Journal of Research and Publication Ethics (연구윤리)

Korea Distribution Science Association (한국유통과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis and Consideration of Plagiarism Cases to Establish Research Ethics in Korea

  • Received : 2020.01.15
  • Accepted : 2020.03.05
  • Published : 2020.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to identify the cause and problem of one plagiarism and suggest a solution. Research design, data and methodology: Based on the Center for Research Ethics Information, this study analyzed the total of 17 cases from October 3, 2017 to June 16, 2020. Results: As seen in the case of this study, the Supreme Court's verdict on plagiarism requires clear sources, whether it is plagiarism or self-plagiarism, and the criterion for plagiarism is the time of writing the work, and the final judgment will be conducted by the court. Evidence-based sources indicate that the researcher or professor provides a lot of anticipation to the academic development and readers who read it. In addition, it is necessary to revise and submit the thesis judge's point of view in the thesis for doctoral dissertation within the proper and reasonable scope. The implications are also very large. Lastly, the reason for dismissal of a doctoral dissertation plagiarized at the time of recruitment is recognized Research ethics should be institutionalized in educational institutions or research institutions. Conclusions: Research ethics education should be strengthened in universities and research institutes. Research ethics is a code of ethics that must be ruled by everyone who explores.

Keywords

References

  1. Ha, Y.T. (2015). The new paradigm of broadcasting copyrights due to the development of broadcasting communication Technology, Journal of Law and Politics research, 15(4), 1629-1644. https://doi.org/10.17926/KAOLP.2015.15.4.1629
  2. Han, S.Y., & Im, E. O. (2013). Comparative Analysis of the Laws and Institutions Related to Academic Research Ethics of Major Countries, Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 20(3), 195-228.
  3. Hwang, H. J., Kim, D. H., Youn, M. K., Lee, J. W., & Lee, J. H. (2014). The Standard of Judgement on Plagiarism in Research Ethics and the Guideline of Global Journals for KODISA, Journal of Distribution Science, 6(53), 15-20.
  4. Kim, G. S.(2014). A Study on the Policy Direction foEstablishing Research Ethics, The Society of Digital Policy and Management, 12(9), 35-46.
  5. Lee, J. D. (2010). Copyright Infringement phenomenon on the Internet and the ways of the police handling, Korean Police Studies Review, 9(1), 163-184.
  6. Lee, I. J. (2007). The Understanding of Citation and Plagiarism for Establishment of the Research Ethics, Ethics Research, 1(77), 257-280.
  7. Lee, I.-J. (2009). The Issues of the Self-Plagiarism and the Establishment of Research Ethics, Ethics Research, 1(73), 1-19.
  8. Lee, I. J. (2012a). Series 1. Research Ethics, Why Is It Necessary?, Asian J Beauty Cosmetol, 10(2), 195-204.
  9. Lee, I.-J. (2012b). Series 3. Plagiarism and Proper Citation, Asian J Beauty Cosmetol, 10(4), 739-745.
  10. Park, J. W., Lee, S. H., & Choi, S. B. (2011). Practical Strategies for Preventing Plagiarism and Protecting Copyright with Establishing Research Ethics, The Journal of Law of Education, 23(2), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.17317/tjle.23.2.201112.27

Cited by

  1. A Study on Ethics Status of Domestic and Foreign Researchers And Finding Solutions to Unfair Authors vol.2, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.15722/jrpe.2.1.202103.1