stores of Kangnam area, Seoul. Korean Public Health Res 1986; 12(2): 29-39.
  11. Koh HY, Sin DH, Kang TS, Park HW. Survey on the kitchen machinery for the production of convenient food (Dosirak) in Korea. J Korean Soc Food Cult 1987; 2(2): 163-167.
  12. Kwak DK, Key SH, Yoon SI. Assessment of the working environment, production and transportation practices for the packaged meal (Dosirak) manufacturing establishments in Seoul city and Kyungki-do province. J Foodserv Manag 1988; 3(3):293-299.
  13. Park SH, Cho YW. The effect of food-related lifestyle on temple food image and purchase intention. Int J Tour Manag Sci 2015;30(7): 87-104.
  14. Cha SY, Park IY, Jung HS. A survey of consumer importancesatisfaction on prepackaged meals (Dosirak) sold by food service providers. Korean J Food Nutr 2014; 27(1): 136-146. https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2014.27.1.136
  15. Kim HJ. A survey on customet importance-satisfaction of packaged meals (Dosirak) provided by the foodservice industry. J Foodserv Ind Manag Res 2017; 13(2): 71-94.
  16. Kim IH, Bae GK. Menu selection attributes of convenience store lunch box according to food lifestyle through IPA analysis: Focused on college students in Busan. J Foodserv Manag 2017;20(2): 33-52.
  17. Kim BN, Sim KH. Effects of food-related lifestyle on the importance of selected attributes of diet lunch box. Korean J Food Nutr 2017; 30(3): 413-426. https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2017.30.3.413
  18. Kim MJ, Jung HS, Yoon HH. A study on the relationships between food-related lifestyle of undergraduates and the restaurant selection attribute. J Korean Soc Food Cult 2007;22(2): 210-217.
  19. Kim MR, Kim HJ. A study on consumption behaviors regarding red pepper paste according to the food-related lifestyle of housewives. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 2009; 19(1): 1-8.
  20. Kim KH. Effect of a food-related lifestyle on the consumption of and satisfaction with Korean foods, and intention to revisit. J Korea Contents Assoc 2010; 10(8): 370-380. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2010.10.8.370
  21. Kim HC, Kim MR. Intake behavior regarding beverages according to dietary lifestyles of university students. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 2015; 25(2): 223-233. https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2015.4.25.2.223
  22. Kim HI, Lee SH. Undergraduate students' perception and satisfaction on convenience food according to food-related lifestyle. Korea Hosp Tour Acad 2016; 25(7): 85-96.
  23. Kim HJ, Lee SY. A study on food purchasing behavior through internet shopping according to food-related lifestyles of housewives. Korean J Human Ecol 2017; 26(6): 597-608. https://doi.org/10.5934/kjhe.2017.26.6.597
  24. Lee CK. Tourism research & statistical analysis. 2nd ed. Paju: Daewangsa. p. 125-226.
  25. Jeong J. Comparing with students' satisfaction on convenience food according to food-related lifestyle in Incheon area. J Tour Leis Res 2018; 30(3): 141-156. https://doi.org/10.31336/jtlr.2018.03.30.3.141
  26. Choi EK, Cho MS, Oh JE. Consumer perception and attitudes towards sugar reduced beverages according to the food-related lifestyle: focusing on the physical and environmental factors of sugar reduced beverage. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 2019;48(9): 1027-1038. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2019.48.9.1027
  27. An HS. Utilization of home meal replacement according to the women dietary style in Jeonbuk [master's thesis]. Wonkwang University; 2013.
  28. Hwang YJ, Lee SB. The effects of brand image, quality level, and perceived valueon brand credibility and purchase intention: A comparative study between PB lunch boxes from convenience stores and brand lunch boxes. Int J Tour Hosp Res 2016; 30(11):199-217.
  29. Kim JH, Kim YS, Jeon YJ. The effects of the convenience store lunch-box selection attributes on satisfaction and behavioral intentions. J Tour Leis Res 2017; 29(7): 353-370.

Cited by

  1. 가구 형태별 성인 여성의 전자상거래 식품 구매 실태 vol.25, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2020.25.6.464
  2. Studies of Selection Attributes for Lunch Boxes (Dosirak) Using Conjoint Analysis among Single Men vol.50, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2021.50.8.884