Journal of the Korean Society of Food Culture (한국식생활문화학회지)

Korean Society of Food Culture (한국식생활문화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Eating Environments on the Liking of Sodium or Sugar Reduced Foods

섭취 환경 조건이 나트륨 및 당 저감식품 기호도에 끼치는 영향

  • Kim, So Hyun (Department of Nutritional Science & Food Management, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Eui-Su (K Bridge Insight Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Chung, Seo-Jin (Department of Nutritional Science & Food Management, Ewha Womans University)
  • Received : 2020.07.06
  • Accepted : 2020.08.24
  • Published : 2020.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigated the possibility of reducing sodium and sugar intake in the Bulgogi bowl and yogurt, respectively, by utilizing food and non-food factors. Sodium and sugar replacers were the target food factors, and eating environment was the target non-food factor. The sodium content of Bulgogi bowls was reduced by 40%, and a flavor enhancer was applied to compensate for the reduced saltiness. Low calorie sweeteners, such as sucralose and stevia, were used to lower the sugar content of yogurt by 30%. Consumers were asked to evaluate the samples in one of the three eating environments: private booth evaluation, BOOTH; watching video clips during evaluation, VIDEO; conversation with friends during evaluation, FRIEND. The results showed that applying sodium or sugar replacers were effective in lowering sodium or sugar intake, respectively, without compromising the acceptance level of samples. Significant influences of the eating environment were observed on liking and perception of samples, but the influence patterns were not consistent between Bulgogi bowl and yogurt.

Keywords

References

  1. Bigornia SJ, LaValley MP, Noel SE, Moore LL, Ness AR, Newby PK. 2015. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and central and total adiposity in older children: a prospective study accounting for dietary reporting errors. Public health nutrition, 18(7):1155-1163 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980014001700
  2. Bobowski N, Rendahl A, Vickers Z. 2015. A longitudinal comparison of two salt reduction strategies: Acceptability of a low sodium food depends on the consumer. Food Qual. Prefer., 40:270-278 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.019
  3. Carakostas MC, Curry LL, Boileau AC, Brusick DJ. 2008. Overview: the history, technical function and safety of rebaudioside A, a naturally occurring steviol glycoside, for use in food and beverages. Food Chem. Toxicol., 46(7):S1-S10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2008.05.003
  4. Cardello AV. 1994. Consumer expectations and their role in food acceptance. In Measurement of food preferences. Springer, Boston, MA, USA
  5. Cardello AV, Maller O. 1982. Relationships between food preferences and food acceptance ratings. J Food Sci., 47(5):1553-1557 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb04981.x
  6. Chollet M, Gille D, Schmid A, Walther B, Piccinali P. 2013. Acceptance of sugar reduction in flavored yogurt. J Dairy Sci, 96(9):5501-5511 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6610
  7. de Graaf C, Cardello AV, Kramer FM, Lesher LL, Meiselman HL, Schutz HG. 2005. A comparison between liking ratings obtained under laboratory and field conditions:the role of choice. Appetite, 44(1):15-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2003.06.002
  8. Du H, Li L, Bennett D, Guo Y, Key TJ, Bian Z,... & Chen J. 2016. Fresh fruit consumption and major cardiovascular disease in China. N Engl J Med, 374:1332-1343 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1501451
  9. Elzerman JE, Hoek AC, Van Boekel MA, Luning PA. 2011. Consumer acceptance and appropriateness of meat substitutes in a meal context. Food Quality and Preference, 22(3):233-240 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.10.006
  10. Garcia-Segovia P, Harrington, RJ, Seo HS. 2015. Influences of table setting and eating location on food acceptance and intake. Food Quality and Preference, 39:1-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.06.004
  11. Gomes AP, Cruz AG, Cadena RS, Celeghini RMS, Faria JAF, Bolini HMA, ... & Granato D. 2011. Manufacture of low-sodium Minas fresh cheese: Effect of the partial replacement of sodium chloride with potassium chloride. J Dairy Sci. 94(6):2701-2706 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3774
  12. Han T, Seo I, Lim H, Kih M. 2016. Reducing sugar content in processed foods using high intensity sweeteners. Food Sci. Indust. 49(3):29-39
  13. Hein KA, Hamid N, Jaeger SR, Delahunty CM. 2010. Application of a written scenario to evoke a consumption context in a laboratory setting: Effects on hedonic ratings. Food Qual. Prefer., 21(4):410-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.10.003
  14. Hersleth M, Mevik BH, Næs T, Guinard JX. 2003. Effect of contextual factors on liking for wine-use of robust design methodology. Food Qual. Prefer., 14(7):615-622 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00190-8
  15. Hutchings SC, Low JY, Keast RS. 2019. Sugar reduction without compromising sensory perception. An impossible dream? Critical Rev. Food Sci. Nutri., 59(14):2287-2307 https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1450214
  16. Jung K. 2016. Domestic and international trends in technologies for sodium reduction. Food Sci. Indust, 49(2):18-24
  17. Jung K, Ku H, Park K, Oh S. 2017. Sodium reducing effect of salty taste enhancer separated from acid hydrolyzed liquid of wheat protein. Proceedings of the Korean Society for Food Engineering annual spring conference, pp. 215-215
  18. Kim E, Bae Y, Song J, Kim J, Kim M, Cho K, et al. 2014. A guideline for sodium reduction of processed foods II. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition, pp. 331-331
  19. Kim H, Yoon J, Moon S, Choi S, Seo Y, Park J, Jhoo J, Ahn S, Ki1 G. 2016. Fermentation and Quality Characteristics during the Storage of Greek-style Yogurt Supplemented with Stevia Leaf Extract. J. Milk Sci. Biotechnol., 34(1):51-57 https://doi.org/10.22424/jmsb.2016.34.1.51
  20. King SC, Weber AJ, Meiselman HL, Lv, N. 2004. The effect of meal situation, social interaction, physical environment and choice on food acceptability. Food Qual. Prefer., 15(7-8):645-653 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.04.010
  21. Knight, I. 1994. The development and applications of sucralose, a new high-intensity sweetener. Canadian J Physiol. Pharmacol., 72(4):435-439 https://doi.org/10.1139/y94-063
  22. Lee E, Chung S. 2012. Establishing descriptive attributes for commercial gochujang. Proceedings of the Annual Winter Meeting of the Korean Society of Food and Nutrition, pp. 128-128
  23. Ma Y, He FJ, MacGregor GA. 2015. High salt intake:independent risk factor for obesity? Hypertension, 66(4):843-849 https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05948
  24. Meiselman HL. 1992. Methodology and theory in human eating research. Appetite, 19(1):49-55 https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6663(92)90235-X
  25. Meiselman HL, Johnson JL, Reeve W, Crouch J E. 2000. Demonstrations of the influence of the eating environment on food acceptance. Appetite, 35(3):231-237 https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.2000.0360
  26. Mendonça RDD, Lopes ACS, Pimenta AM, Gea A, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Bes-Rastrollo M. 2017. Ultra-processed food consumption and the incidence of hypertension in a Mediterranean cohort: the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra Project. Am. J. Hypertens., 30(4):358-366
  27. Miele NA, Cabisidan EK, Plaza AG, Masi P, Cavella S, Di Monaco R. 2017. Carbohydrate sweetener reduction in beverages through the use of high potency sweeteners:Trends and new perspectives from a sensory point of view. Trends Food Sci.Technol., 64:87-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.04.010
  28. Olde Engberink RH, van den Hoek TC, van Noordenne ND, van den Born BJH, Peters-Sengers H, Vogt L. 2017. Use of a single baseline versus multiyear 24-hour urine collection for estimation of long-term sodium intake and associated cardiovascular and renal risk. Circulation, 136(10):917-926 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029028
  29. Son, J. S., Hong, J. H., & Kim, K. O. 2010. Effects of interval length between tasting sessions and sweetener level on long-term acceptability of novel green tea drinks. Food quality and preference, 21(8):956-966 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.04.008
  30. Takase H, Sugiura T, Kimura G, Ohte N, Dohi Y. 2015. Dietary sodium consumption predicts future blood pressure and incident hypertension in the Japanese normotensive general population. J. Am. Heart Assoc., 4(8):e001959 https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.001959
  31. Torrico DD, Han Y, Sharma C, Fuentes S, Gonzalez Viejo C, Dunshea FR. 2020a. Effects of context and virtual reality environments on the wine tasting experience, acceptability, and emotional responses of consumers. Foods, 9(2):191 https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9020191
  32. Torrico DD, Tam J, Fuentes S, Gonzalez Viejo C, Dunshea FR. 2020b. Consumer rejection threshold, acceptability rates, physicochemical properties, and shelflife of strawberryflavored yogurts with reductions of sugar. J. Sci. Food Agric., 100(7):3024-3035 https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10333
  33. Wallis K, Chapman S. 2012. Food and health innovation service. Current innovations in reducing salt in food products. Gloucestershire: Campden BRI
  34. Yamaguchi S, Takahashi C. 1984. Interactions of monosodium glutamate and sodium chloride on saltiness and palatability of a clear soup. J. Food Sci., 49(1):82-85 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1984.tb13675.x
  35. National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, 2018. A Study on the Relation of nutrient intake and disease and intake of nutrients among Korean Adult. http://www.ndsl.kr/ndsl/search/detail/report/reportSearchResultDetail.do?cn=TRKO201900003458, [accessed 2020. 04. 10.]